Leviathan

Leviathan

by

Thomas Hobbes

Teachers and parents! Our Teacher Edition on Leviathan makes teaching easy.

Leviathan: Chapter 29 Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
The dissolution of a common-wealth is usually due to the “Imperfect Institution” from which it comes, and these “infirmities” or “diseases” resemble those of the human body. One such infirmary is when a sovereign power is content with less power than what they actually possess to defend and protect a common-wealth. Power can be denied by ignorance, or it can be denied intentionally for some benefit to the sovereign power. Disease in the common-wealth is also caused by the belief that individual subjects can determine good actions from bad actions. As a common-wealth is not a state of nature, only the sovereign power and civil laws can determine good actions from bad. Similarly, assuming that what is against one’s conscience must be a sin is also damaging to the common-wealth. It is up to the common-wealth, not a subject’s conscience, to determine what actions are sinful.
Again, Hobbes draws a parallel between a living body and a common-wealth, which suggests that a common-wealth vulnerable to all the things a body is. A common-wealth is an “Imperfect Institution” because it is made up of people, who are imperfect by nature. According to Hobbes, humans are by nature self-centered and violent, which are two of the “diseases” that can bring down a common-wealth. For instance, if a sovereign power acts only in their own best interest (as people are wont to do) and ignores its subjects’ needs, a common-wealth cannot stand.
Themes
Nature, War, and Civil Society   Theme Icon
Power, Common-wealths, and Monarchies Theme Icon
Religion Theme Icon
Quotes
The belief that faith is obtained by “supernaturall Inspiration” and not “Study and Reason” is also damaging to a common-wealth, and so is holding a sovereign power subject to civil laws. A sovereign power is not a subject of the common-wealth; thus, a sovereign power cannot be held to the same laws as a subject. Furthermore, if every subject is given absolute right to their own goods and property that exclude the rights of the sovereign, it is also detrimental to a common-wealth’s health. Exclusion of the sovereign confuses the sovereign’s position of power over subjects and begins to slowly dissolve the balance of power. 
With Hobbes’s reference to “supernaturall Inspiration,” he implies that religion can be damaging to a common-wealth if one’s faith is not a product of “Study and Reason.” Hobbes argues one should not blindly submit to the faith of another, but should instead acquire faith independently through the study of scripture and one’s own ability to reason. According to Hobbes, one who blindly follows the faith of another will believe anything, which is not in the best interest of the common-wealth.
Themes
Power, Common-wealths, and Monarchies Theme Icon
Religion Theme Icon
Reason, Fact, and Philosophy  Theme Icon
The dividing of a sovereign power is also harmful to the common-wealth and is fundamentally against the purpose of the common-wealth. To divide a power is to destroy the unity of the common-wealth and the covenant that binds them together as one. The imitation of other common-wealths, such as those belonging to the Greeks and the Romans, is also harmful to the health and maintenance of a common-wealth, as such societies believed the killing of a king lawful if said king was deemed a tyrant.
The Greeks and Romans lived in democracies, not monarchies, and they believed democracies to be the height of freedom. As a royalist, Hobbes does not believe in regicide (the killing of king) regardless of the reason; thus, it is not advisable to look to a democratic common-wealth for guidance in maintaining a monarchy.
Themes
Power, Common-wealths, and Monarchies Theme Icon
Literary Devices
Just as some doctors claim every person has three souls, some people argue that a common-wealth, too, has more than one soul. In some cases, there are two common-wealths inhabited by the same subjects. But, Hobbes says, “a Kingdome divided in it selfe” cannot stand. The distinction between a “Temporall” common-wealth and a “Ghostly” common-wealth gives every subject two masters, and one cannot follow two masters at one time without contradicting one or the other. In this “disease,” there is an “unnaturall spirit” that acts on the nerves of the soul and brain of the common-wealth that is bound to result in oppression and war.
According to Plato’s theory of the human soul, a single person has three souls: the logos, which is the logical part of the human mind; the thymos, which deals with emotion; and eros, which is one’s desires. Plato considered each of these souls to be an essence, which, as a materialist, Hobbes again disagrees with. The self cannot be divided into the three parts, just as the power of a sovereign cannot be reduced or divided. The two kingdoms Hobbes speaks of here are the common-wealth and the Kingdome of God. As one cannot inhabit both kingdoms at once, one’s loyalty must remain with an earthly sovereign power.
Themes
Nature, War, and Civil Society   Theme Icon
Power, Common-wealths, and Monarchies Theme Icon
Religion Theme Icon
Reason, Fact, and Philosophy  Theme Icon
Literary Devices
Get the entire Leviathan LitChart as a printable PDF.
Leviathan PDF
A common-wealth that is too large can also be harmful, as large common-wealths require large armies and corporations, which are like “many lesser Common-wealths in the bowels of a greater, like wormes in the entrayles of a natural man.” In war, if the common-wealth is not the victor, the common-wealth is automatically dissolved.    
Hobbes again refers to a common-wealth as a human body and claims a large army or too many corporations can clog “the bowels” of a common-wealth. A large army or corporation can rise up and seize power from the sovereign, which voids the covenant and reverts the common-wealth back to a state of nature.
Themes
Nature, War, and Civil Society   Theme Icon
Power, Common-wealths, and Monarchies Theme Icon
Literary Devices