Metaphors

Gone with the Wind

by Margaret Mitchell

Gone with the Wind: Metaphors 5 key examples

Definition of Metaphor

A metaphor is a figure of speech that compares two different things by saying that one thing is the other. The comparison in a metaphor can be stated explicitly, as... read full definition
A metaphor is a figure of speech that compares two different things by saying that one thing is the other. The comparison in a metaphor... read full definition
A metaphor is a figure of speech that compares two different things by saying that one thing is the other... read full definition
Chapter 3
Explanation and Analysis—Heartbeat of the South:

Mitchell uses a series of metaphors drawn from heartbeats in her description of the important role that cotton played in the economy of the Antebellum South: 

All of the world was crying out for cotton, and the new land of the County, unworn and fertile, produced it abundantly. Cotton was the heartbeat of the section, the planting and the picking were the diastole and systole of the red earth. Wealth came out of the curving furrows, and arrogance came too—arrogance built on green bushes and the acres of fleecy white. If cotton could make them rich in one generation, how much richer they would be in the next!

In the novel, North Georgia has only recently been settled by White settlers, and both rich planter families such as the O'Haras and poorer farming families such as the Slatterys grow cotton to accommodate the huge national demand for the crop. Cotton, Mitchell writes, "was the heartbeat of the section," a metaphor that underscores how important cotton was to the Southern states. Further developing this metaphor, she writes that the "planting and picking" of cotton were the "diastole" (the relaxed stage of the cardiac cycle, when the chambers of the heart fill with blood) and the "systole" (the contrasting stage, when the heart chambers contract). Here, Mitchell's metaphors suggest that the planting and picking seasons are a natural rhythm in the South, which depends upon this economically important crop. 

Chapter 8
Explanation and Analysis—Triumvirate :

When Scarlett arrives in Atlanta following the death of her husband Charles, Mitchell employs both allusion and metaphor in her portrayal of Mrs. Merriwether, Mrs. Elsing, and Mrs. Whiting, three prominent and influential women in Atlanta society: 

These two ladies with a third, Mrs. Whiting, were the pillars of Atlanta. They ran the three churches to which they belonged, the clergy, the choirs and the parishioners [...] They knew what was decorous behavior and what was not and they never failed to make their opinions known—Mrs. Merriwether at the top of her voice, Mrs. Elsing in an elegant die-away drawl and Mrs. Whiting in a distressed whisper which showed how much she hated to speak of such things. These three ladies disliked and distrusted one another as heartily as the First Triumvirate of Rome, and their close alliance was probably for the same reason.

Despite the various restrictions placed upon women's public activities at this time, these three women "were the pillars of Atlanta," a metaphor that highlights just how important a role they play in determining social mores in the city's upper classes. Though they present themselves as a united front who agree on what does and does not constitute polite or "decorous behavior," Mitchell notes that they "disliked and distrusted one another as heartily as the First Triumvirate of Rome." Here, she alludes to a political alliance in the late Roman Republic between three prominent statesmen: Julius Caesar, Crassus, and Pompey. After the death of Crassus in 53 B.C.E., the alliance between Caesar and Pompey deteriorated into civil war. This allusion, then, suggests that these three prominent Atlanta women are united only for strategic and political reasons and feel no genuine warmth for each other. 

Unlock with LitCharts A+
Chapter 13
Explanation and Analysis—Dr. Meade's Letter :

After Rhett Butler outrages Atlanta society by speaking of the Confederate cause in the Civil War in a pessimistic and dismissive manner, Dr. Meade writes to a local newspaper to express his absolute disapproval of Rhett in veiled terms. In his letter, he uses a series of metaphors that condemn Rhett as dishonorable and opportunistic: 

But there are others, scoundrels, who masquerade under the cloak of the blockader for their own selfish gains, and I call down the just wrath and vengeance of an embattled people, fighting in the justest of Causes, on these human vultures who bring in satins and laces when our men are dying for want of quinine [...] I execrate these vampires who are sucking the lifeblood of the men who follow Robert Lee—these men who are making the very name of blockader a stench in the nostrils of all patriotic men. How can we endure these scavengers in our midst [...]

The doctor's letter invokes pathos, drawing on the emotions of his readers in order to convince them to banish Rhett from their society or even imprison him. His language is notably emotional as he calls on his peers to join him in condemning, "with the just wrath and vengeance of an embattled people," such "human vultures" as Rhett. Here, Dr. Meade's metaphor, which compares Rhett to a vulture, suggests that Rhett is profiting off of the misery and destruction caused by the war. Further, he refers to Rhett and others like him as "vampires who are sucking the lifeblood of the men who follow Robert Lee" and additionally characterizes them as "scavengers in our midst."

These various metaphors all suggest that Rhett, who has been running ships past the Northern naval blockade, is not motivated by any real desire to help the Confederate States, but rather by mere opportunism. Indeed, Rhett will gain immense wealth throughout the course of the war, though ironically, he becomes increasingly passionate about the Confederate cause just as its failure becomes undeniable. 

Unlock with LitCharts A+
Chapter 31
Explanation and Analysis—A Shadow:

Explaining his inability to adjust to the post-war world to a confused Scarlett, Ashley uses a metaphor that compares his old life to a shadow: 

Scarlett, before the war, life was beautiful [...] Maybe it wasn’t so to everyone. I know that now. But to me, living at Twelve Oaks, there was a real beauty to living. I belonged in that life. I was a part of it. And now it is gone and I am out of place in this new life, and I am afraid. Now, I know that in the old days it was a shadow show I watched. I avoided everything which was not shadowy, people and situations which were too real, too vital.

Ashley's response to the South's defeat in the Civil War is complex and ambivalent. He recognizes that the South was foolish to think it could win a war against the industrialized North, but he does not regret his own involvement. Further, he longs for the comforts he experienced in the Antebellum South while also recognizing that others did not share his experiences of the old social order that, he feels, has been destroyed. He tells Scarlett that "life was beautiful" before the war but also concedes that "maybe it wasn't so for everyone," subtly acknowledging the various classes of people, including enslaved people, who suffered under the social order to which he longs to return.

Using a metaphor, Ashley concludes that his old life was "a shadow show," both because of his investments in literature and history but also because the world of the Antebellum South was itself, in some way, a mere shadow, or a mode of social organization that could not possibly be sustained in perpetuity. After the war, the differences between the worldviews of the pragmatic Scarlett and the dreamy and idealistic Ashley become even more pronounced. 

Unlock with LitCharts A+
Chapter 55
Explanation and Analysis—Unbroken Phalanx:

After India publicly accuses Scarlett and Ashley of infidelity, Melanie comes to Scarlett’s defense, dividing the Wilkes family along loyalties to India and Melanie. Here, Mitchell uses a metaphor that compares the Wilkes family, prior to this bitter fight, to a phalanx, an Ancient Greek military formation:

Half of Atlanta was kin to or claimed kin with Melanie and India. The ramifications of cousins, double cousins, cousins-in-law and kissing cousins were so intricate and involved that no one but a born Georgian could ever unravel them. They had always been a clannish tribe, presenting an unbroken phalanx of overlapping shields to the world in times of stress, no matter what their private opinions of the conduct of individual kinsmen might be [...] They were gentle, quiet spoken, reserved people and not given to even the amiable bickering that characterized most Atlanta families.

The Wilkes family, Mitchell writes, were always a closely-knit and “clannish tribe," presenting themselves in public as “an unbroken phalanx of overlapping shields.” In this metaphor, the novel compares the loyalty of the Wilkes family to a phalanx. In Ancient Greece, a phalanx was a military formation composed of overlapping shields and weapons that presented a nearly impregnable defense to other armies. With some guilt, Scarlett realizes that she has undermined the close bonds of the family, which she knows must be particularly painful for Ashley. 

Unlock with LitCharts A+