Previous
Terms
The philosophical movement Sartre espouses. Its fundamental proposition is the notion that existence precedes essence, which means that people are born without a fixed identity or purpose, and they form themselves and their lives through their actions alone. As a result of what Sartre calls the human condition—that people act as a subject within the constraints of an environment—Sartre argues that there are no absolute moral truths, and indeed that human life is only possible insofar as people recognize their freedom over their own choices and their responsibility for the outcome of those choices. While scholars have offered various definitions of existentialism with various historical scopes, the narrowest definition includes Sartre, as well as fellow French philosophers Albert Camus, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Gabriel Marcel, and Simone de Beauvoir (who was Sartre’s partner in the later part of their lives). Most commentators (including Sartre here) also include philosophers Søren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, and Karl Jaspers, as well as novelist Fyodor Dostoyevsky, as either early existentialists or precursors to existentialism.
Existentialism Quotes in Existentialism Is a Humanism
The Existentialism Is a Humanism quotes below are all either spoken by Existentialism or refer to Existentialism. For each quote, you can also see the other terms and themes related to it (each theme is indicated by its own dot and icon, like this one:
).
Existentialism Is a Humanism Quotes
Many will be surprised by what l have to say here about humanism. We shall attempt to discover in what sense we understand it. In any case, let us begin by saying that what we mean by “existentialism” is a doctrine that makes human life possible and also affirms that every truth and every action imply an environment and a human subjectivity.
Related Characters:
Related Themes:
Page Number and Citation:
Explanation and Analysis:
After outlining some of the principal criticisms of existentialism, Sartre addresses his audience’s relation to those criticisms head-on: he openly notes the conventional idea that existentialism is anti-humanist because humanism sees human beings as inherently valuable and good, whereas existentialism believes there are no inherent values. Here, Sartre is foreshadowing his argument at the end of the lecture that existentialism is a new kind of humanism, one grounded in the universal condition of “an environment and a human subjectivity” and oriented toward facilitating the universal human striving for moral authenticity—the striving that “makes human life possible”—rather than some speculative theory Dolorem et quae.
It makes me wonder if what they are really annoyed about is not its pessimism, but rather its optimism. For when all is said and done, could it be that what frightens them about the doctrine that I shall try to present to you here is that it offers man the possibility of individual choice?
Related Characters:
Related Themes:
Page Number and Citation:
Explanation and Analysis:
This is Sartre’s initial response to the public’s belief, influenced most of all by the Christian critics, that existentialism is a pessimistic doctrine obsessed with humanity’s moral failings and reluctant to commit itself to any positive picture of the human good. Sartre’s response is to invert the accusation by suggesting that what really makes a moral system optimistic is the space it leaves for people to take control over their own destinies. He foreshadows his later suggestion that his critics are acting in bad faith out of fear, in order to avoid the confrontation with their own subjectivity that existentialism Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perfere
The truth is that of all doctrines, this is the least scandalous and the most austere: it is strictly intended for specialists and philosophers.
Related Characters:
Related Themes:
Page Number and Citation:
Explanation and Analysis:
There is a certain irony to this statement, since Sartre knows his work and personality were already considered scandalous and indulgent in the public eye. But existentialism also literally is the “least scandalous” and “most austere” mode of thought in terms of its fundamental beliefs: whereas other philosophies have (according to Sartre, bad) faith in invisible metaphysical claims, Sartre sees atheist existentialists as especially resistant to believing anything people cannot reasonably believe based on their experience. This refusal to speculate beyond demonstrable truths is the despair that helps existentialists make more honest and practical decisions. Sartre is also careful to Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Duci
Dostoyevsky once wrote: “If God does not exist, everything is permissible.” This is the starting point of existentialism. Indeed, everything is permissible if God does not exist, and man is consequently abandoned, for he cannot find anything to rely on—neither within nor without.
Related Characters:
Related Themes:
Page Number and Citation:
Explanation and Analysis:
Dostoyevsky’s statement provides a clear and concise statement of what Sartre calls “abandonment.” It may seem confusing that Sartre calls this abandonment the “starting point of existentialism,” since he has already explained his doctrine by starting from the idea that, for humans, existence precedes essence. However, these two statements amount to one and the same thing: there is no preexisting formula for living human life “correctly” (nothing from “without” to rely on) and no preexisting human nature that determines what a person will or should do in any given instance (nothing “within” to rely on). Whereas the Christian existentialist Dostoyevsky Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde en
Get the entire Existentialism Is a Humanism LitChart as a printable PDF.
"My students can't get enough of your charts and their results have gone through the roof." -Graham S.
Existentialism Term Timeline in Existentialism Is a Humanism
The timeline below shows where the term Existentialism appears in Existentialism Is a Humanism. The colored dots and icons indicate which themes are associated with that appearance.
Existentialism Is a Humanism
Sartre opens his lecture by declaring his goal: “to defend existentialism against some charges that have been brought against it.” He names four charges: two from...
(full context)
...on the lecture’s title by acknowledging that his audience might be surprised that Sartre sees existentialism as a kind of humanism. This is largely because the public mistakenly views existentialism as...
(full context)
Sartre then tries to more explicitly define “existentialism.” He suggests that the public uses the term as a fashionable insult rather than actually...
(full context)
...reflect a view of what is “good” for humanity as a whole. Sartre argues that existentialism’s “fundamental meaning” lies in the fact that people cannot overcome this condition of subjectivity. Sartre...
(full context)
...work out in their favor. He then addresses the Communist objection that this means that existentialism cannot accommodate solidarity, since, to be effective in their actions, people have to rely on...
(full context)
Sartre sums up his core belief that “reality alone counts” and recapitulates his contention that existentialism’s critics are actually attacking its optimism rather than its pessimism. This is because existentialism blames...
(full context)
Sartre agrees that existentialism starts with individual subjectivity and specifies that its foundational truth is Descartes’s famous I think,...
(full context)
Sartre turns to the three remaining criticisms of existentialism, which also center on its subjectivism. The next objection is that existentialism makes all values...
(full context)
The next criticism is that, under existentialism, people would not have a way to judge others. Sartre responds that the existentialist subject...
(full context)
Sartre finally turns to the lecture’s title by addressing existentialism’s relationship to humanism. He says there are two things “humanism” can mean. The first is...
(full context)
Sartre concludes by portraying existentialism as “an attempt to draw all of the conclusions inferred by a consistently atheistic point...
(full context)
