Oleanna
by David Mamet
✓

or to save your progress

Themes and Colors
The Desire for Power Theme Icon
Sexual Harassment and Political Correctness Theme Icon
Education and Elitism Theme Icon
Hypocrisy and Manipulation Theme Icon
LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Oleanna, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
Education and Elitism Theme Icon
Education and Elitism Theme Icon

John and Carol originally meet to discuss the difficulties Carol is having keeping up in John’s class, and with university life more generally. Over the course of their initial conversation in the first act, John and Carol both express the disillusionment they feel with the state of higher education in America. In the process, they become ciphers for Mamet’s argument that education has, in many ways, become an elaborate “hazing” ritual meant only to confer elite privileges on those willing to jump through a seemingly never-ending series of metaphorical hoops.

The fact that Oleanna—in many ways a bloodbath of power-grabs, conspiracies, and shocking acts of violence—is set in a university allows Mamet to explore the elitism, corruption, and moral bankruptcy that he feels lies at the heart of higher education in modern America. John, a professor, is on the verge of getting tenured at his university. Once the committee meets and confirms that John is qualified (which he already knows he is), he will have job security for life, and largely uncontested power at the university. Even though John wants tenure—and the financial security that comes with it, which will allow him to purchase a new home for his family and send his children to private school—he lambasts higher education openly in front of his frustrated, struggling student Carol. He says that he himself struggled as a student because tests, essays, and all the other benchmarks of success within education are designed “for idiots […] by idiots.” John insists that traditional education is flawed—he even goes so far as to imply that it is a failure entirely—and regards himself as a maverick who feels a “responsibility to the young.”

John’s comments are offensive to Carol—though she’s struggling to keep up in her classes and indeed has a hard time seeing the larger point of putting herself through such turmoil every day, she becomes upset when John admits that he feels education has become arbitrary and relatively pointless. Carol states that she—and many other students like her—have worked hard to gain admission to this university and others, fighting against social prejudices and economic disadvantages alike in hopes of bettering themselves and securing a good future. John’s assertion that education is pointless, Carol suggests, has the potential to create chaos and animosity rather than enlightenment—but John actually doubles down on his disdain for academic structures and policies.

When John offers Carol the chance to secure an A for the term—regardless of the bad grades she’s earned so far, at the halfway point of the semester—by attending weekly private tutorials with him in his office, he tells her that the two of them can break the rules with impunity and shirk the traditional structure of a university course. Carol is hesitant at first, and seems nearly scandalized by John’s flouting of protocol. When Carol asks John why he’d risk so much to help her, he insists it’s because he likes her and wants to help her—but Mamet seems to be suggesting that John’s desire to break the rules comes from his own need to prove to both himself and Carol that the university’s systems are outdated and irrelevant.

Even though John wants to portray himself as a contrarian who shirks the arbitrary rigors of university life, his excitement about his own candidacy for tenure—and the abject fear he feels when the security that tenure would provide is taken away after Carol accuses him of harassment—forces him to reexamine his own true beliefs. John has to admit that even though he looks down on and talks badly about the arbitrary nature of the university, he has participated in the institutional mechanisms that have afforded him power and support. He rails against the state of the university, but is completely at the mercy of the university’s maintenance of the status quo; if the institution crumbled or his tenure was revoked, he would be in trouble. When Carol’s accusations ultimately prevent John from securing tenure—and threaten to remove him from his position as a professor entirely—he realizes that even if the university is a glorified “hazing” ritual, he is dependent upon the continuation of such customs.

It’s worth noting that Mamet himself attended a progressive, nontraditional secondary school and matriculated to a low-residency college program before ultimately working as a professor at the college from which he graduated. John’s views on education are, perhaps, similar to Mamet’s—given his nontraditional background in education and his controversial politics, it’s fair to extrapolate from Oleanna’s overall contempt for higher education that Mamet, too, sees the institution of the American university as a failure. Ultimately, as John’s career is sacrificed to protocol and red tape, Mamet suggests that even if the university is a corrupt institution with no modern utility or relevance, it will continue on in its present form—for better or for worse.

Related Themes from Other Texts
Compare and contrast themes from other texts to this theme…

Education and Elitism ThemeTracker

The ThemeTracker below shows where, and to what degree, the theme of Education and Elitism appears in each act of Oleanna. Click or tap on any chapter to read its Summary & Analysis.
How often theme appears:
act length:
Get the entire Oleanna LitChart as a printable PDF.
"My students can't get enough of your charts and their results have gone through the roof." -Graham S.
Oleanna PDF

Education and Elitism Quotes in Oleanna

Below you will find the important quotes in Oleanna related to the theme of Education and Elitism.

Act 1 Quotes

JOHN: What is a “term of art”? It seems to mean a term, which has come, through its use, to mean something more specific than the words would, to someone not acquainted with them … indicate. That, I believe, is what a “term of art,” would mean. (Pause)

CAROL: You don’t know what it means…?

JOHN: I’m not sure that I know what it means. It’s one of those things, perhaps you’ve had them, that, you look them up, or have someone explain them to you, and you say “aha,” and you immediately forget what…

CARO: You don’t do that.

Related Characters: John (speaker), Carol (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 3
Explanation and Analysis:
When Carol asks John, her professor, what the phrase “term of art”—a phrase she’s just overheard him use on a phone call—means, he struggles to answer her, providing a vague and rambling response. When Carol calls him out on his ignorance, he tries to defend himself—but Carol sees through his act, and continues to assert that he’s wrong. This exchange, which occurs very early on in the play, hints at the underlying resentment Carol has towards John—and the desperate power plays between the two, often related to language and academia, which will come to define the play itself. John’s elitism Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Op

CAROL: I did what you told me. I did, I did everything that, I read your book, you told me to buy your book and read it. Everything you say I … (She gestures to her notebook.) (The phone rings.) I do…. Ev…

JOHN:… look:

CAROL: …everything I’m told…

JOHN: Look. Look. I’m not your father. (Pause.)

CAROL: What?

JOHN: I’m.

CAROL: Did I say you were my father?

Related Characters: Carol (speaker), John (speaker)
Related Symbols: John’s Phone
Page Number and Citation: 8-9
Explanation and Analysis:
Carol complains that in spite of doing “everything” John has told her to do to pass his course—presumably in shorter asides after class—she’s still unable to understand the material or keep up with her seemingly carefree classmates. John, frustrated with her whining, retorts that he’s not Carol’s father. The piercing rejoinder—patriarchal, condescending, clipped, and cruel—throws Carol off-guard, and represents one of the first major communicative issues the pair has throughout the play. John acts callously towards Carol when she’s in a moment of need—and seemingly realizes what he’s said as soon as he’s said it. John purports to want to Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim

JOHN: I’ll tell you a story about myself. (Pause) Do you mind? (Pause) I was raised to think myself stupid. That’s what I want to tell you. (Pause.)

CAROL: What do you mean?

JOHN: Just what I said. I was brought up, and my earliest, and most persistent memories are of being told that I was stupid. “You have such intelligence. Why must you behave so stupidly?” Or, “Can’t you understand? Can’t you understand?” And I could not understand. I could not understand.

Related Characters: John (speaker), Carol (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 15
Explanation and Analysis:
John tries to get through to Carol—to level with her and express empathy—by telling her about his own early struggles with education in childhood. He says he knows how she’s feeling as she flounders in her university classes—he, too  was made to feel stupid and inadequate by those who should have been teaching and helping him rather than tearing him down. This passage represents one of many instances in the first act in which John attempts to get closer to Carol and help her feel better by revealing something personal. Carol, however, reads these attempts inappropriate and crossing a line—or Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis.

JOHN: If I fail all the time, it must be that I think of myself as a failure. If I do not want to think of myself as a failure, perhaps I should begin by succeeding now and again. Look. The tests you see, which you encounter, in school, in college, in life, were designed, in the most part, for idiots. By idiots. There is no need to fail at them. They are not a test of your worth. They are a test of your ability to retain and spout back misinformation. Of course you fail them. They’re nonsense.

Related Characters: John (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 22
Explanation and Analysis:
John is an iconoclastic figure at his university—he sees higher education as little more than a “hazing” ritual, and he has nothing but contempt for the ways in which people see modern higher education as a requirement rather than a privilege. As he attempts to comfort Carol, who is struggling to prove herself academically, he does so by trying to make her feel better about being unsuited to traditional testing methods. This passage reveals John’s utter lack of regard for traditional structures—and yet as a professor, he is complicit in maintaining these rituals, issuing tests and essays to his students Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia

CAROL: There are rules.

JOHN: Well. We’ll break them.

CAROL: How can we?

JOHN: We won’t tell anybody.

CAROL: Is that all right?

JOHN: I say that’s fine.

CAROL: Why would you do this for me?

JOHN: I like you.

Related Characters: John (speaker), Carol (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 26
Explanation and Analysis:
When John offers Carol the chance to start his class over by attending weekly tutorials in his office—tutorials which will, it seems, consist of an unstructured, at times chaotic, and even problematic dialogue like the one they’ve been having for the duration of the first act—she seems skeptical of his offer. She has been failing his class, and though she’s desperate for a way to turn her grade around, she’s suspicious of John’s motives in allowing her exactly what she wants. John insists he “like[s]” Carol and simply wants to help her learn—but his motives are perhaps not truly so Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi nece

CAROL: I was saying … I was saying … (She checks her notes.) How can you say in a class. Say in a college class, that college education is prejudice?

[…]

JOHN: … that’s my job, don’t you know.

CAROL: What is?

JOHN: To provoke you.

Related Characters: John (speaker), Carol (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 31
Explanation and Analysis:
When John makes a controversial statement about college, stating that it’s “prejudice”—in other words, an “unreasoned,” unfounded, and unquestioned belief held by a large group of people—Carol becomes upset and nearly irate. She is offended by John’s dismissal of an experience that she and many of her peers have worked hard to earn the chance at having—but John insists it’s his “job” to “provoke” students like Carol into considering controversial points of view. This moment demonstrates John’s desire for power over his students’ thoughts and experiences, his lack of regard for political correctness, his disrespect for the very institution which Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus

CAROL: But how do they feel? Being told they are wasting their time?

JOHN: I don’t think I’m telling them that.

CAROL: You said that education was “prolonged and systematic hazing.”

JOHN: Yes. It can be so.

CAROL: …if education is so bad, why do you do it?

JOHN: I do it because I love it.

Related Characters: John (speaker), Carol (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 34
Explanation and Analysis:
Carol points out that John’s cavalier rejection of modern education as little more than a “hazing” ritual is not a helpful, illuminating “provocation” for his students to consider. Rather, it is a cruel, thoughtless indictment of their choices, and their belief in the power of education to make them better people. John reveals what a hypocrite he is in this passage, as he claims to “love” education even though he wants to go beyond criticizing it and condemn it entirely. John is able to talk the way he talks because of the privilege and power he has due to his Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commod

Act 2 Quotes

JOHN: You see, (pause) I love to teach. And flatter myself I am skilled at it. And I love the, the aspect of performance. I think I must confess that. When I found I loved to teach I swore that I would not become that cold, rigid automaton of an instructor which I had encountered as a child. Now, I was not unconscious that it was given me to err upon the other side. And, so, I asked and ask myself if I engaged in heterodoxy, I will not say “gratuitously” for I do not care to posit orthodoxy as a given good—but, “to the detriment of, of my students.”

Related Characters: John (speaker), Carol
Page Number and Citation: 41-43
Explanation and Analysis:
As act two opens, it becomes clear from the opening monologue delivered by John—this speech—that the power dynamics between him and Carol have shifted. His tone is subdued and explanatory—he is trying to explain himself to her in an earnest tone rather than speaking wildly and chaotically about whatever tangential topic his whims suggest. At the same time, his speech here—even when he’s trying to really level with Carol—is designed to alienate her and confuse her. It’s almost as if John has truly lost sight of how to get through his students, and is only able to speak in the Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Moll

JOHN: Well, all right. (Pause) Let’s see. (He reads.) I find that I am sexist. That I am elitist. I’m not sure I know what that means, other than it’s a derogatory word, meaning “bad.” That I… That I insist on wasting time, in nonprescribed, in self-aggrandizing and theatrical diversions from the prescribed text … that these have taken both sexist and pornographic forms … here we find listed […] instances “…closeted with a student” … “Told a rambling, sexually explicit story […] moved to embrace said student and … all part of a pattern …”

Related Characters: John (speaker), Carol
Page Number and Citation: 47
Explanation and Analysis:
As John reads aloud from the harassment complaint Carol has filed against him with the tenure committee, he sees himself through her eyes for the first time—and is completely unwilling to believe that there is even a grain of truth in any of her allegations. However, as audiences hear John recite Carol’s list of grievances, it’s easy to recognize the incidents, sentences, and speeches which her allegations point to. There was no real sexual charge to the interactions between John and Carol in the first act, and though his benign rambling about the state of higher education read more as Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesc

CAROL: I don’t care what you feel. Do you see? DO YOU SEE? You can’t do that anymore. You. Do. Not. Have. The. Power. Did you misuse it? Someone did. Are you part of that group? Yes. Yes. You Are. You’ve done these things.

Related Characters: Carol (speaker), John
Page Number and Citation: 49
Explanation and Analysis:
When John tries to tell Carol that the things in her report are mere allegations—not facts—Carol tries to explain to John that he is not the one who gets to decide how he makes other people feel. She refuses to allow him to condescend to her anymore—she has taken decisive action to take away his “power” to do so. She is the one with the upper hand now, and she wants to use her newfound position to tell John the things she was no doubt thinking privately throughout the entire first act. She accuses John of misusing his power, acting Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore

CAROL: How can you deny it. You did it to me. Here. You did… You confess. You love the Power. To deviate. To invent, to transgress […] whatever norms have been established for us. […] And you pick those things which you feel advance you: publication, tenure, and the steps to get them you call “harmless rituals.” And you perform those steps. Although you say it is hypocrisy. […] You call education “hazing,” and from your so-protected, so-elitist seat you hold our confusion as a joke, and our hopes and efforts with it. Then you sit there and say “what have I done?”

Related Characters: Carol (speaker), John
Page Number and Citation: 51
Explanation and Analysis:
As John tries to deny many of the allegations Carol has made against him, she points out how ludicrous it is for John to sit before her and try to deny them. John doesn’t want to admit to his misogyny, his elitism, his manipulation, and his hypocrisy—even when his actions and comments from the first act, when taken out of context, paint a picture of him as a condescending, sexist, and needlessly provocative figure who openly relishes the power he’s been given by the very systems he rails against. That is, John literally confessed to many of the charges before Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debit

Act 3 Quotes

JOHN: They’re going to discharge me.

CAROL: As full well they should. You don’t understand? You’re angry? What has led you to this place? Not your sex. Not your race. Not your class. YOUR OWN ACTIONS. And you’re angry. You ask me here. What do you want? You want to “charm” me. You want to “convince” me. You want me to recant. I will not recant.

Related Characters: Carol (speaker), John (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 64
Explanation and Analysis:
In act three, John summons Carol to his office to talk with her once more—and despite their disastrous conversation in the second act, she agrees. It soon becomes clear that John wants to double down on his attempt to manipulate Carol into recanting her statements to the tenure committee—not only has he lost his chance at tenure and forfeited the house he hoped to buy, but he is, he says, soon going to be discharged from the university entirely. Carol, though, feels no sympathy or pity for John—she wants him to see that he is not a victim, and that Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corr

CAROL: Even if I were inclined, to what, forgive? Forget? What? Overlook your…

JOHN: …my behavior?

CAROL: …it would be wrong.

JOHN: Even if you were inclined to “forgive” me.

CAROL: It would be wrong.

JOHN: And what would transpire.

CAROL: Transpire?

JOHN: Yes.

CAROL: “Happen?”

JOHN: Yes.

CAROL: Then say it. For Christ’s sake. Who the hell do you think that you are? You want a post. You want unlimited power. To do and to say what you want. As it pleases you—Testing, Questioning, Flirting…

Related Characters: Carol (speaker), John (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 65-66
Explanation and Analysis:
As John begs Carol to retract her claim of sexual harassment against him, she faces a moral conundrum. She tells John plainly that for her to recant would be morally “wrong”—even if she did privately forgive him, she could never do so publicly at the expense of her group, her morals, and her ideals. When John asks what would “transpire” were Carol to forgive him publicly and recant, Carol seizes on John’s inability to restrain himself from using elitist language and trying to use it to assert his power, over her even in a conversation which should be genuine. She Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asp

CAROL: Do you hate me now? (Pause)

JOHN: Yes.

CAROL: Why do you hate me? Because you think me wrong? No. Because I have, you think, power over you. Listen to me. Listen to me, Professor. (Pause) It is the power that you hate. So deeply that, that any atmosphere of free discussion is impossible. It’s not “unlikely.” It’s impossible. Isn’t it?

JOHN: Yes.

Related Characters: Carol (speaker), John (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 68
Explanation and Analysis:
Here, Carol asserts that John’s hatred of her stems from the fact that she now has power over him—power she’s gained by outwitting him and manipulating him. She suggests that a powerful man like John is so incensed and indignant about having his power stripped from him that it literally prevents him from having a “free discussion” with someone more powerful than him. John confirms Carol’s accusation—speaking, perhaps, the first honest words the two of them have really exchanged in the entirety of the play’s action. John has denied or ignored his own love of power thus far, insisting that Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque erro

CAROL: Do you want our support? That is the only quest…

JOHN: …to ban my book…?

CAROL: …that is correct…

JOHN: …this…this is a university… we… […] No, no. It’s out of the question. I’m sorry. I don’t know what I was thinking of. I want to tell you something I’m a teacher. […] It’s my name on the door, and I teach the class, and that’s what I do. I’ve got a book with my name on it. And my son will see that book someday. And I have a respon… No, I’m sorry I have a responsibility… to myself, to my son, to my profession…

Related Characters: Carol (speaker), John (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 75
Explanation and Analysis:
In the depths of his despair, John receives what seems to be a life raft from Carol—she offers him to recant her statement to the tenure committee and even try to reason with them in his favor. The condition, however, is that John remove a list of books—including his own textbook—from the university’s curriculum. John decides that nothing—not even the chance at personal and professional salvation—is worth renouncing his work. This choice demonstrates just how self-obsessed John is, but it also seems to confirm that he does have some kind of moral code. For all the flaws and problems within Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt