Need another quote?
Need analysis on another quote?
Need analysis for a quote we don't cover?
Need analysis for a quote we don't cover?
Need analysis for a quote we don't cover?
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
Request it
Request it
Request analysis
Request analysis
Request analysis

Prologue Quotes

The best time to cry is at night, when the lights are out and someone is being beaten up and screaming for help. That way if you sniffle a little they won’t hear you. If anybody knows that you are crying, they’ll start talking about it and soon it’ll be your turn to get beat up when the lights go out.

Related Characters: Steve Harmon (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 1
Explanation and Analysis:
This is Steve Harmon’s opening line, his introduction to his life in jail. By opening the novel this way, Myers immediately establishes that ruthless and disturbing violence (someone screaming for help suggests that it is one person methodically hurting another, rather than a reciprocal fight) and internal pain coexist in Steve’s world. The manner in which Steve uses another person’s pain to protect himself and cover the sound of his own pain reflects the manner in which people in Steve’s world often inflict violence on others to protect themselves or cover for their own weakness. Additionally, Steve’s fear that he Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae volupta

Monday, July 6th Quotes

STENOGRAPHER: I hope this case lasts two weeks. I can sure use the money.

GUARD1: Six days—maybe seven. It’s a motion case. They go through the motions; then they lock them up.

Related Characters: Steve Harmon
Page Number and Citation: 14
Explanation and Analysis:
As Steve waits to be led into the courtroom to begin his trial, the court stenographer and a guard talk about how long the case will last. This brief exchange reveals that even employed individuals in the Harlem area financially struggle, which sheds some light on the desperation that Steve and the people in his neighborhood feel and the high levels of crime and violence that result. More importantly, however, the guard’s admission that the court will simply run Steve through the motions and then lock him up suggests that even before his trial begins, his guilt is a foregone Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti sol

Most people in our community are decent, hardworking citizens who pursue their own interests legally and without infringing on the rights of others. But there are also monsters in our communities—people who are willing to steal and to kill, people who disregard the rights of others.

Related Characters: Sandra Petrocelli (speaker), Steve Harmon, James King
Related Symbols: Monster
Page Number and Citation: 21
Explanation and Analysis:
In her opening remarks against Steve and James King, state prosecutor Sandra Petrocelli argues that there are effectively two types of people: hardworking law-abiding citizens, and criminal monsters. Petrocelli’s labeling of Steve as a monster will define the way that he sees himself throughout the story, establishing the image of a monster as a symbolic reflection of Steve’s guilt, shame, regret, and even self-contempt brought on by his involvement in the trial. Even though the novel ultimately implies that Steve is guilty of being involved in King’s crime, Petrocelli’s categorization of people is certainly dehumanizing towards Steve and ignores any Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis con

[Steve] is writing the word Monster over and over again. A white hand (O’BRIEN’s) takes the pencil from his hand and crosses out all the Monsters.

Related Characters: Sandra Petrocelli, Kathy O’Brien, Steve Harmon
Related Symbols: Monster
Page Number and Citation: 24
Explanation and Analysis:
After Petrocelli calls Steve a monster, he starts scribbling it across his notebook over and over until O’Brien stops him. Steve’s obsession with the idea of a monster and the manner in which he constantly labels himself with it suggest that he internalizes Petrocelli’s dehumanizing label of him, demonstrating the tragic manner in which dehumanized people often take a sub-human identity onto themselves to agree with what the rest of the world tells them. The concept of a monster, in this case, works as a symbolic reflection of Steve’s guilt and regret over his alleged participation in a crime, as Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recus

Wednesday, July 8 Quotes

Miss O’Brien says that Petrocelli is using Bolden’s testimony as part of a trail that will lead to me and James King. I think she is wrong. I think they are bringing out all of these people and letting them look terrible on the stand and sound terrible and then reminding the the jury that they don’t look any different from me and King.

Related Characters: Steve Harmon (speaker), Kathy O’Brien, James King, Wendell Bolden, Sandra Petrocelli
Page Number and Citation: 60
Explanation and Analysis:
In his notes, Steve reflects that Petrocelli’s strategy seems more reliant on making Steve appear to be a terrible person in poor company, rather than building an actual case out of evidence against him. By adopting this strategy rather than building a straightforward, strictly evidence-based case, Petrocelli denies Steve the chance to be his own person and present himself as he truly is, rather than as one of many criminals paraded before the jury. This not only represents yet another injustice on the part of the justice system, but also another method of dehumanization, since it takes away Steve’s personhood Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam of

I want to look like a good person. I want to feel like I’m a good person because I believe I am. But being in here with these guys makes it hard to think about yourself being different. We look about the same, and though I’m younger than they are, it’s hard not to notice that we are all pretty young.

Related Characters: Steve Harmon (speaker)
Related Symbols: Monster
Page Number and Citation: 62
Explanation and Analysis:
A preacher visits the inmates in jail offering to speak or pray one-on-one with anyone who wants to. Several people do, including Steve, but an inmate starts yelling and cursing that the other inmates shouldn’t pretend to be holy; it’s too late for them. This scene suggests that, although Steve has taken the symbolic identity of being a monster onto himself, some part of him still fights to see himself as a good man, and speaking to the preacher would perhaps reinforce that for him. The irate inmate’s cursing and yelling about how they’re all just criminals suggests that Steve’s Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corr

STEVE: I thought you’re supposed to be innocent until proven guilty?

O’BRIEN: That’s true, but in reality it depends on how the jury sees the case. If they see it as a contest between the defense and the prosecution as to who’s lying, they’ll vote for the prosecution. The prosecutor walks around looking very important. No one is accusing her of being a bad person. They’re accusing you of being a monster.

Related Characters: Kathy O’Brien (speaker), Steve Harmon (speaker), Sandra Petrocelli
Related Symbols: Monster
Page Number and Citation: 62
Explanation and Analysis:
O’Brien counsels Steve that more than just not seeming guilty, he’ll have to proactively prove his own innocence, since the jury will naturally give the prosecutor the benefit of the doubt. Although in such a criminal trial, either the defense or the prosecution (or both) is effectively lying, O’Brien’s statement that they have to tiptoe and only argue that Petrocelli made an honest mistake suggests that, in the American judicial system, despite its lofty ideals, the defendant is always at a significant disadvantage. The simple fact that an individual is charged with a crime suggests to the jury that they Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum vol

Thursday, July 9th Quotes

Miss O’Brien looked at me—I didn’t see her looking at me but I knew she was. She wanted to know who I was. Who was Steve Harmon? I wanted to open my shirt and tell her to look into my heart and see who I really was, who the real Steve Harmon was.

Related Characters: Steve Harmon (speaker), Kathy O’Brien, Alguinaldo Nesbitt
Related Symbols: Monster
Page Number and Citation: 92
Explanation and Analysis:
O’Brien lets Steve see photos of the crime scene with Mr. Nesbitt’s dead body lying on the ground, in part to gauge his reaction to the violence herself. Outside of Steve’s parents and his film teacher, O’Brien is the only character in the entire story who makes a sincere effort to know who Steve is and understand his character. Contrasting with the dehumanization that Steve experience both in court and in jail, O’Brien’s sincere interest is a light in an otherwise dismal time for Steve, someone who helps him remember that he is Steve Harmon, a person and not a Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus

King curled his lip and narrowed his eyes. What was he going to do, scare me? All of a sudden he looked funny. All the times I had looked at him and wanted to be tough like him, and now I saw him sitting in handcuffs and trying to scare me. How could he scare me? I go to bed every night terrified out of my mind.

Related Characters: Steve Harmon (speaker), James King
Page Number and Citation: 96
Explanation and Analysis:
Before their hearing, King and Steve are together in the same holding cell and King tries to intimidate Steve out of testifying against him or cutting a plea deal with the judge. Steve’s reflection on this interaction suggests several important things. First, it suggests that Steve used to look up to King as a tough and untouchable figure, presumably because that offered power and safety amidst the violence of their neighborhood. Second and more significant, Steve’s recognition that King has no real power, especially not in jail, suggests that this experience has completely shifted Steve’s paradigm about his life and Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dict

Seeing my dad cry like that was just so terrible. What was going on between us, me being his son and him being my dad, is pushed down and something else is moving up in its place. It’s like a man looking down to see his son and seeing a monster instead.

Related Characters: Steve Harmon (speaker), Mr. Harmon
Related Symbols: Monster
Page Number and Citation: 116
Explanation and Analysis:
Steve’s father visits him in a private meeting room and expresses his grief that his son has gotten involved in such a mess—it was not what Mr. Harmon had dreamed his son’s future would be. Steve’s feels that their father-son relationship is broken, replaced by a relationship between a father and a monster. This seems in part a reflection of Steve’s own internalized dehumanization. Since he is a subjective, unreliable narrator, it is possible that he is blowing events out of proportion, but Mr. Harmon is genuinely crushed that his son is now in a criminal trial, and it is Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Volup

Friday, July 10th Quotes

I remembered Miss O’Brien saying that it was her job to make me different in the eyes of the jury, different from Bobo and Osvaldo and King. It was me, I thought as I tried not to throw up, that had wanted to be tough like them.

Related Characters: Steve Harmon (speaker), Richard “Bobo” Evans, Kathy O’Brien, Osvaldo Cruz, James King
Page Number and Citation: 130
Explanation and Analysis:
Steve reflects that O’Brien’s main goal is to differentiate him from the other three alleged participants in the robbery, even though Steve had once wanted to be like them. There is an ironic parallel in the way that both the courtroom and Steve’s neighborhood are both dominated by the need to be perceived in a certain way. In the courtroom, Steve’s guilt or innocence seems entirely based on whether the jury perceives him as a good-natured kid wrongly implicated in a criminal act or as a criminal himself like all the rest. In Steve’s neighborhood, his safety seems largely tied Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque

Saturday, July 11th Quotes

He said he wasn’t guilty because he hadn’t taken anything out of the store. He didn’t even have a gun, just had his hand in his pocket like he had a gun.

“What they charging you with?” somebody asked.

“Armed robbery, unlawful detention, possession of a deadly weapon, assault, and menacing.”

Related Characters: Steve Harmon (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 142
Explanation and Analysis:
While Steve is thinking about what it means to be truly guilty of a crime, he recalls a white guy who attempted a failed robbery and eventually called the police himself, after he trapped himself in the store, but was charged with several maximum penalties just the same. Although this person arguably did commit a crime by even attempting to rob the store—and locking the shopkeepers in a back room—it is undeniably absurd to charge him with assault and possession of a deadly weapon if the man was not carrying any weapon at all and didn’t touch anyone. Just as Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Moll

There was a fight just before lunch and a guy was stabbed in the eye. The guy who was stabbed was screaming, but that didn’t stop the other guy from hitting him more. Violence here is always happening or just about ready to happen. I think these guys like it—they want it to be normal because that’s what they’re used to dealing with.

Related Characters: Steve Harmon (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 144
Explanation and Analysis:
Steve’s notes about life in jail are interwoven with brief episodes of violence, such as this one, inserted between Steve’s reflection on the meaning of guilt and a visit from his family. Steve’s narration about violence seems both horrifying in its cruelty and yet mundane because of the small amount of thought that he gives to it, suggesting that witnessing such violence is becoming a common occurrence for him. His observation that inmates fight to make life seem normal, combined with the sheer amount of violence that Steve records, suggests that jail does nothing to rehabilitate inmates out of their Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Ve

Sunday, July 12th Quotes

I think I finally understand why there are so many fights. In here all you have going for you is the little surface stuff, how people look at you and what they say. And if that’s all you have, then you have to protect that. Maybe that’s right.

Related Characters: Steve Harmon (speaker)
Related Symbols: Monster
Page Number and Citation: 154-155
Explanation and Analysis:
Steve speculates on why the inmates fight so often. His reflection is sympathetic and sensitive, demonstrating an ability to look past his own aversion to such violence and see the inmates not as monsters but as people with complex motivations and emotions, even if not admirable ones. Like in the courtroom, in jail the manner in which one is received by the people around them seems critically important, and if being regarded as weak threatens one’s future safety, it’s understandable that inmates would fight savagely to protect their tough reputation. At the same time, Steve’s understanding of such violence could Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore.

Tuesday, July 14th Quotes

[O’Brien] said that Bobo’s testimony hurt us a lot and that she had to find a way to separate me from King, but King’s lawyer wanted to make sure the jury connected us because I looked like a pretty decent guy.

Related Characters: Steve Harmon (speaker), Asa Briggs, Richard “Bobo” Evans, Kathy O’Brien, James King
Page Number and Citation: 201
Explanation and Analysis:
After Bobo’s testimony, O’Brien is worried that Briggs will try to tie King and Steve’s fates together to increase King’s chances of being exonerated, even though he is clearly guilty. The manner in which Briggs is willing to risk Steve’s fate, even though he is possibly innocent, in order to increase his meager chance of defending King, who is clearly guilty, suggests that Steve is little more than a pawn being shifted around between attorneys, each angling for their own strategic advantage that will provide the most benefit to their own careers. The fact that Steve’s well-being as an individual Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Reru

There are a lot of things you can do with film, but you don’t have unlimited access to your audience. In other words, keep it simple. You tell the story; you don’t look for the camera technician to tell the story for you. When you see a filmmaker getting too fancy, you can bet he’s worried either about his story or about his ability to tell it.

Related Characters: Mr. Sawicki (speaker), James King, Asa Briggs, Steve Harmon
Page Number and Citation: 214
Explanation and Analysis:
While Briggs makes his defense for James King with flimsy and convoluted arguments, Steve recalls a lesson Mr. Sawicki gave about clean storytelling and the mark of someone unconfident in the strength of their story or argument. Though not stated explicitly, Mr. Sawicki’s lesson obviously applies to Briggs’s defense of King—if Briggs truly believed that King was innocent, he would be able to make clean, straightforward cases for King’s non-involvement in the crime. His meandering arguments strongly suggest that Briggs has no confidence in the arguments he is making. However, Sawicki’s lesson also pertains to the style of the novel Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore

If you don’t testify, you’ll just make the tie between you and King stronger in the mind of the jury. I think you have to testify. And the way you spend the rest of your youth might well depend on how much the jury believes you.

Related Characters: Kathy O’Brien (speaker), Asa Briggs, James King, Steve Harmon
Page Number and Citation: 216
Explanation and Analysis:
After Briggs makes his weak defense for James King, O’Brien tells Steve that he needs to testify in order to change the jury’s opinion of who he is as a person, and his success will have life-affecting consequences. The amount of pressure suddenly placed on 16-year-old Steve is overwhelming, particularly since he is still just a kid. (This implicitly criticizes the practice of sentencing children as adults.) What is more significant, however, is the manner in which Steve’s guilt or innocence is hinged only on the jury’s perception of him as a person, not of whether he is truly guilty Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupt

The prosecutor said I was lying. I wanted to ask her what she expected me to do when telling the truth was going to get me 10 years […]. You get up on the witness stand and the prosecutor talks about looking for truth when they really mean they looking for a way to stick you under the jail.

Related Characters: Steve Harmon
Page Number and Citation: 220-222
Explanation and Analysis:
As Steve prepares to testify, he recalls a conversation he overheard between two inmates about truth and lies. Steve tries to interject that truth is what is true, but one inmate argues that truth doesn’t matter in the courtroom. The inmate’s argument that even the prosecutor is not trying to establish the truth, but rather trying to  convince the jury that the defendant is guilty enough to throw in prison, again suggests that criminal trials are a poor method for establishing the truth of an event, and instead operate as a contest to see who can lie, convince, and manipulate Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus vol

O’BRIEN: One last question. Were you in any way involved with the crime that we are discussing here? To make it clear—were you, in any way, involved with the holdup and murder that occurred on the 22nd of December?

STEVE: No, I was not.

Related Characters: Kathy O’Brien (speaker), Steve Harmon (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 224
Explanation and Analysis:
After much coaching from O’Brien, and despite privately admitting to being in the drugstore on the day of the murder and at least knowing about the plan, Steve testifies under oath that he had absolutely no involvement in the murder or the robbery whatsoever. Seemingly like all the other witnesses on the stand, Steve lies to save himself, which on its own suggests that he is truly not so much better than the people he is trying to distance himself from, adding complexity to the reader’s perception of everyone involved. Although it would be easy to morally condemn Steve’s lie, Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa.

I think [Steve’s] an outstanding young man. He is talented, bright, and compassionate. He’s very much involved with depicting his neighborhood and environment in a positive manner.

Related Characters: Mr. Sawicki (speaker), Steve Harmon
Page Number and Citation: 235
Explanation and Analysis:
Shortly after Steve lies on the witness stand and claims he was not in the drugstore on the day of the murder, Mr. Sawicki testifies as a character witness for Steve, describing him as sensitive, intelligent, and a benefit to his community. Sawicki’s testimony is important to re-establishing that, even though the reader knows that Steve just lied under oath, he is a good kid at heart caught in a terrible and compromising situation. The good that Mr. Sawicki sees in Steve, especially in the way that he wants to portray his notorious neighborhood in a more positive light, suggests Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis

Friday afternoon, July 17th Quotes

[O’BRIEN’s] lips tense; she is pensive. She gathers her papers and moves away as STEVE, arms still outstretched, turns toward the camera. His image is in black and white, and the grain is nearly broken. It looks like one of the pictures they use for psychological testing, or some strange beast, a monster.

Related Characters: Steve Harmon, Kathy O’Brien
Related Symbols: Monster
Page Number and Citation: 276
Explanation and Analysis:
In the last moment of the novel, after the jury declares Steve innocent, Steve reaches to hug O’Brien in gratitude and relief and she refuses him, leaving him feeling like a monster. Steve’s ending is both happy and tragic. On the one hand, he is exonerated of a crime that he arguably did play a part in, which seems the best ending that he could have hoped for. On the other hand, O’Brien, the single person involved in his trial that recognized him as a human being and sought to understand who Steve Harmon truly is, rebuffs his attempt to Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et.
No matches.