Foe

by

J. M. Coetzee

Teachers and parents! Our Teacher Edition on Foe makes teaching easy.

Foe: Part 3 Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
Susan climbs the stairs, with Friday in tow, to Mr. Foe’s new lodgings in Whitechapel. She is surprised to find that the apartment is so clean, when she was expecting it to be dusty—but then again, she muses, “life is never as we expect it to be.” She wonders if she will know how to recognize the afterlife when she arrives there; “after death we may find ourselves not among choirs of angels but in some quite ordinary place, as for instance a bath-house on a hot afternoon.” 
Months ago, Susan had marveled that reality was so like “the pictures we have in our minds”; now, she changes her tune, feeling that reality is untrustworthy. As someone preoccupied with gaining enduring fame and life through art, Susan now begins to wonder if eternity, too, will feel like the island—boring and repetitive and aimless.
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Embellishment vs. Deception Theme Icon
Gender and Creation Theme Icon
Immediately, Susan presses Mr. Foe to say how the “history” of her and Cruso’s time on the island is progressing. Mr. Foe replies that writing is slow, because it is “a slow story.” He asks Susan to give more details about her time in Bahia, but she is hesitant to do so, explaining that Bahia is not a part of the story she wants to tell. Nevertheless, she tells Mr. Foe a few details: about the city’s system of cables and pulleys for shipping cargo, about the widespread presence of prostitutes, and about the variety of precious metals that are illegally trafficked.
For the first time in the novel, Susan is not the sole speaker—and so someone is there to challenge her omissions and contradictions. The use of the word “history” is also worth noting, as it implies that the story Foe and Susan are working on is strictly truthful—even though Susan has openly admitted to embellishing.
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Embellishment vs. Deception Theme Icon
Mr. Foe then asks Susan if Friday ever desired her, to which Susan responds, “how are we ever to know what goes on in the heart of Friday?” So Mr. Foe switches back to asking about Bahia, even though Susan protests that Bahia is “not the island” and therefore not worth Mr. Foe’s time. 
Mr. Foe is more curious about Friday’s psyche than Susan is—but is his curiosity genuine, or does he just see Friday’s story as a potential source of narrative profit? 
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
But now Mr. Foe reveals that he has a very different plan for the story in mind: to him, the story begins in London, with the kidnapping (or was it escape?) of Susan’s daughter. His book will then follow Susan through her years in Bahia, before switching its focus to Susan’s daughter, who has returned to Europe in search of her mother.
Susan is determined to keep the focus on the island, but Foe does not seem interested in the island at all. While we never learn who wins this debate, the content of the real Robinson Crusoe suggests that Susan never gave any further details about Brazil; Defoe’s real-life novel barely leaves the island (and does not touch at all on Susan’s story).
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Get the entire Foe LitChart as a printable PDF.
Foe PDF
Foe continues his story: when the girl arrives back in Europe, she is sad to learn that Susan is nowhere to be found—until she hears about a female castaway, recently returned with a Black slave. “Loss, then quest, then recovery; beginning, then middle, then end,” Foe explains to Susan.
Though Susan resents Foe for so blatantly trying to rewrite her history, he, too, is acting like a “painter,” rearranging or condensing events into a structure that is more convenient for him. 
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Embellishment vs. Deception Theme Icon
Susan begins to panic at this change to her own lived narrative, especially when Foe doubles down on his assertion that the island is not interesting on its own because it “lacks light and shade.” Frustrated, Susan replies that “the shadow whose lack you feel it is there: it is the loss of Friday’s tongue.” Following her own logic, Susan then concludes that the island story will not be complete until she somehow figures out how to give voice to Friday.
The painting metaphor continues in this discussion about light and shade. Interestingly, Susan can almost, but not entirely, admit the role that slavery plays in her story; though the brutality Friday has encountered casts a “shadow” over the whole story, Susan does not ever actually name the source of this shadow.
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
Gender and Creation Theme Icon
Susan then elaborates on the story of Friday’s dancing, confessing that she had omitted a key detail before: Friday is missing his actual tongue, but the word “tongue” is also a metaphor for Friday’s genitalia. Susan had long suspected that this might be the case, but her suspicions were confirmed when she came downstairs at Stoke Newington to see Friday dancing, bare naked save for his wig and his open robes.
Now, again, it is difficult to tell whether Susan is lying or being truthful. On the one hand, it makes sense that she would find this information private and therefore inappropriate to share—but at the same time, if Friday is in fact missing his genitalia, why would Susan not have offered up that knowledge anytime a conversation about Friday’s sex life came up?
Themes
Embellishment vs. Deception Theme Icon
Just as Cruso used more delicate terms to discuss this private mutilation, Susan surmises that Mr. Foe will have to use coded language (“figures”) in his book. Susan is disappointed in herself for sharing this detail; initially, she had vowed to keep some things to herself, but now she finds herself making “the darkest of confessions” to Mr. Foe, just like the ones she has read about in his narratives.
Another contradiction in the novel: at times, Susan presents herself as modest and proper, while at other times, she details her sexual exploits with detail and even relish. And indeed, Susan judges the scandalous heroes of Mr. Foe’s tales—but she also seems to have read every single tale with gusto. 
Themes
Embellishment vs. Deception Theme Icon
Gender and Creation Theme Icon
But Mr. Foe is still not satisfied, and still, he presses Susan to reveal more about Bahia; Susan compares him to a spider because of how patiently he waits for her to trap herself. But Susan refuses to do so, standing firm that the story of her lost daughter will not find its way into Mr. Foe’s book, just as she will not invent cannibals and pirates to break up the monotony of the island.
Mr. Foe knows that boredom will lead to invention and confession; is he perhaps intentionally keeping Susan bored and in the dark, then, in the hopes that she will reveal more after weeks of monotony? There is also some irony in Susan’s claim that she will not invent cannibals, as she has made up several stories about Friday’s cannibalism.
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Embellishment vs. Deception Theme Icon
Gender and Creation Theme Icon
Moreover, Susan wants Mr. Foe to understand the difference between her silence and Friday’s silence. Because Friday has no words, Susan posits, he can be shaped into any narrative that is convenient; “I say he is a cannibal and he becomes a cannibal,” Susan decrees, “I say he is a laundryman and he becomes a laundryman.” By contrast, Susan’s silence is purposeful, a way of controlling her own narrative instead of surrendering it.
In this vital exchange, Susan shows the immense power of language and storytelling—because Friday has no speech, she can invent his past and present, telling people stories that nobody is able to challenge. And just as there is power in sharing, there is also power in withholding—because she has a voice, Susan can both spread false stories and protest against true ones. 
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
Embellishment vs. Deception Theme Icon
Gender and Creation Theme Icon
Quotes
Besides, how could Susan describe Bahia to Mr. Foe even if she wanted to? Even just the list of pastries she encountered there is too long and varied to fit in a book, much less the complicated racial dynamics or the world of Brazil beyond Bahia’s borders. Susan reflects that only small, boring places like the island can be “subjugated” into words.
The use of the word “subjugated” is particularly worth noting, as it is Susan’s most literal recognition of the power language has over places (and, by extension, the people within them). Moreover, remote islands are easier to subjugate than cities because there are fewer voices to contradict each other.
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Susan again insists that she is determined to be “father” to her own story. But Foe pushes back, using the example of a woman who, when sent to the gallows, confessed a stream of sins so endless that the chaplain finally made her stop talking. Susan wonders aloud if the moral of the story is that “he has the last word who disposes over the greatest force.”
The word “father” reappears here—Susan distanced herself from the young girl by saying that she was “father-born,” but Susan herself now claims to be a father of sorts. This essential conversation about “force” and language is, essentially, Susan’s realization that history is written by the victors—and that people who use violence (like, for example, white enslavers) can rewrite narratives to help themselves.
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
Gender and Creation Theme Icon
Quotes
Mr. Foe tries to tell another parable, but Susan will not hear it. Instead, she loses her temper: though she once had dreams of being made famous as a castaway, now, she only hopes to feel like she is more special than an everyday servant.
Clearly, Susan’s desire for fame and a literary legacy are so powerful that she would rather go hungry than go without prominence.
Themes
Gender and Creation Theme Icon
Susan recounts the story of the ancient story of the Muse, “who visits poets in the night and begets stories upon them.” At first, Susan wished that there could be a man-Muse to empower her, but now she sees that Mr. Foe is the “mother” of the story, while Susan’s only job is to “beget” it. Foe listens carefully, but instead of responding, he merely offers Susan a fine Italian wafer from his alcove.
Susan now more explicitly plays with inverting gender roles. The word “beget” suggests that she will implant her story in Mr. Foe (acting in a phallic role), while he will carry it to term—acting as the story’s pregnant “mother.” Moreover, Susan wonders if the role of the Muse is also a masculine one, even though the Muse is a traditionally feminine figure; perhaps, then, Susan suggests that narrative is often a site of this kind of gender reversal.
Themes
Gender and Creation Theme Icon
Susan compliments Mr. Foe on his lovely home and ponders whether her memoir was boring because the windowless room she wrote it in was boring. Mr. Foe reminds Susan that her story is boring because there are no adventures or cannibals to break it up. Susan answers that Friday is a cannibal, but that deprived of flesh, even cannibals can become boring.
On the one hand, Susan has fully committed to her false narrative of Friday’s cannibalism. On the other hand, she finds that even this lie is not enough; if a story is based on adventure (as opposed to, say, interior life), it will always run out of steam.
Themes
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
Embellishment vs. Deception Theme Icon
Mr. Foe sends his servant-boy Jack out for dinner, informing Susan that he found Jack when the boy was out on the streets, pick-pocketing people. Susan wonders why Mr. Foe did not take Jack into his home as she has taken Friday into her life—but Mr. Foe replies that perhaps Friday might be happier were he able to find some of “his own kind.” Susan thinks Friday might understand what Mr. Foe is saying, but she cannot be sure.
In this debate over Jack and Friday, Foe begins to poke holes in Susan’s paternalistic logic—is she sure she actually knows what Friday wants? Is her claim of responsibility for Friday as generous as she thinks it is, or is it more nefarious and self-serving?
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
Susan has a delicious meal with Friday and Mr. Foe. After they have finished, there is a knock on the door, and Foe opens it to reveal the young girl and Amy, the maid she claimed to have as a child in Deptford. Susan is angry, and she wants to leave immediately—“I am not a story,” she tells Mr. Foe, and she vows that there are parts of her life and history which she will keep private.
Earlier, Susan bragged to Friday that she can decide, just with the force of her words, whether he is a “laundryman” or a “cannibal.” But when Mr. Foe tries to transform her own life in a similar way, Susan refuses, insisting that her life is too real and meaningful to be “a story”—implicating, therefore, that Friday’s life is not as meaningful.
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
Quotes
Desperate to prove Foe wrong, Susan takes the girl in her arms and kisses her; the girl returns her kiss almost like a “lover.” Yet Susan remains positive that the girl is not her daughter, and she grows ever more certain that Mr. Foe has sent them. Worse still, Susan now begins to doubt her own reality, and Mr. Foe’s, a thought process she describes out loud: “now all my life grows to be story and there is nothing of my own left to me.”
In some ways, Susan’s waning grasp of reality is karmic and of her own making; after all, she has spent so much time embellishing that now she does not know what she can trust. Susan’s determination to preserve her privacy is especially interesting given how much she airs Friday’s most private details.
Themes
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
Embellishment vs. Deception Theme Icon
Instead of answering Susan, Mr. Foe kisses her passionately, and she kisses him back. After they embrace, Susan recalls a ghost story Mr. Foe had written several years before; the story feels like proof, to Susan, that merely talking or kissing someone is not enough to determine they are not a ghost.  
Susan frequently frets about who is a “substantial being.” This discussion of ghosts opens and complicates that question: is a real person defined by their words (narrative) or by their bodies (sex, contact, and kissing)?
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
Gender and Creation Theme Icon
Mr. Foe advises Susan to do as he does: every time he embarks on a new story, he leaves himself a marker of some kind, a certainty he can return to when he gets lost in “the maze of doubting.” With those words, he dismisses Jack, and Amy and the girl (reluctantly) also leave Foe’s house and return home.
Mr. Foe does seem genuinely interested in helping Susan become a better writer, suggesting that he feels less anxiety than Susan does about sharing narrative power. 
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Gender and Creation Theme Icon
Susan motions to leave, but Mr. Foe insists that she and Friday spend the night with him. Foe prepares an alcove for Friday to sleep in, but he invites Susan into his bed. Before they sleep, the two lie awake talking about their dreams and memories. Foe mentions an old Italian book where a man visits Hell and is greeted by ghosts. Foe quotes one of the ghosts from the book: “do not suppose, mortal,” the ghost says, “that because I am not substantial these tears you behold are not the tears of true grief.”
The old Italian book Foe is referencing is Dante’s famous Inferno. But rather than simplifying Susan’s problems with storytelling, Foe uses Dante to add another wrench in the mix—what happens to the characters and “ghosts” who are written off as insubstantial?
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
Susan now recounts the story of her first meeting with Foe, while he begins to touch her and flirt with her. As the two start to have sex, Susan is reminded of Cruso, and she closes her eyes, trying to imagine the island. But Susan cannot conjure that memory, so instead, she straddles Mr. Foe, whispering that this is how the Muse visits poets; “she must do whatever lies in her power to father her offspring,” Susan explains.
The novel has frequently conflated sex and artistic creation, but now Susan sees sex not just as symbolically related to authorship but as an important tool to preserve her story. Fascinatingly, Susan sees herself as the “father” here, suggesting that even if the young girl is “father-born,” she could still be Susan’s daughter.
Themes
Gender and Creation Theme Icon
Quotes
After they have had sex, Foe begins to wonder about Friday throwing petals in the water back on the island. Maybe he was trying to appease a kraken, a giant sea monster. Or maybe he was visiting the ruined ship, which Foe thinks was actually a slave ship—so Friday would have been throwing petals to commemorate his dead loved ones.
In this vital passage, Foe closely examines what Susan has tried so hard to keep hidden: that Friday was being shipped into chattel slavery, and that Cruso, as a white man on the ship, was almost certainly a slave trader. Friday’s oft-discussed “sorrows” are tremendous and multifaceted, and his only companion on the island is the very man responsible for the tragedies that have befallen him.
Themes
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
Foe remarks that it is strange that Friday, despite being on the rough seas, survived his precarious petal throwing. Foe believes that in order to access the true story, they must learn Friday’s perspective: “in every story there is a silence,” Foe comments, and “we must make Friday’s silence speak.” But this upsets Susan, who feels that she has tried every way possible of getting Friday to speak—and has failed in all of them.
This belief that there is a whole story in the “silences” of traditional narratives emphasizes Coetzee’s central artistic project and reflects a postmodern, postcolonial approach. Since erasure was such a big part of colonialism and enslavement, finding what has been obscured is a necessary part of trying to address those harms through art and literature.
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
Quotes
Foe suggests that Friday should try writing; after all, he has fingers. Foe also wonders if God did not speak the world into existence but rather wrote it into existence (and could be still writing it). Susan feels that Friday will not be able to understand the meanings of words, much less write them down, but she gives up trying to argue with Cruso.
Religion and faith play a giant role in Robinson Crusoe but have been almost entirely absent from Susan’s own narrative. Perhaps this is because Susan wants to act as her own god, writing her island world into existence just as Foe speculates the biblical god might have done with the entire universe.
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
That night, Susan struggles to asleep. In the middle of the night, she gets up and goes to the alcove, looking in at Friday. She cannot tell if Friday is asleep or awake, and when she crawls back into bed, she is disturbed by his presence. Fortunately, she is able to fall asleep soon.
In her newfound discomfort, Susan seems to be suddenly aware of Friday’s own consciousness, as distinct from (and potentially challenging to) her own.
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
The next morning, Susan and Friday are about to leave Mr. Foe’s house. But before they can, Foe gives Susan a chalkboard and instructs her to teach Friday how to write. Using some money Mr. Foe gives her for breakfast, Susan and Friday eat, and then Susan begins to teach Friday the word house. She draws a picture, then writes the word beneath it, and encourages Friday to write the same word; he does, though his letters are misshapen.
Susan and Friday have been staying in Mr. Foe’s various houses, so Susan has had access to slate and chalk for months. The fact that she has never before tried to teach Friday how to write, and that she does so now only for Mr. Foe’s money, reveals again just how little she has actually invested in communicating with Friday.
Themes
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
Next, Susan teaches Friday the words “mother,”  “ship,” and “Africa,” using the same method; for  “Africa,” Susan draws a picture of palm trees and a lion. Friday shows no real signs of understanding, and Susan wonders if, privately, he is mocking her. Nevertheless, she returns to Mr. Foe, ready to demonstrate what Friday has learned.
Just as with her drawings about the loss of Friday’s tongue, Susan’s depiction of Africa is so riddled with stereotypes and assumptions that it ceases to be useful.
Themes
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
When they get to Foe’s house, Friday takes the slate—but instead of writing on it, he draws a picture of human feet, each one covered by an eye. Susan tries to show the slate to Mr. Foe, but Friday spits on his fingers and erases his drawing. Susan despairs, comparing her situation with Friday to the tale of Sinbad of Persia. In that story, Sinbad offers help to an old man, only to find that the old man will cling to him forever and never let him go.
There are several things worth noting in this strange excerpt. First, Friday’s drawing perhaps shows how much those who are dismissed as servants (“hands”) are actually constantly watching and interpreting (eyes). But also, Susan is once again rewriting history to position herself as the victim and slave instead as the victimizer. 
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
Foe pushes back on this—Friday’s silence makes him easier for Foe and Susan to use as they wish, as they can imagine Friday’s desires to be whatever is convenient for them. Susan insists that she knows what Friday is thinking, which is that he wants to be “liberated.” But while Susan goes on a tangent about the true meaning of the word freedom, Foe believes the solution is more straightforward; the first step to liberating Friday will be to teach him to write some basic words, rather than debating the meaning of more nebulous language. 
Perhaps because Foe himself is a writer of dubious tales, he is hyper-attuned to how deceptive and tricky language can be. And indeed, Susan’s prose-like, circular logic has thus far distracted her readers from the brutal truths at the heart of her tale. In other words, just as language can invert roles (turning Susan into a victim and Foe into a mother), it can also delay necessary action.
Themes
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
Embellishment vs. Deception Theme Icon
Gender and Creation Theme Icon
Susan still feels that teaching Friday to write is pointless, as he will just continue to follow her around. In response, Mr. Foe compares Susan to a slaveowner: “Friday follows you,” he points out, “you do not follow Friday.” Susan resents this suggestion, but on a walk by herself a few hours later, Susan cannot help but wonder if she is holding Friday “captive” to her desire for a good story.
Here and elsewhere, Foe acts as a corrective to Susan’s attempt at victimizing herself. But while Susan at last uses the language of slavery for herself, acknowledging that she is holding Friday in a kind of bondage, Foe is not a hero, either; the real Robinson Crusoe novel indulges in the mythos around Friday’s cannibalism and writes slavery out of the narrative entirely. (Indeed, Friday is depicted as indigenous in Defoe’s real novel). 
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Enslavement, Silence, and Erasure Theme Icon
Embellishment vs. Deception Theme Icon
Quotes
And if Friday is a captive, could Foe also be a captive to the various people he writes about? Susan now begins to realize that, despite the scandalous stories in Foe’s books, he is really writing the same story “over and over, in version after version, stillborn every time: the story of the island,” which is “lifeless” no matter who writes it. 
Susan now begins to realize that readers’ expectations and stereotypes dictate every story; what matters for money and success is not the truth, but simply what will please audiences. The use of the word “stillborn” again blurs the line between storytelling and conception.
Themes
Embellishment vs. Deception Theme Icon
Gender and Creation Theme Icon
When Susan returns to Mr. Foe’s house, the man sitting at the desk is not Foe—it is Friday, dressed in Foe’s robes and wig and writing on Foe’s papers. Susan is horrified by this, but she manages to sit down by Foe and Friday and watch as Friday tries to write.
It is worth taking extra note of the shift in genre now—as the novel comes to a close, Coetzee becomes more surreal in his writing, calling his readers’ reality into question just as Susan begins to doubt her own circumstances. 
Themes
Embellishment vs. Deception Theme Icon
In the daylight, Foe is very unattractive to Susan; noticing her distaste, Foe compares himself to “an old whore” who should only be seen in the dark. Susan instead compares Foe to a wife, because he is giving her a home and carrying her story—her child—to term. The mention of childbirth brings Foe back to Bahia, and Susan’s daughter there. And just as they are about to reignite the debate about the young girl who claims to be Susan’s child, Foe notices that Friday is writing the letter “o” over and over again. “Tomorrow,” Foe instructs Susan, “you must teach him ‘a.’”
Maybe the most unreliable thing about Susan as a narrator is her daughter: is Mr. Foe inventing this daughter, or is Susan just using words like “father-born” to distance herself from a child who is, in fact, hers? But rather than illuminating this tangential mystery, Foe is now clear about what is at the heart of the story—Friday’s thoughts, Friday’s perspective.
Themes
Storytelling and Power Theme Icon
Embellishment vs. Deception Theme Icon
Gender and Creation Theme Icon
Quotes