Hayavadana
by Girish Karnad

Identity, Hybridity, and Incompleteness Theme Analysis

Themes and Colors
Identity, Hybridity, and Incompleteness Theme Icon
The Mind vs. The Body Theme Icon
Metatheatre and Storytelling Theme Icon
Indian Culture and Nationalism Theme Icon
LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Hayavadana, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
Identity, Hybridity, and Incompleteness Theme Icon
Identity, Hybridity, and Incompleteness Theme Icon

One of the common threads throughout Hayavadana is the recurrence of beings that are hybrids, with minds and bodies that are not ordinarily compatible. The play contains three “layers”: first, a ritual prayer; second, the plot concerning Hayavadana; and third, the actual “story” being presented about two men whose heads are accidentally swapped. Karnad uses these beings to demonstrate that incompleteness is an integral aspect of the human condition, and that although it is human nature to strive toward completeness, it is inevitably unattainable.

At the very outset of the play, hybridity is presented as an ideal. The play begins with a puja (i.e., a prayer ritual) for the mask of Ganesha, one of the main deities in Hinduism. Ganesha is a god with the body of a boy and the head of an elephant. The Bhagavata points out that Ganesha’s appearance makes him seem imperfect, and yet he is thought of as “the Lord and Master of Success and Perfection.” This leads the Bhagavata to suggest that Ganesha really signifies that “the completeness of God is something no poor mortal can comprehend.” Thus, although Ganesha appears to be made of fragments of different beings, he is nevertheless associated with completion. At the end of the play, the Bhagavata once again thanks Ganesha for ensuring the completion and success of their play. However, by the play’s end, none of the human characters have achieved the same sense of completeness.

In the second framing device of the play, which contains the plot of Hayavadana himself, Hayavadana longs for completeness. Hayavadana is a creature with a man’s body and a horse’s head, the offspring of a deity in horse form and a woman. He explains that all his life he has been trying to remove his horse’s head so that he can become a complete man. He goes to Kali’s temple to try to change his head into a man’s head, but she interrupts him in the middle of his request and instead turns him into a complete horse. When he finds that his voice remains, he is disappointed that he is still a hybrid creature. At the very end of the play, Hayavadana is magically able to achieve completeness with the help of the young boy. As they sing and laugh together, he loses his human voice in exchange for a horse neigh. Even though he is able to find unity, it is not in human form but rather as an animal being, reinforcing the idea that humans are incapable of true completeness.

The play’s primary story line concerns two friends: Devadatta, a poet, and Kapila, a wrestler, as they vie for Padmini’s affection. Although Padmini marries Devadatta at the beginning of the story, she also has feelings for Kapila. In despair over seeing Padmini gaze longingly at Kapila, Devadatta decides to cut off his own head. Kapila discovers Devadatta’s body and also cuts off his head, mourning the loss of his best friend. Padmini calls on the goddess Kali to revive them, but she accidentally swaps their heads, so that each has the body of one man and the head of another. The incompleteness of the two men becomes the main conflict between all three characters. Their inability to find a sense of wholeness drives them to kill each other/themselves at the end of the play. After their heads are swapped, the men’s bodies begin to change as they assimilate with their new heads. The body of Kapila becomes soft and weak now that it is attached to Devadatta’s head, while the body of Devadatta becomes more muscular with Kapila’s head. However, Devadatta no longer writes poetry now that he is attached to Kapila’s body, and Kapila mentions that his new body has memories of feelings that he does not know how to name because he did not experience them. The situation leaves a hollowness in both of their lives. Ultimately, neither is satisfied with this new half-existence, so they resolve kill each other.

Padmini exemplifies her own kind of incompleteness. She marries Devadatta for his mind, but even in their marriage she acknowledges her physical attraction to Kapila. When the two men switch heads, she initially seems to have gotten the best of both worlds, but as the men’s bodies change, she recognizes that none of them can go on living, as her own desire is split in between the minds and bodies of the men. After the two men kill each other, abandoning her, she realizes her own incompleteness and performs sati (a practice in which a widow throws herself onto her husband’s funeral pyre).

Although all of the characters attempt to find unity within themselves, all the human characters are ultimately unable to do so. As each loses a part of his or her identity—whether it is a head, a body, or a lover—they work to return to a sort of equilibrium, but the fates of Karnad’s various human characters suggest that humans always suffer from a sense of incompletion. The only character that achieves unity is Hayavadana, but he becomes complete only as a horse, not as a man. Karnad thus suggests that completeness is left to beings that are divine, while humans work at—and ultimately fail to achieve—a true sense of completion in their identities.

Related Themes from Other Texts
Compare and contrast themes from other texts to this theme…

Identity, Hybridity, and Incompleteness ThemeTracker

The ThemeTracker below shows where, and to what degree, the theme of Identity, Hybridity, and Incompleteness appears in each act of Hayavadana. Click or tap on any chapter to read its Summary & Analysis.
How often theme appears:
act length:
Get the entire Hayavadana LitChart as a printable PDF.
"My students can't get enough of your charts and their results have gone through the roof." -Graham S.
Hayavadana PDF

Identity, Hybridity, and Incompleteness Quotes in Hayavadana

Below you will find the important quotes in Hayavadana related to the theme of Identity, Hybridity, and Incompleteness.

Act 1 Quotes

O single-tusked destroyer of incompleteness, we pay homage to you and start our play.

Related Characters: The Bhagavata (speaker)
Related Symbols: Masks
Page Number and Citation: 1
Explanation and Analysis:
At the very beginning of the play, the Bhagavata prays to Ganesha (the “single-tusked destroyer of incompleteness,” who has the body of a boy and the head of an elephant) to ensure the success of the play. In this way, the play sets up its unique structure, beginning with a scene that falls somewhere between theater and religious ritual, and calls attention to the fact that the audience is watching a play. It also establishes the pattern of using masks to represent hybrid creatures, as the Bhagavata prays to the mask of an elephant onstage. Finally, the opening scene situates Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at

Could it be that this Image of purity and Holiness, this Mangala-moorty, intends to signify by his very appearance that the completeness of God is something no poor mortal can comprehend?

Related Characters: The Bhagavata (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 1
Explanation and Analysis:
In this quote, the Bhagavata introduces one of the larger themes of the play: the theme of incompleteness and human striving for a sense of self. As he is offering his prayers to the holy Ganesha, the Bhagavata sets up a distinction between the completeness of a god and the incompleteness of humans—a distinction with which many of the characters within the play will struggle. Although Ganesha is a hybrid creature, the Bhagavata argues that his completeness is simply beyond what any mortal may understand. The hybrid nature of characters like Hayavadana, Devadatta, and Kapila, by contrast, leads to their Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. A

BHAGAVATA: Hayavadana, what's written on our foreheads cannot be altered.

HAYAVADANA: [slapping himself on the forehead] But what a forehead! What a forehead! If it was a forehead like yours, I would have accepted anything. But this! I have tried to accept my fate. My personal life has naturally been blameless. So I took interest in the social life of the Nation—Civics, Politics, Patriotism, Nationalism, Indianization, the Socialist Pattern of Society. . . I have tried everything! But where's my society? Where? You must help me to become a complete man, Bhagavata Sir. But how? What can I do?

Related Characters: The Bhagavata (speaker), Hayavadana (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 9
Explanation and Analysis:
As Hayavadana explains the methods he has used to try to rid himself of his horse head, the Bhagavata comments that it is difficult to alter “what’s written on [one’s] forehead.” Figuratively, he seems to mean that one cannot escape one’s fate, but in a more literal sense in this play, the head is a force that is hard to reckon with. Many of the characters, including Devadatta and Padmini, echo these sentiments later when they argue that the head rules the body. In the case of Kapila and Devadatta, their heads even transform their bodies, such as when Devadatta Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provid

Why should love stick to the sap of a single body? When the stem is drunk with the thick yearning of the many-petalled, many-flowered lantana, why should it be tied down to the relation of a single flower?

Related Characters: Female chorus (speaker), Padmini
Page Number and Citation: 11
Explanation and Analysis:
As the Bhagavata sets up the main conflict of the play, the female chorus expresses Padmini’s feelings and desires. They question through nature-related metaphor why someone should be limited to loving only one other person. Padmini’s main conflict will be her inability to find completeness in loving only one man. This style of poetic metaphor expressed through song, and the use of natural imagery as euphemisms for physical romance and intimacy, are both traditions borrowed from Sanskrit theater. This is unlikely to be accidental, as the play itself began as a Sanskrit drama that was then adapted into a play Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea

What a good mix!

No more tricks!

Is this one that

or that one this?

Related Characters: Devadatta (speaker), Padmini (speaker), Kapila (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 35
Explanation and Analysis:
After Padmini has switched Devadatta and Kapila’s heads, all three of them become amused at their unlikely situation. They sing this rhyme over and over again, holding hands and spinning in circles as they go. Though their relationships will quickly turn sour, here they share a brief moment of unbridled joy and laughter. This moment comes just before the end of the first act, and in a way it mirrors the laughter that Padmini’s son will find in Hayavadana at the very end of the play. The difference between the two moments, however, is that Devadatta and Kapila are locked Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligen

KAPILA. [Raising his right hand.] This is the hand that accepted her at the wedding. This is the body she’s lived with all these months. And the child she’s carrying is the seed of this body.

Related Characters: Kapila (speaker), Devadatta, Padmini
Page Number and Citation: 36-37
Explanation and Analysis:
When Padmini starts to refer to the person with Devadatta’s head as Devadatta, the man with Kapila’s head starts to argue that he is in fact Devadatta because he has Devadatta’s body. This argument establishes the newfound conflict between the three of them, after the men’s heads have been switched. Between the two of them, Kapila’s hybridity is seemingly more upsetting because he has lost the thing that defined him: his body. He tries to argue that he is Devadatta in order to latch onto the only other thing that really gave him an identity: his love for Padmini. This Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia a

Of all the human limbs the topmost—in position as well as in importance—is the head. I have Devadatta’s head, and it follows that I am Devadatta.

Related Characters: Devadatta (speaker), Padmini, Kapila
Page Number and Citation: 37
Explanation and Analysis:
When Kapila begins to argue that he is Devadatta because he has Devadatta’s body, Devadatta naturally starts to make the opposite argument. Unlike with Kapila’s argument, however, Devadatta’s argument has a lot of prior textual merit. The Bhagavata says something similar when he tells Hayavadana that one cannot alter what is written on one’s forehead, and even Kapila acknowledges this later in the play after their bodies slowly begin to change to reflect the personalities of the heads now attached to them. But even in light of this argument, the body also has its effect on personality, as much of Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicab

Act 2 Quotes

Kapila? What could he be doing now? Where could he be? Could his body be fair still, and his face dark? [Long pause.] Devadatta changes. Kapila changes. And me?

Related Characters: Padmini (speaker), Devadatta, Kapila
Page Number and Citation: 43
Explanation and Analysis:
As the second act goes on and Devadatta’s body begins to return to its original state, Padmini begins to dream of Kapila. One day after a long overdue workout, Devadatta becomes angry that he is losing his muscles. Padmini says he shouldn’t care and that Kapila is out of her life, but no sooner has she said this than she begins to wonder where Kapila is. As Devadatta reverts to his original self, Padmini becomes unhappy and wonders whether she has changed at all from the time she felt so split in her love for the two men. With this Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Opti

DOLL II: Especially last night—I mean—that dream…

DOLL I: Tut-tut—One shouldn't talk about such things!

DOLL II: It was so shameless…

DOLL I: I said be quiet…

DOLL II: Honestly! The way they…

DOLL I: Look, if we must talk about it, let me.

DOLL II: You didn't want to talk about it. So…

Related Characters: Dolls (speaker), Padmini, Kapila
Page Number and Citation: 51
Explanation and Analysis:
As Devadatta’s body returns to its original form, Padmini continues to dream of Kapila. Here the dolls imply that her dreams have become more and more sexually explicit as they fight over who gets to tell the audience about her “shameless” dream. The dolls here reinforce their connection to Padmini’s desire by narrating some of her dreams, but in previous dialogues they also revealed some of her insecurities about her own body and her relationship to these two men. Here and elsewhere, the dolls also express some of her worries about how her relationships are perceived by society, just as Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit.

KAPILA: The moment it came to me, a war started between us.

PADMINI: And who won?

KAPILA: I did.

PADMINI: The head always wins, doesn’t it?

Related Characters: Kapila (speaker), Padmini (speaker), Devadatta
Page Number and Citation: 55
Explanation and Analysis:
When Padmini goes to find Kapila in the forest, she discovers that he, like Kapila, has largely reverted to his original self. He describes how his body rebelled when he tried to work back into shape, but that ultimately, he won the battle between his head and Devadatta’s body. With this development, Kapila seems to realize that the head does in fact rule the body and that he is, undeniably, Kapila—something that he had argued against when their heads were switched initially. But as Devadatta had illustrated earlier, and as Kapila explains shortly after this quote occurs, the body that Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam vo

Isn’t that surprising? That the body should have its own ghosts—its own memories?

Related Characters: Kapila (speaker), Padmini, Devadatta
Page Number and Citation: 57
Explanation and Analysis:
After describing how he conquered Devadatta’s body and, in doing so, returned himself to his original form, Kapila admits to Padmini that his body still has experiences and senses of which he has no conscious knowledge—sensations leftover from Devadatta’s body. Devadatta feels this earlier as well when he impulsively challenges the wrestler, but Kapila’s situation is more difficult as he describes how his body remembers the intimacy that Devadatta and Padmini had shared without having the memories to match. It is this incongruity which haunts him most of all as he tries to sort through his own identity, and which Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt

I know it in my blood you couldn’t have lived together. Because you knew death you died in each other’s arms. You could only have lived ripping each other to pieces. I had to drive you to death. You forgave each other, but again—left me out.

Related Characters: Padmini (speaker), Kapila, Devadatta
Page Number and Citation: 62
Explanation and Analysis:
After Kapila and Devadatta have killed each other at the end of the play, Padmini wonders whether they would still be alive if she had said that all three of them could live together. It is unclear whether Padmini would have found fulfilment in such an arrangement, but she makes it clear that she doesn’t think it would have worked for Devadatta and Kapila. She acknowledges that the conflict between the two men’s warring heads and bodies, there was no room for her, and she echoes earlier sentiments that she feels alone and unchanged by the events that have transpired. Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at

That’s why I sing all these patriotic songs—and the National Anthem! That particularly! I have noticed that the people singing the National Anthem always seem to have ruined their voices—So I try.

Related Characters: Hayavadana (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 69
Explanation and Analysis:
When Hayavadana returns after visiting Kali’s temple, he has traded his human body for a horse body, but laments that he still has a human voice. He explains to the Bhagavata that he sings the National Anthem because he thinks that that will ruin his voice. Once again, Karnad reintroduces his commentary that Indian nationalism is not an adequate means of establishing a collective identity. This statement, when read alongside Hayavadana’s earlier statement that he was unable to find a society to make him feel unified (as well as the fact that Karnad uses a wide variety of regional Indian Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam vo

What’s there in a song, Hayavadana? The real beauty lies in the child’s laughter—in the innocent joy of that laughter. No tragedy can touch it.

Related Characters: The Bhagavata (speaker), Hayavadana, Boy
Page Number and Citation: 70
Explanation and Analysis:
When Hayavadana returns as a talking horse, Padmini’s child, who is also onstage at the time and has been thought not to be able to smile or speak, begins to laugh at Hayavadana, and the two sing together. Eventually the child’s laughter causes Hayavadana to lose his human voice as his own laughter transforms into a horse’s neigh. Through this crossing of storylines, the two are able to find their own sense of completeness. The laughter found through this theatrical storytelling, both by the characters within it and also for the audience, is shown to be a powerful means of Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non