Fear and Trembling

by

Søren Kierkegaard

Teachers and parents! Our Teacher Edition on Fear and Trembling makes teaching easy.

Fear and Trembling: Preamble from the Heart Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
Johannes states that the temporal world is imperfect—frequently hard work isn’t enough to earn the same social status and wealth that some of the laziest people enjoy. The spirit world, however, is dominated by divine justice and everyone must work for what they want. Johannes proclaims that modern wisdom says it’s enough to know of God in general in order to reap the benefits, and that no other work is necessary. However, people who adhere to this belief starve even though everything around them “is transformed into gold.” Abraham’s story is unique because it’s even inspiring to people who don’t really understand it. People must work hard to understand either Abraham or his story, but few people are willing to do this. As a result, they refer to Isaac as the “best” Abraham had instead of by his name.
Johannes highlights the ultimate meaninglessness of material wealth if it’s not supplemented with faith. A person’s external life might be “transformed into gold,” but if they don’t also have faith in God, then they won’t have the same kind of happiness as even the poorest person who does have faith. Johannes also points out a strange habit that people who tell Abraham’s story have: they call Isaac the “best” Abraham had instead of referring to Isaac by name. This helps them distance themselves from the true horror of what God was asking Abraham to sacrifice: his son.
Themes
Belief vs. Doubt Theme Icon
Faith and the Absurd Theme Icon
Quotes
Johannes writes that there’s something that people leave out of Abraham’s story: the anguish he must have felt knowing he had to sacrifice Isaac. Because that anguish makes people uncomfortable, they use the terms “Isaac” and “best” interchangeably, and the danger is that someone hearing the story told that way might want to prove their faith by making a similar sacrifice, which horrifies the preacher who told them the story. They do this because the preacher left out Abraham’s faith and his anguish at hearing what God wanted him to do. There is a contradiction here: what Abraham did made him great, but when the listener tries to do the same thing they’re vilified. Ethically speaking, Abraham was willing to murder Isaac; when one takes Abraham’s faith into account, however, the expression changes to that he was willing to sacrifice Isaac. Therein lies the difference between Abraham and the listener: faith.
The mistake Johannes describes highlights how difficult it is for people to understand faith. Because they don’t understand it, it’s difficult for them to talk about it; because they don’t talk about it, people get the wrong idea about why Abraham’s actions were justifiable. What they also seem to forget, according to Johannes’s account, is that God asked Abraham to sacrifice Isaac in particular, but this is also due to the fact that they consider the terms “best” and “Isaac” interchangeable. All of this emphasizes how important it is not to shy away from the darker details about Abraham’s story—the truth, even when it’s uncomfortable, is important.
Themes
Belief vs. Doubt Theme Icon
Faith and the Absurd Theme Icon
Infinite Resignation Theme Icon
The Unintelligibility of Faith Theme Icon
Quotes
Johannes says that the only safe way to talk about Abraham’s story is to make his faith the “main thing,” not the willingness or the act of preparing to sacrifice Isaac. Johannes writes that if he were to be in charge of sharing Abraham’s story, it would take several Sundays as he dwelled over how devout Abraham had to be to be chosen by God to make such an immense sacrifice and the great love Abraham had for Isaac. If any of his listeners still felt tempted to sacrifice their own sons as a sign of faith, Johannes would follow them and do his best to talk them out of it and realize their error, all the while asserting that not even he truly has faith.
Faith is both the “main thing” of Abraham’s story and of Fear and Trembling. This is particularly notable because Johannes says he doesn’t actually have faith himself, which makes his perspective and beliefs about faith unique. He can’t speak through personal experience, only through what he feels in his heart. This also shows that even though technically anyone can have faith, not everyone is cut out for taking the necessary steps toward developing it.
Themes
Belief vs. Doubt Theme Icon
Faith and the Absurd Theme Icon
Infinite Resignation Theme Icon
The Unintelligibility of Faith Theme Icon
Quotes
The topic of love receives endless attention from poets, but nobody gives the same amount of attention to faith. Philosophy and theology leave faith in the dust, which is why Johannes believes it’s easy to “go beyond” Abraham but nearly impossible to go further than Hegel. For Johannes’ part, he finds it easy to understand Hegel, but impossible to understand Abraham. Johannes assures his audience that he is no stranger to greatness, and that he can visualize himself as a great hero, but he can’t relate in the same way to Abraham. This is because Abraham had true faith, which is something Johannes lacks. Although Johannes can face horrible things without flinching, he doesn’t have the courage to take the next step into faith like Abraham. So, although he loves God, he doesn’t have faith.
Hegel was an important philosopher in the 19th century, and here Johannes uses him to represent philosophy in general. Philosophy, then, is where people turn when they “go beyond” faith (represented by Abraham). Unfortunately, philosophy often leads to religious doubt as people turn all of their attention to temporal matters and away from the eternal. The fact that Johannes professes to love God without faith also brings up an important point: simple belief in or love for God isn’t the same as faith, and shouldn’t be confused as such.
Themes
Belief vs. Doubt Theme Icon
Faith and the Absurd Theme Icon
Quotes
Get the entire Fear and Trembling LitChart as a printable PDF.
Fear and Trembling PDF
Johannes says that he prefers to talk about Abraham’s story as if it recently happened so the only distance between the two is Abraham’s greatness and Johannes’ lack thereof. Johannes says that if God asked him to make the same sacrifice as Abraham then he would have done it, but he would have seen it as sacrificing all his hope for joy in this world (although he’d still believe in God’s love). While some people might say this is more commendable than Abraham’s “narrow-mindedness,” Johannes says it would only be a substitute for faith. More importantly, Johannes doesn’t think he could have accepted Isaac back as easily and joyfully as Abraham did—the pain would be too difficult for Johannes to overcome. Abraham, however, truly believed “on the strength of the absurd” that God would not really take Isaac away if Abraham proved he was willing to give him. 
Johannes states that other people might see Abraham’s faith as “narrow-mindedness,” again highlighting how unintelligible faith can be to people who have none themselves. This is because faith requires believing in the “absurd.” The absurd is something that people who are primarily guided by reason can’t fathom or understand; it belongs to the realm of the impossible. People with faith, then, believe in the impossible. In Abraham’s case, the absurd is believing that even if he sacrifices Isaac, he won’t really lose him.
Themes
Belief vs. Doubt Theme Icon
Faith and the Absurd Theme Icon
Infinite Resignation Theme Icon
The Unintelligibility of Faith Theme Icon
Johannes proposes to take the story one step further and imagine that Abraham really did sacrifice Isaac. Still, Abraham would have believed that God would give him Isaac back to enjoy in this life. That is what faith is—giving up everything and, in the same instant, taking it all back by believing it will come back in this world. Johannes says that if Abraham had changed one thing—sacrificing Isaac at home instead of following God’s command to the letter, for instance—then Johannes wouldn’t admire him as much. As it is, Abraham followed directions and joyfully received Isaac back (another testament to his faith; if he hadn’t been joyful, then his faith wouldn’t have been real). Abraham moved past infinite resignation and now stands at the extreme of faith, and so Johannes can’t entirely understand him.
Abraham joyfully receives Isaac back after demonstrating his willingness to sacrifice him like God asked, which is a sharp contrast with what Johannes said he’d feel in the same situation. Johannes said he’d struggle to receive Isaac back joyfully, which means he wouldn’t have believed that Isaac could come back, hence he doesn’t have faith. Furthermore, any deviance between Abraham’s actions and God’s request would have revealed some kind of doubt or hesitation on Abraham’s part, which is why Johannes wouldn’t have been able to admire him to the same degree as he currently does.
Themes
Belief vs. Doubt Theme Icon
Faith and the Absurd Theme Icon
Infinite Resignation Theme Icon
The Unintelligibility of Faith Theme Icon
Quotes
Johannes writes that if anyone feels like they have become faithful after hearing the outcome of Abraham’s story, then they are deceiving themselves or possibly trying to cheat God by claiming they have faith without going through all the spiritual movements to develop it. Some people might succeed in this because in the modern day, everyone tries to go further than faith. Johannes asks if it wouldn’t be better for people to stop at faith and then direct their energy towards keeping it. He also explains that while he can’t make all the movements of faith himself, he admires the people who do. His observations have shown him how to differentiate between a knight of infinite resignation by their boldness, and a person of true faith (who often seems like an average member of the middle class).
It is notable that Johannes thinks that people who have faith are simultaneously great because of their faith, but also wholly unremarkable. Their faith isn’t entirely obvious, they don’t wear it on their sleeve and show it off—they look and act like average people. On the other hand, people who have gotten to the step of infinite resignation are noticeable because they wear it boldly.
Themes
Belief vs. Doubt Theme Icon
Faith and the Absurd Theme Icon
Infinite Resignation Theme Icon
Quotes
Although Johannes has never met a true knight of faith, he believes that if he ever did, then he’d divide his time between admiring them and practicing the spiritual movements that lead to faith. Johannes states that a typical knight of faith would lead a wholly unremarkable life and it’d be almost impossible to pick them out of a crowd based on appearances, and yet all they do. A knight of faith has renounced whatever is most important to him, but they still find as much happiness in this world as if they never had to give up a thing. What’s more, the knight of faith is always making this movement—infinite resignation and then getting it all back through faith. Johannes likens it to a ballet dancer gracefully leaping and making a perfect landing. Knights of faith do it gracefully enough that most people don’t even realize they’re doing it.
Johannes has already conveyed that he’d be able to recognize a knight of faith, but here he says that he’s never met one. This calls into question whether he (who admittedly lacks faith and therefore can’t totally understand it) would truly recognize faith if he saw it. Still, Johannes is devoted to the idea of a knight of faith because if he found one then he could get to know them better and maybe even learn better how to make the spiritual movements toward faith.
Themes
Faith and the Absurd Theme Icon
Infinite Resignation Theme Icon
Quotes
Johannes says he wants to illustrate these movements by telling a story about a young man who falls in love with a princess. The man’s whole life is bound up in his love for the princess, but it’s impossible for him to marry her. If the man is a knight of infinite resignation, then after a good deal of thought over the impossibility of the relationship, he will renounce the relationship and reconcile himself to the pain. However, that doesn’t mean he’ll move on or be jealous of anything the princess does—his love becomes eternal and transcends the temporal. It’s still his life’s substance, but he loves her without hope that they’ll be united in this life. Anyone can make this movement of infinite resignation and achieve peace through it, but it is still only a step (albeit the final one) before faith.
Here, Johannes illustrates an important characteristic of a knight of infinite resignation. They’ve sacrificed something very important to them, but they don’t then spend the rest of their lives being bitter and angry. Like a knight of faith, they reconcile themselves to the pain, and in a way they move on because they are still able to live a happy life—they just don’t believe they’ll ever get the thing they sacrificed back in this world.
Themes
Faith and the Absurd Theme Icon
Infinite Resignation Theme Icon
Johannes moves on to describe how the young man would handle the situation as a knight of faith. He would go through the same process of renunciation and reconcile himself to its pain, but he goes one step further and declares that he believes he’ll still get the princess back in this life “on the strength of the absurd.” Here, Johannes explains that the absurd isn’t anything that can be “embraced by understanding,” but something much more complex. According to all human understanding, it is impossible for the man and the princess to be together, but he nevertheless believes that they will. The knight of faith recognizes the impossibility and still grasps onto the absurd—that the impossible can and will happen in this life—and through it discovers the faith which will comfort and bring him joy.
The difference between a knight of faith and a knight of infinite resignation seems simple, but, as Johannes explains, the step from infinite resignation to faith is complicated, scary, and difficult to take. This is because it requires believing and trusting in the absurd, which can’t be “embraced by understanding.” In other words, it defies logic and seems wholly impossible and even crazy to anyone who doesn’t have faith.
Themes
Faith and the Absurd Theme Icon
Infinite Resignation Theme Icon
Quotes
Johannes states that faith is something more than a purely “aesthetic emotion” that one develops all in a second without taking the proper steps. For this reason, even an innocent young girl who’s been raised to be a faithful Christian and believes in God doesn’t necessarily have faith, although she has certainty. Johannes says that he can see that that the movement of infinite resignation can be done, but the movement from that to faith baffles him. What he does know is that certainty or conviction is not equal to faith when it comes to facing the impossible. The first movement—that of resignation—doesn’t require faith, but rather opens the door to it by creating an “eternal consciousness.” Resignation means renouncing everything, but through faith one can receive it all over again and find happiness with it in this world.
An “aesthetic emotion” is one that, compared to faith, is just skin-deep. It looks good, and it’s a good emotion to have, but it’s not one that people typically internalize. Johannes again refers to “eternal consciousness,” which he’s previously said helps give life greater meaning. The young girl Johannes describes is similar to Johannes in that she believes in God, but unlike Johannes she confuses certainty with faith. Johannes, however, has a superior understanding of faith and so he knows he doesn’t have it.
Themes
Belief vs. Doubt Theme Icon
Faith and the Absurd Theme Icon
Infinite Resignation Theme Icon
Quotes
Johannes writes that he is strong enough to renounce everything temporal, especially if he continues to love God more than worldly joy. However, this takes strength, and Johannes says he spends all his strength on continually renouncing things. However, faith declares that he can simultaneously get it all back. Unfortunately, Johannes is unable to make the movement into faith, although he knows it must be wonderful to experience the same peace and confidence as a knight of faith who believes they’ll receive everything back on the strength of the absurd.
Johannes again makes it clear that even though he’s talking about faith, it’s not something he has, as he is unable to take the necessary steps to develop it. This is meant to convey how difficult faith is to have—even those who want it can’t always find it.
Themes
Belief vs. Doubt Theme Icon
Faith and the Absurd Theme Icon
Infinite Resignation Theme Icon
Referring to his original observation that many modern people want to “go further” than faith, Johannes wonders if it’s possible that his generation really has grasped faith and, if they have, why they are still so unwilling to stop at it. Johannes himself can’t understand this unwillingness—if he were able to develop real faith, he would flaunt it by driving in a carriage. Johannes again says that he can’t make the final movement of faith (not out of any unwillingness, but a lack of courage), but he insists that nobody has the right to portray faith as something easy to develop or inferior to anything because it’s the hardest and yet greatest thing of all. 
Johannes has already stated that the modern world—to him, 19th-century Europe—is materialistic, so if a knight of faith seems like a regular middle-class person, then it follows that they may also be somewhat materialistic. This is perhaps why Johannes says he would flaunt his faith by driving a carriage. Overall, though, what Johannes is getting at here is the idea that having faith should be something to be proud of and to flaunt—not something to want to move past.
Themes
Faith and the Absurd Theme Icon
Johannes returns to Abraham, saying that many people focus on the ending and skip over the three-day long journey he had to take, knowing where it would end and even knowing that he could change his mind. According to Johannes, Abraham’s story should be either entirely forgotten or the modern age must try to really understand it. Johannes says that if he were to tell the story, he would focus on the pain of the trial, emphasizing that it lasted days and not just a moment, and in that way hopefully dissuade them from any temptation to prove their faith in a similar way. Johannes goes on to say that he’s going to further discuss Abraham’s story by exploring several questions to illustrate the power of faith and how it can’t truly be understood because it “begins precisely where thinking leaves off.”
Johannes doubles down on his claim that the most important part of Abraham’s story is the journey between his home and Mount Moriah with Isaac. Even though this is the part of Abraham’s trial that took the longest, it’s the part that receives the least attention. By emphasizing that the journey took days and that Abraham would have been quietly suffering the whole time, Johannes hopes to make people realize that they can’t take the shortcut straight to sacrificing something to prove their faith—it requires time, thought, and perseverance.
Themes
Faith and the Absurd Theme Icon
Infinite Resignation Theme Icon
The Unintelligibility of Faith Theme Icon