- All's Well That Ends Well
- Antony and Cleopatra
- As You Like It
- The Comedy of Errors
- Coriolanus
- Cymbeline
- Hamlet
- Henry IV, Part 1
- Henry IV, Part 2
- Henry V
- Henry VI, Part 1
- Henry VI, Part 2
- Henry VI, Part 3
- Henry VIII
- Julius Caesar
- King John
- King Lear
- Love's Labor's Lost
- A Lover's Complaint
- Macbeth
- Measure for Measure
- The Merchant of Venice
- The Merry Wives of Windsor
- A Midsummer Night's Dream
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Othello
- Pericles
- The Rape of Lucrece
- Richard II
- Richard III
- Romeo and Juliet
- Shakespeare's Sonnets
- The Taming of the Shrew
- The Tempest
- Timon of Athens
- Titus Andronicus
- Troilus and Cressida
- Twelfth Night
- The Two Gentlemen of Verona
- Venus and Adonis
- The Winter's Tale
After the A’s win a record number of games in the 2002 season, their success should speak for itself. However, instead of drawing the obvious conclusion—that the A’s sabermetric strategies are revolutionizing the game of baseball—other baseball insiders’ first reaction is to question the A’s strategy and suggest that the A’s won so many games because they were lucky.
Right away, it should be obvious that the A’s didn’t win because of luck. Teams may win individual games because they’re lucky, but they don’t win twenty consecutive games due to sheer random chance. Nevertheless, it’s easier for coaches, players, and…