Need another quote?
Need analysis on another quote?
Need analysis for a quote we don't cover?
Need analysis for a quote we don't cover?
Need analysis for a quote we don't cover?
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
Request it
Request it
Request analysis
Request analysis
Request analysis

Scene 1: At Serge’s Quotes

SERGE: My friend Marc’s an intelligent enough fellow, I’ve always valued our relationship, he has a good job, but he’s one of those new-style intellectuals, who are not only enemies of modernism, but seem to take some sort of incomprehensible pride in running it down… In recent years, these nostalgia-merchants have become quite breathtakingly arrogant.

Related Characters: Serge (speaker), Marc
Page Number and Citation: 3
Explanation and Analysis:
In this passage, Marc has just arrived at his friend Serge’s house to take a look at the painting Serge has just acquired—a vintage canvas by a painter named Antrios, which is five feet by four feet and almost completely white, and which cost the enormous sum of two hundred thousand francs. Marc does not approve of the painting—he is confused by it, and as his visit with Serge goes on, he becomes more and more disturbed and outwardly vexed not just by the painting’s presence but by Serge’s attachment to it. In this quotation, Serge steps forward to address Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaqu

MARC: It’s a complete mystery to me, Serge buying this painting. It’s unsettled me, it’s filled me with some indefinable unease. When I left his place, I had to take three capsules of Gelsemium 9X which Paula recommended because I couldn’t begin to understand how Serge, my friend, could have bought that picture. Two hundred thousand francs! He’s comfortably off, but he’s hardly rolling in money. Comfortable, no more, just comfortable. And he spends two hundred grand on a white painting. I must go and see Yvan, he’s a friend of ours, I have to discuss this with Yvan. Mind you, Yvan’s a very tolerant bloke, which of course, when it comes to relationships, is the worst thing you can be. Yvan’s very tolerant because he couldn’t care less. If Yvan tolerates the fact that Serge has spent two hundred grand on some piece of white shit, it’s because he couldn’t care less about Serge. Obviously.

Related Characters: Marc (speaker), Serge, Yvan
Related Symbols: The Antrios Painting
Page Number and Citation: 4-5
Explanation and Analysis:
As Marc leaves Serge’s apartment, he becomes overwhelmed by anxiety and desperate to understand how Serge could have made the aesthetically empty and also financially risky decision to purchase the Antrios. Because everything in this play is so subjective, it’s impossible to say if Marc is telling himself that Serge is only “comfortably off” to soothe his own ego, when in reality Serge is much wealthier than Marc says. As Marc’s anxiety begins to spiral and worsen, he resolves to involve his “tolerant” and relatively opinionless friend Yvan. He sees Yvan as a kind of blank slate, and hopes to Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati.

Scene 2: At Yvan’s Quotes

YVAN: As long as it’s not doing any harm to anyone else…

MARC: But it is. It’s doing harm to me! I’m disturbed, I’m disturbed, more than that, I’m hurt, yes, I am, I’m fond of Serge, and to see him let himself be ripped off and lose every ounce of discernment through sheer snobbery.

Related Characters: Yvan (speaker), Marc (speaker), Serge
Related Symbols: The Antrios Painting
Page Number and Citation: 10
Explanation and Analysis:
As Marc and Yvan discuss Serge’s purpose, Yvan remains neutral in the conflict—he believes that as long as the painting makes Serge happy and isn’t doing harm to anyone, he and Marc should just let him be. But Marc insists that the painting is not just offensive but painful to him personally. Marc, however, cunningly frames his “disturbed” attitude toward the painting as personal concern for Serge—not revealing the truth behind his worry, which is that Serge has surpassed and outstripped him both financially and aesthetically. Yvan is the neutral third party, at least in this early stage of the Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusand

Scene 3: At Serge’s Quotes

SERGE: You know Marc’s seen this painting.

YVAN: Oh?

SERGE: Devastated.

YVAN: Oh?

SERGE: He told me it was shit. A completely inappropriate description.

YVAN: Absolutely.

SERGE: You can’t call this shit.

YVAN: No.

SERGE: You can say, I don’t get it, I can’t grasp it, you can’t say “it’s shit.”

YVAN: You’ve seen his place.

SERGE: Nothing to see. It’s like yours, it’s… what I mean is, you couldn’t care less.

Related Characters: Serge (speaker), Yvan (speaker), Marc
Related Symbols: The Antrios Painting
Page Number and Citation: 14
Explanation and Analysis:
In this exchange, Serge and Yvan—who have just spent some time together considering the Antrios—discuss Marc’s violent reaction to the piece. Yvan has found himself drawn to the canvas for reasons he cannot explain—he knows that Marc hates the painting, but finds himself pulled to it and unable to support Marc’s position anymore. As Marc and Serge play a far-apart, competing game of tug-of-war, with Yvan in the middle, they each try to manipulate their changeable friend to see things from their point of view. Yvan has agreed with each of them separately, and Reza is laying the groundwork for Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem

SERGE: I don't blame him for not responding to this painting, he hasn't the training, there's a whole apprenticeship you have to go through, which he hasn't, either because he's never wanted to or because he has no particular instinct for it, none of that matters, no, what I blame him for is his tone of voice, his complacency, his tactlessness. I blame him for his insensitivity. I don't blame him for not being interested in modern Art, I couldn’t give a toss about that, I like him for other reasons . . .

YVAN: And he likes you!

SERGE: No, no, no, no, I felt it the other day, a kind of . . . a kind of condescension . . . contempt with a really bitter edge...

YVAN: No, surely not!

SERGE: Oh, yes! Don’t keep trying to smooth things over. Where d'you get this urge to be the great reconciler of the human race?! Why don't you admit that Marc is atrophying? If he hasn't already atrophied.

Related Characters: Serge (speaker), Yvan (speaker), Marc
Related Symbols: The Antrios Painting
Page Number and Citation: 15
Explanation and Analysis:
Just as Marc earlier tried to force Yvan to see that Serge had been taken in by snobbery and pretension, in this passage, Serge attempts to get the easily-influenced Yvan to admit that Marc, too, has begun to deteriorate (or “atrophy”) into a shadow of his former self. Serge is trying to get Yvan in the middle while also urging him not to act as a mediator. Both Marc and Serge are interested in the blank-slate quality their friend offers, but only want to use him to reflect their own point of view back to them—not to try and help Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolo

Scene 4: At Marc’s Quotes

MARC: He wasn't laughing because his painting is ridiculous, you and he weren't laughing for the same reasons, you were laughing at the painting and he was laughing to ingratiate himself, to put himself on your wavelength, to show you that on top of being an aesthete who can spend more on a painting than you earn in a year, he's still your same old subversive mate who likes a good laugh.

YVAN: Mm hm… You know. . .

MARC: Yes...

YVAN: This is going to amaze you…

MARC: Go on. . .

YVAN: I didn't like the painting . . . but I didn't actually hate it.

MARC: Well, of course. You can’t hate what's invisible, you can't hate nothing.

YVAN: No, no, it has something . . .

MARC: What do you mean?

YVAN: It has something. It's not nothing.

Related Characters: Marc (speaker), Yvan (speaker), Serge
Related Symbols: The Antrios Painting
Page Number and Citation: 17
Explanation and Analysis:
As Marc and Yvan rendezvous privately once again, after Yvan has had the chance to take a look at the Antrios painting, Marc expects that Yvan will side with him and agree that the painting is ridiculous, and that Serge has been corrupted by snobbery. When Yvan attempts to tell Marc that the Antrios made him feel something, however—that he did not see it as a ridiculous, offensive, and disturbing purchase—Marc realizes that his opinions, and thus his ego, are perhaps under greater attack than he imagined. Marc is beginning to feel as if he has lost control of his Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequunt

MARC: Why do I have to be so categorical? What possible difference can it make to me, if Serge lets himself be taken in by modern Art? I mean, it is a serious matter. But I could have found some other way to put it to him. I could have taken a less aggressive tone. Even if it makes me physically ill that my best friend has bought a white painting, all the same I ought to avoid attacking him about it. I ought to be nice to him. From now on, I’m on my best behavior.

Related Characters: Marc (speaker), Serge
Related Symbols: The Antrios Painting
Page Number and Citation: 20
Explanation and Analysis:
Marc’s ego has been bruised, but he still has enough of a rational mind to see that perhaps his attempts to berate Serge and manipulate Yvan have been heavy-handed and wrong, and have only worsened the situation. In this passage, he resolves to try and tamp down his outrage and be a good friend to both Serge and Yvan going forward. It’s important to note, though, that Marc doesn’t say anything about resolving his feelings or dealing with them—he simply plans to be “nice,” rather than kind, and on good behavior rather than interested in and empathetic towards his friends’ Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Ev

Scene 5: At Serge’s Quotes

SERGE: He is getting on my nerves. It's true. He's getting on my nerves. It's this ingratiating tone of voice. A little smile behind every word. It's as if he's forcing himself to be pleasant. Don't be pleasant, whatever you do, don't be pleasant! Could it be buying the Antrios? . . . Could buying the Antrios have triggered off this feeling of constraint between us? Buying something. . . without his backing? . . . Well, bugger his backing! Bugger your backing, Marc!

Related Characters: Serge (speaker), Marc
Related Symbols: The Antrios Painting
Page Number and Citation: 26
Explanation and Analysis:
As Marc and Serge sit at Serge’s flat waiting for Yvan to arrive, the two find themselves nitpicking one another’s words and snidely making digs at one another’s choices. Serge knows that there is a palpable strain between him and Marc, and resents Marc’s attempts to be pleasant—in other words, to be on his “best behavior.” It’s almost as if Serge would rather Marc rail against him than suppress his feelings and allow them to trickle out in the form of caustic, passive-aggressive remarks. As Serge attempts to get to the bottom of what has caused this new strain on Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut

MARC: Could it be the Antrios, buying the Antrios? No—It started some time ago… To be precise, it started on the day we were discussing some work of art and you uttered, quite seriously, the word deconstruction. It wasn’t so much the word deconstruction which upset me, it was the air of solemnity you imbued it with. You said, humorlessly, unapologetically, without a trace of irony, the word deconstruction, you, my friend. I wasn’t sure how best to deal with the situation, so I made this throwaway remark, and I said I think I must be getting intolerant, and you answered, who do you think you are?

What gives you the right to set yourself apart, Serge answered in the bloodiest possible way. And quite unexpectedly. You’re just Marc, what makes you think you’re so special? That day, I should have punched him in the mouth. And when he was lying there on the ground, half-dead, I should have said to him, what sort of friend are you, Serge, if you don’t think your friends are special?

Related Characters: Marc (speaker), Serge
Related Symbols: The Antrios Painting
Page Number and Citation: 27
Explanation and Analysis:
As Marc, in a private monologue, attempts—just like Serge—to figure out the root of the constraint between them, he looks back on their relationship to see what went wrong, and where. He sees that it is not the purchase of the Antrios, but Serge’s earlier slide into pretension and condescension which first put a rift between them. During their argument about the nature of pretension, Serge asked Marc what made him “special,” and Marc was deeply hurt by Serge’s inability to see or understand what makes his friends special. Marc reveals himself to be motivated by deeper pain and fear Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit.

SERGE: There’s no problem, except for you, because you take pride in your desire to shut yourself off from humanity. And you’ll never manage it. It’s like you’re in quicksand, the more you struggle to get out of it, the deeper you sink.

Related Characters: Serge (speaker), Marc
Related Symbols: The Antrios Painting
Page Number and Citation: 38
Explanation and Analysis:
In this passage, the incensed Serge reveals the flip side of Marc’s argument in the previous quotation. Serge didn’t think Marc deserved to set himself apart and hold himself above the attempt to engage in aesthetic or intellectual discourse, and Marc interpreted this as Serge refusing to see Marc as "special.” Here, Serge reveals that he feels Marc’s attempt to differentiate his own pretensions from Serge’s pretensions is actually Marc attempting to shut himself off from all of humanity—Serge sees his own pretensions as more valuable and less ridiculous than Marc’s. This is the crux of the two men’s problems Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recu

YVAN: “If I’m who I am because I’m who I am and you’re who you are because you’re who you are, then I’m who I am and you’re who you are. If, on the other hand, I’m who I am because you’re who you are, and if you’re who you are because I am who I am, then I’m not who I am and you’re not who you are…” You see why I had to write it down.

Related Characters: Yvan (speaker), Marc, Serge
Page Number and Citation: 41-42
Explanation and Analysis:
Yvan reveals to Marc and Serge that he has brought them up in his session with his therapist, whom Marc and Serge find ridiculous. Despite their protests, Yvan shares something his therapist said about the relationship between the two. Though comically obtuse and labyrinthine, what this note actually details is the danger of codependency. If one forms their own opinions and ideals in a friendship and allows the other friend or partner to do so as well, then the two will each genuinely be who they are and allow the other to be as well. If not, however—if one’s opinions Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaq

MARC: It’s true I can’t imagine you genuinely loving that painting.

YVAN: But why?

MARC: Because I love Serge and I can’t love the Serge who’s capable of buying that painting.

SERGE: Why do you say buying, why don’t you say loving?

MARC: Because I can’t say loving, I can’t believe loving.

SERGE: So why would I buy it, if I didn’t love it?

MARC: That’s the nub of the question.

SERGE: (to YVAN) See how smug he is! All I’m doing is teasing him, and his answer is this serenely pompous heavy hint! And it never crossed your mind, [Marc,] for a second, however improbably it might seem, that I might really love it and that your vicious, inflexible opinions and your disgusting assumption[s] might be hurtful to me?

MARC: No.

Related Characters: Marc (speaker), Yvan (speaker), Serge (speaker)
Related Symbols: The Antrios Painting
Page Number and Citation: 45
Explanation and Analysis:
Marc is so self-absorbed, so consumed by his ego, so convinced of the veracity of his opinions that he cannot imagine that anyone could love the Antrios. Though Serge—and Yvan—have repeatedly professed their genuine love of and connection to the painting, Marc has continued to condescendingly berate it as an object of pretension and a symbol of the dulling or deterioration of his friends’ opinions and ideals. Serge tells Marc, in this passage, that he is genuinely hurt by Marc’s “inflexibility” and “disgusting assumptions,” but even in the face of this genuine emotional plea, Marc remains staunch, detached, and cruel Dolorem et quae. Exerc

MARC: Do you think what you just said about Paula?

SERGE: Worse, actually.

MARC: Worse, Serge? Worse than repellent?

SERGE: Aha! When it’s something that concerns you personally, I see words can bite a little deeper!

MARC: Serge, will you explain how someone can be worse than repellent…

SERGE: No need to take that frosty tone. Perhaps it’s—let me try and answer you—perhaps it’s the way she waves away cigarette smoke. What appears to you a gesture of no significance, what you think of as a harmless gesture is in fact the opposite, and the way she waves away cigarette smoke sits right at the heart of her repellentness.

Related Characters: Marc (speaker), Serge (speaker)
Related Symbols: The Antrios Painting
Page Number and Citation: 46
Explanation and Analysis:
In this passage, Serge flips the tables on Marc, who has been berating him for liking the “piece of shit,” “nothing” Antrios. Serge has a genuine attachment to the painting, and for hours now—days, even—Marc has done nothing but belittle the painting as stupid, ridiculous, and repellent. Sick of the abuse, Serge now, in an attempt to level the playing field and give Marc a taste of his own medicine, invokes Marc’s girlfriend Paula as an object of “repellentness” just for the sake of showing Marc how much it hurts when something one loves is dragged through the mud because Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Opt

MARC: There was a time you were proud to be my friend… You congratulated yourself on my peculiarity, on my taste for standing apart. You enjoyed exhibiting me untamed to your circle, you, whose life was so normal. I was your alibi. But…eventually, I supposed, that sort of affection dries up… Belatedly, you claim your independence. But I detest your independence. Its violence. You’ve abandoned me. I’ve been betrayed. As far as I’m concerned, you’re a traitor.

SERGE (to YVAN): If I understand correctly, he was my mentor! And if I loved you as my mentor…what was the nature of your feelings?

MARC: I enjoyed your admiration. I was flattered. I was always grateful to you for thinking of me as a man apart. I even thought being a man apart was a somehow superior condition, until one day you pointed out to me that it wasn’t.

SERGE: This is very alarming.

MARC: It’s the truth.

Related Characters: Marc (speaker), Serge (speaker)
Related Symbols: The Antrios Painting
Page Number and Citation: 52
Explanation and Analysis:
In this passage, which forms in many ways the heart and the crux of the extended argument between Marc and Serge, Marc reveals that he reveled in the knowledge that Serge was entirely codependent upon him for his opinions. Serge’s pride in showing Marc off inflated Marc’s ego and gave him a sense of accomplishment, and now that Serge has grown independent, Marc is no longer given the distinction of having made Serge into who he is today. Marc, no longer able to glean a sense of pride from Serge’s appreciation of him, feels abandoned, suddenly struck by a lack Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae

SERGE: Why can’t you learn to love people for themselves, Marc?

MARC: What does that mean, for themselves?

SERGE: For what they are.

MARC: But what are they?! What are they?! Apart from my faith in them I’m desperate to find a friend who has some kind of prior existence. So far, I’ve had no luck. I’ve had to mold you… But you see, it never works. There comes a day when your creature goes off and buys a white painting.

Related Characters: Serge (speaker), Marc (speaker)
Related Symbols: The Antrios Painting
Page Number and Citation: 54
Explanation and Analysis:
There is a fundamental crack in the friendship between Marc, Serge, and Yvan. The men, who once (seemingly) loved one another for who they were, now find their friendship rent asunder by their inability to accept the changes that they have each undergone. Marc—his fragile ego and sense of self on the verge of being obliterated by Serge’s purchase of the Antrios painting—reveals that his love for his friends is and perhaps always has been conditional, based on the presumption that he would be able to “mold” them into people he wanted to love and to be around. He laments Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste

YVAN: I’m not like you, I don’t want to be an authority figure, I don’t want to be a point of reference, I don’t want to be self-sufficient, I just want to be your friend Yvan the joker! Yvan the joker!

SERGE: Could we try to steer clear of pathos?

YVAN: I’ve finished. Haven’t you got any nibbles? Anything, just to stop from passing out.

SERGE: I have some olives.

YVAN: Hand them over.

Serge reaches for a little bowl of olives and hands it to him.

SERGE (to MARC): Want some?

Marc nods. Yvan hands him the bowl. They eat olives.

Related Characters: Marc (speaker), Serge (speaker), Yvan (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 59
Explanation and Analysis:
As the cruelty of the evening subsides and makes way for devastating emotion, Serge finds himself almost unable to stand any real display of sadness, longing, or sensitivity. He has been so numbed to these things by the hours of discord that Yvan’s plea for peace is repellent and even offensive to him. Nevertheless, something about Yvan’s emotional crescendo breaks through, as the friends relax their anger and enjoy a small bowl of olives together. The olives are a metaphor for peace, in some measure at least, having been achieved at last—not a literal olive branch, but still a symbol Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt

Scene 6: At Serge’s Quotes

YVAN: The day after the wedding, at the Montparnasse cemetery Catherine put a bouquet and a bag of sugared almonds on her mother’s grave. In the evening, thinking about this tribute, I started sobbing in my bed. I absolutely must speak to Finkelzohn about my tendency to cry, I cry all the time, it’s not normal for someone my age. It started, or at least revealed itself at Serge’s, the evening of the white painting. After Serge, in an act of pure madness, had demonstrated to Marc that he cared more about him than he did about his painting, we went and had dinner. Over dinner, Serge and Marc took the decision to try to rebuild a relationship destroyed by word and deed. One of them used to expression “trial period” and I burst into tears. I can no longer bear any kind of rational argument, nothing formative in the world, nothing great or beautiful in the world has ever been born of rational argument.

Related Characters: Yvan (speaker), Marc, Serge
Related Symbols: The Antrios Painting
Page Number and Citation: 61-62
Explanation and Analysis:
In the wake of the momentous fight on the night of the white painting, Yvan has found himself susceptible to if not random then at least uncontrollable bouts of crying. He is moved to tears by any kind of tenderness now, having witnessed such cruelty and callousness, and at the same time is so exhausted by his friends’ attempts to rationalize that cruelty to one another that he can no longer bear rational thought of any kind. Yvan, as always, just wants the best for his friends—but his ability to act as a go-between, a mediator, or a referee has Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores

SERGE: When Marc and I succeeded in obliterating the skier, with the aid of Swiss soap with added ox gall, recommended by Paula, I looked at the Antrios and turned to Marc:

“Did you know ink from felt-tips was washable?”

“No,” Marc said… “No, did you?”

“No,” I said, very fast, lying. I came within an inch of saying yes, I did know. But how could I have launched our trial period with such a disappointing admission? On the other hand, was it right to start with a lie? A lie! Let’s be reasonable. Why am I so absurdly virtuous? Why does my relationship with Marc have to be so complicated?

Related Characters: Serge (speaker), Marc
Related Symbols: The Antrios Painting
Page Number and Citation: 62-63
Explanation and Analysis:
Serge’s gesture of allowing Marc to draw on the Antrios seemed to be one of love and desperation combined. As Serge realized that the painting was destroying his and Marc’s friendship—and their relationship with Yvan, as well—Serge volunteered to allow Marc to deface the painting that was effectively breaking them apart. In this private monologue delivered to the audience, however, Serge reveals that he knew all along that the ink would wash off—and implies that if he hadn’t, he would never have let Marc draw on it. Thus, it remains unclear if his relationship with Marc is actually more valuable Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam offi

MARC: Under the white clouds, the snow is falling. You can’t see the white clouds, or the snow. Or the cold, or the white glow of the earth. A solitary man glides downhill on his skis. The snow is falling. It falls until the man disappears back into the landscape.

My friend Serge, who’s one of my oldest friends, has bought a painting. It’s a canvas about five foot by four. It represents a man who moves across a space and disappears.

Related Characters: Marc (speaker), Serge
Related Symbols: The Antrios Painting
Page Number and Citation: 63
Explanation and Analysis:
As the play concludes, Marc steps forward to finally, after all the fighting and all the pain, offer up his interpretation of what the Antrios represents. Marc has resisted feeling any attachment to the painting or even seeing it as a viable piece of art, but now, he reveals that it does mean something to him—and has possibly held meaning for him all along. The disappearing man Marc perceives in the white haze of the painting could represent any—or all—of the three friends. Marc has disappeared into his own ego and self-pity; Serge has disappeared into his pretensions; Yvan has Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde
No matches.