1984

by George Orwell

1984: Paradox 2 key examples

Definition of Paradox

A paradox is a figure of speech that seems to contradict itself, but which, upon further examination, contains some kernel of truth or reason. Oscar Wilde's famous declaration that "Life is... read full definition
A paradox is a figure of speech that seems to contradict itself, but which, upon further examination, contains some kernel of truth or reason. Oscar... read full definition
A paradox is a figure of speech that seems to contradict itself, but which, upon further examination, contains some kernel... read full definition
Book 1, Chapter 1
Explanation and Analysis—Doublethink:

Because doublethink relies on gaping contradictions, 1984 is full of paradox and situational irony. This is apparent already in the first chapter of the first book, when the narrator outlines the function of the four ministries that make up the government of Oceania.

[...] the Ministry of Truth, which concerned itself with news, entertainment, education, and the fine arts; the Ministry of Peace, which concerned itself with war; the Ministry of Love, which maintained law and order; and the Ministry of Plenty, which was responsible for economic affairs.

Book 1, Chapter 3
Explanation and Analysis—Doublethink:

Because doublethink relies on gaping contradictions, 1984 is full of paradox and situational irony. This is apparent already in the first chapter of the first book, when the narrator outlines the function of the four ministries that make up the government of Oceania.

[...] the Ministry of Truth, which concerned itself with news, entertainment, education, and the fine arts; the Ministry of Peace, which concerned itself with war; the Ministry of Love, which maintained law and order; and the Ministry of Plenty, which was responsible for economic affairs.

Unlock with LitCharts A+
Book 3, Chapter 2
Explanation and Analysis—Tormentor and Protector:

In the second chapter of the third book, Winston wakes up fixed to a bed. He recalls a series of disjointed memories of varying forms of torture, and feels sure that that O'Brien has been "directing everything." In a passage of paradoxical statements, the narrator encapsulates Winston's contradictory relationship to O'Brien:

It was he who decided when Winston should scream with pain, when he should have a respite, when he should be fed, when he should sleep, when the drugs should be pumped into his arm. It was he who asked the questions and suggested the answers. He was the tormentor, he was the protector, he was the inquisitor, he was the friend.

Unlock with LitCharts A+