For Cause and Comrades

by

James McPherson

Teachers and parents! Our Teacher Edition on For Cause and Comrades makes teaching easy.

For Cause and Comrades: Chapter 9 Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
While anti-slavery sentiments weren’t unheard of at the beginning of the war, very few Union soldiers would have said that they were fighting for racial equality, or even primarily for abolition of slavery. However, abolishing slavery for the sake of the union was a cause that took hold within the war’s first year and a half. For instance, an Ohio corporal saw “slavery and the slave power” as the cause of the “dangerous disease” of secession.
While McPherson holds that slavery was definitely the major cause of the Civil War, that doesn’t mean that most Northern soldiers thought this way initially—and even those who did tended to see slavery as more of a symptom than a cause. Few were openly committed to the abolition of slavery.
Themes
Northern vs. Southern Ideology Theme Icon
Slavery, Equality, and Abolition Theme Icon
Soldiers who already held antislavery views often had these intensified upon visiting the South during the war. After talking with a slave woman, a Pennsylvania private wrote, “I am more than ever convinced of the cruelty and inhumanity of the system.” However, when soldiers spoke of slavery as a “blight,” they weren’t necessarily speaking from humanitarian concerns. Plenty saw “free-labor ideology” as something which promoted societal backwardness in general, stifling enterprise, ingenuity, prosperity, and even literacy throughout the rural South.
Even when some were moved to compassion by their experiences in the South, many soldiers also saw slavery as part of a bigger economic and cultural picture. Contrary to popular narratives that portray Northerners as staunchly anti-slavery, many believed that “free-labor ideology” would have disastrous consequences for social and economic progress.
Themes
Northern vs. Southern Ideology Theme Icon
Slavery, Equality, and Abolition Theme Icon
Runaway slaves often found shelter among the Union lines. Often, soldiers’ attitudes about this “were more pragmatic than altruistic,” as they saw fugitive labor as useful for freeing up more Union soldiers for the front lines. By the middle of 1862, though, “pragmatism and principle” began to form “a growing commitment to emancipation as both a means and goal of Union victory.”
Part of the change in soldiers’ views about emancipation had to do with their view of Southern secessionists as “traitors” who’d forfeited their “property,” including slaves. This initially motivated some to shelter slaves more than simple compassion did.
Themes
Northern vs. Southern Ideology Theme Icon
Slavery, Equality, and Abolition Theme Icon
In July, 1862, Congress passed a confiscation act, and Lincoln decided that he would pass his Emancipation Proclamation. At this time, plenty of Union soldiers opposed freeing the slaves. Racism was a factor, and the rumors of emancipation led to arguments and rumblings of dissatisfaction among soldiers, who complained, as one soldier did, that if Lincoln turned this into “an abolition war […] I for one shall be sorry that I ever lent a hand to it.” While some were grateful that the proclamation made the war a clear conflict “between slavery and freedom,” others felt betrayed and expressed hostility and disgust toward African Americans and abolitionists.
The confiscation act stated that any Confederate within occupied areas who didn’t surrender could have his slaves freed. This was a sort of testing of the waters for the Emancipation Proclamation, which immediately proved controversial. Some felt the Proclamation signaled a change in the aims of the war, which further underlines the point that not all Union soldiers enlisted out of abolitionist sentiments.
Themes
Northern vs. Southern Ideology Theme Icon
Slavery, Equality, and Abolition Theme Icon
Get the entire For Cause and Comrades LitChart as a printable PDF.
For Cause and Comrades PDF
In fact, the Emancipation Proclamation caused a “morale crisis” in the Union armies in the winter of 1862–1863. However, much of this could be attributed to defeatism in light of recent Union leadership failures. Ultimately, around half of the Union armies did seem to favor the Proclamation. And anti-emancipation soldiers began to change their minds over the course of 1863, both because of Copperheadism and the growing conviction that emancipation really would weaken the enemy and strengthen the Union.
General McClellan had been removed from his command recently, and defeat at Fredericksburg and the Mud March (a failed offensive) all contributed to lowered morale. Copperheadism was the term applied to the “Peace Democrats” who denounced Lincoln’s war as unconstitutional and wanted immediate peace with the Confederacy.
Themes
Slavery, Equality, and Abolition Theme Icon
Morale and Endurance Theme Icon
Quotes
Another factor was that the Union began to recruit black regiments. At first, this met with much opposition, often on racist grounds. But here, too—even among soldiers who otherwise didn’t favor abolition—a pragmatic shift began. After all, many reasoned that black soldiers could shoot rebels just as well. And the more black soldiers entered the action, the more their success changed minds. An Illinois private wrote admiringly of black soldiers’ efforts at the battle of Nashville and reasoned that anyone fighting on behalf of the country should be free.
Some of the battles in which black regiments especially distinguished themselves included Port Hudson, Milliken’s Bend, and Fort Wagner, all in 1863. Regiments were racially segregated, but soldiers crossed paths often enough that some had their minds changed about the equality of black and white people.
Themes
Slavery, Equality, and Abolition Theme Icon
Quotes
Evidence of black soldiers’ thoughts is difficult to come by. Some letters were published in Northern black newspapers, but few personal letters or diaries have survived and even fewer of these documents were written by freed slaves. Many freed slaves couldn’t read or write. However, black soldiers certainly fought for their own and others’ freedom, and increasingly for the cause of equality in general.
McPherson explains why the perspectives of black soldiers themselves aren’t represented among his samples: due to the historical circumstances, especially the oppressive effects of slavery, there simply isn’t enough documentary evidence upon which to generalize.
Themes
Slavery, Equality, and Abolition Theme Icon
By 1864, resistance to black regiments was a minority position. When Lincoln ran for reelection on an abolitionism platform, he received 80 percent of the solider vote. By this time, too, fervor for emancipation was much increased. An Illinois lieutenant wrote that he was surprised at how abolition had gained traction over the course of the war—now, he reasoned, he was fighting for the noble cause of liberty for all.
McPherson concludes that white Union sentiments regarding black soldiers really did change significantly over the course of the war, due in large part to personal experience of meeting black soldiers and admiring their work firsthand.
Themes
Slavery, Equality, and Abolition Theme Icon