Rising Out of Hatred

by

Eli Saslow

Teachers and parents! Our Teacher Edition on Rising Out of Hatred makes teaching easy.

Rising Out of Hatred: Chapter 8 Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
Allison grew up learning how to debate; Julie encouraged her to think critically about rules. Now, Allison feels more prepared than ever to begin debating Derek in earnest, with science and theory. She enrolls in a course called Stigma and Prejudice that fall, a class that addresses how stereotypes can be assessed and changed. As part of the class’s introduction, the professor shows a 2000 HBO documentary called Hate.Com, which is about the rise of bigotry on the internet. Derek and Don appear early in the documentary.
Because Allison now understands Derek’s beliefs more fully, she is able to start dismantling them—even taking a class to help her do so. This is only possible because she has taken the time to get to know Derek and to have open dialogue about his beliefs. Meanwhile, the fact that Derek and Don appear in a documentary about bigotry on the internet shows just how impactful they have been in promoting racist rhetoric online.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
White Supremacy and Racism Theme Icon
Allison takes copious notes in the class, arming herself for her next conversation with Derek. They’ve been spending more time than ever together, both thinking that they are most comfortable with each other. And the more they spend time together, the more Allison thinks that Derek can make a full transformation. They argue online as she questions what he’s so afraid of about the changing demographics in the U.S. When he explains that he’s afraid white people will become a minority, she states that in the future, people will be more accepting of differences because there will be more diversity. Derek counters that “diversity typically means strife.”
Allison continues to make progress with changing Derek’s beliefs, knowing that the more she questions his ideas, the more Derek might question them, too. She points out the flaws in some of his deep-seated beliefs, engaging with him in good-faith arguments while still respecting his fears. Even though Derek believes that “diversity typically means strife,” the irony in this is that the “strife” Derek refers to has historically stemmed from white supremacists resisting diversity.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
White Supremacy and Racism Theme Icon
Allison also explains that race is a modern concept that is impossible to define, citing myriad studies. When Derek asserts that white people generally have higher IQ tests, Allison sends him research about the shortcomings of IQ tests and more recent studies based on better data. These studies show that nominal differences in IQ can be explained by cultural bias in IQ tests and outside factors like educational and health discrepancies, which are more likely to affect non-white people. She sends Derek information on systemic oppression—how non-white people face more obstacles and have fewer opportunities.
Allison not only makes her cases by teasing out Derek’s arguments, but she also does research in order to counter some of Derek’s points. Again, this is only possible because she actually gets to know the details of Derek’s thoughts—like his belief that white people generally have higher IQs. Here, she points out that white supremacy is a contributing factor that has made it more difficult for non-white people to access opportunities, which allows white supremacists to further justify their own arguments.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
White Supremacy and Racism Theme Icon
Derek counters that white people are oppressed by policies like immigration and affirmative action, but Allison shows that the opposite is true: white people are overrepresented in government and are more likely to be promoted over similarly qualified non-white candidates. White people enjoy advantages ranging from lower prices at car dealerships to better fruit in grocery stores. Even if Derek rarely agrees with her points, she’s glad he’s reading her links.
Notably, that Allison doesn’t expect Derek to agree with her right away. What’s more important, she finds, is that they are actually having a conversation and that Derek is absorbing the arguments and facts she is presenting. This reinforces why ostracism doesn’t always work, because it leaves no room for people to make a gradual transformation. This mirrors the way in which people become radicalized through a gradual process, becoming further and further entrenched in certain circles and ideologies.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
Get the entire Rising Out of Hatred LitChart as a printable PDF.
Rising Out of Hatred PDF
While Allison and Derek usually stick to logic, sometimes Allison wants their conversations to be emotionally charged. White nationalism isn’t just a thought experiment: it’s also a harmful ideology that causes real damage to people’s lives. Non-white victims of prejudice are more likely to suffer from heart disease, depression, and suppressed immunity. White people in the same studies did not show a physical response to prejudice, which starts to make Derek wonder if he is wrong about white people experiencing prejudice. He starts to do research on his own.
Even though Derek asserts that he’s not trying to hurt people like other white supremacists do, and that racism is bad, Allison illustrates how white nationalism is harming people. Words can have tangible repercussions because they reinforce prejudices that then lead to health problems, as Allison notes here, as well as other concrete forms of discrimination. All of Allison’s arguments cumulatively seem to be working, as Derek starts to question his own beliefs and do research on his own. Open dialogue thus gives Derek a starting point to at least reconsider his ideology.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
White Supremacy and Racism Theme Icon
Redemption Theme Icon
Quotes
Allison brings up Juan, Moshe, and Matthew, asking about how they would fit into Derek’s idea of an all-white society. She asks about how he would feel if the situation were reversed—if people didn’t think he should be a full member of society. Derek explains that he doesn’t want white nationalism to hurt people he knows, and that he doesn’t actually expect the U.S. to become an all-white country. When Allison presses him, however, he gets vague about what he truly means or wants.
Simply having friendships with a diverse group of people becomes crucial to changing Derek’s ideology. Becoming friends with Juan, Moshe, and Matthew means that Derek can no longer depersonalize the “enemy”; now, his ideology now targets people he genuinely cares about. And, as is clear here, that makes Derek reconsider whether he actually thinks the U.S. can or should be an all-white country.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
Allison and Derek’s conversation often ends in frustration or tears, especially because their friendship has gradually evolved into a romantic relationship—and a serious one. Allison cares deeply about Derek, and she tries to explain to her mother that he’s kind, that they enjoy doing things together, that he’s supportive, and that she feels comfortable with him. Allison is happy—except for the glaring disagreements at the core of who they are as people. Sometimes Allison can forget about Derek’s white nationalism, until she’s reminded and becomes resentful of him and herself for liking him.
Allison’s internal conflict of being in a relationship with Derek connects back to the fact that she doesn’t know if it’s morally right to befriend someone with hateful beliefs. This acknowledges that while she is trying to be open and accepting of Derek so that she can change his beliefs, Derek still has a long way to go in making amends for spreading a harmful ideology.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
Redemption Theme Icon
Once, late in the fall, Derek and Allison are driving back from a trip when Allison posits what would happen if he ended up having a child with a Black woman—why that would be so wrong. He says that the child would be cursed to a life of a confused identity, but Allison counters that they have several multiracial friends on campus who do not seem unhappy or confused. She tells him that people are afraid of him because he promotes an ideology predicated on deporting Africans, Jews, and Indians, uprooting their lives. He says that he doesn’t believe in forced deportation, but maybe gradual self-deportation—eventually, in concept. Allison says that if he doesn’t want people to be afraid of what he advocates, then he shouldn’t be advocating it.
Allison again reinforces the idea that Derek’s ideas aren’t as innocent as he argues—that people on campus feel genuinely unsafe because they believe that Derek wants to remove them from society. All forms of white supremacy, even in concept, can be damaging in this way.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
White Supremacy and Racism Theme Icon
Don, on the other hand, is starting to realize that Derek’s behavior is changing. Derek logs onto Stormfront less, despite the 2012 election heating up. Don created Stormfront in 1995 and watched it and Derek grow side by side. He watched the site’s message spread and relied on Derek to keep it going. He always assumed that Derek would take it over, but he realizes that Derek might be going through a phase of fatigue with the movement—especially when he avoids coming onto the radio show for weeks at a time. Don makes excuses on the show, saying that Derek is just busy with school.
Don’s perspective in this passage illustrates that Allison’s tactics are, in fact, working—even if she doesn’t realize it yet. Her conversations with Derek have made Derek less and less comfortable with the movement, to the point that he’s distancing himself from Stormfront and even from his father to a degree. This is a key first step in Derek’s redemption: to stop perpetuating his beliefs on a large scale.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
Redemption Theme Icon
Derek, meanwhile, is wondering what he truly believes and wants to do. He’s digesting research that suggests white nationalism is dangerous and flawed. And if he returns to the radio show, his friends will be parsing every word. He and Allison take a trip with his family to Key West for three nights. Allison has fun exploring with Derek during the day. But in the evening, they get dinner with Don, Chloe, and a family friend, a noted white nationalist named Sam Dickson. Derek grew up admiring Dickson’s speeches, but because of Allison, he now realizes that Dickson’s views are cruel and extreme. Allison, meanwhile, sits in silence, disgusted. Later, Derek agrees that parts of what Dickson said were “borderline crazy.”
Again, Derek’s conversations with Allison have proved crucial to adjusting his beliefs. Really listening to her arguments and being open to others’ perspectives on white nationalism has enabled Derek to hear his father and Dickson’s discussion through a new lens. He now understands how harmful it is, to the point that he is actually siding with Allison and disagreeing with some of Dickson’s opinions—an important reversal. However, this again reinforces the idea that one of the most difficult parts of changing one’s values is detaching from one’s community.  
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
Family, Community, and Values Theme Icon
Redemption Theme Icon
Allison later travels with Derek’s family during Thanksgiving, just after Romney’s defeat in the presidential election. Despite this loss, Don thinks that white nationalism is taking hold. Romney gets the white vote by a 20 percent margin, the largest white support for a single candidate in almost 30 years—a sign that the country is segregating. Meanwhile, Donald Trump and Bill O’Reilly lament that white people are now the minority, trying to drum up anger over this development.
This passage illustrates another damaging aspect of white nationalism: political polarization, particularly based on race. Politicians and other commentators like Donald Trump and Fox News’s Bill O’Reilly use white nationalist rhetoric to further inspire fear and gain power by dividing people based on race, speaking only to white people.
Themes
White Supremacy and Racism Theme Icon
Rhetoric and Language Theme Icon
At Thanksgiving dinner, Don and Chloe ask Derek about what he thinks of the election. Part of Derek still thinks the U.S. is slipping into an abyss, but another part is personally relieved that Romney’s immigration policies won’t unravel the lives of his friends on campus. His sister asks if he’s even a white nationalist anymore. At the same time, another forum post goes around discussing Derek and saying that he’s still not welcome on campus. Derek is hurt, while Allison is both protective of him and angry with him for sticking to white nationalism.
Again, the book underscores how Derek’s views are starting to change. Because he is now friends with non-white and Jewish people who have not ostracized him, Derek has been exposed to their perspectives and can understand how immigration policies informed by white nationalism could be very harmful to them. Additionally, this passage suggests that Derek is in a difficult intermediary position. As his views are changing, he isn’t able to fully participate in either of his communities. His family now wonders if he’s still as dedicated to white nationalism, while the students at New College continue to view him as a threat to their values.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
Family, Community, and Values Theme Icon
The next morning, Allison sits in a coffee shop and reads through the thread, deciding that she wants to write a public response. She knows that Derek is reconsidering at least some of his views, and she worries that the thread will simply hold those views in place. She lists some of the things that Derek has been doing: hanging out with Jewish and Hispanic friends, not posting on Stormfront or getting on the radio. And, she notes, he’s never fought back, and attacking him isn’t productive. What is productive is meaningful dialogue about how to change oppressive structures, but not in a hostile or violent way.
Here, Allison makes the important point that dismissing people out of hand, attacking them, or ostracizing them isn’t a productive way to change people’s minds. The only way to do so—and the way that she’s been able to get Derek to start questioning his beliefs—is to have open, meaningful conversations while also fighting harmful ideologies on a structural level.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
White Supremacy and Racism Theme Icon
Later, Derek thanks Allison for defending him, but he feels guilty about dragging her into things. Some people support Allison, but others simply add to the original thread, calling Derek “disgusting” and “pure hate.” The moderator announces that he is closing the thread, but before he does, Derek decides to finally speak up. He realizes, after reading Allison’s research and his own, that he no longer believes the white nationalist myths about “Jewish manipulation,” “testosterone-fueled black aggression,” or the theory about IQ discrepancies. He no longer thinks that segregation is necessary, though he’s still concerned about the demographic decline of white Americans. He doesn’t support neo-Nazism, nor is he a part of the KKK. He doesn’t outline all of his beliefs, but he hopes it helps slightly.
Here, Derek both recognizes and proves the value of open dialogue. In contrast to the people who are dismissing Derek outright, Derek writes a thoughtful response that outlines his beliefs so that people can actually engage with him on his ideas. Moreover, he shows that because of the conversations he’s had with Allison and others, he has concretely shifted his beliefs. He is also distancing himself more and more from white supremacist communities—a key step to disentangling himself from their values.
Themes
Ostracism vs. Open Dialogue Theme Icon
White Supremacy and Racism Theme Icon
Redemption Theme Icon
After Derek sends his message, he starts to worry about it getting onto Stormfront. But privately, students start to write to him, commending him, thanking him, and apologizing. Rose writes to him for the first time in months, saying that she thought his post was good. Meanwhile, Allison contacts the SPLC anonymously, hoping that they will delete his “extremist file” on their website. She attaches the full email, and they reply saying that they want to publish the email. Allison panics and says no, but it is too late. Several days later, the SPLC contacts Derek, explaining that they are planning to write a story about his “changing ideology” and asks if he’d like to comment—they’re posting something that day.
Derek’s acknowledges his changing values and no longer spreads harmful parts of his ideology, both of which are key steps in making amends. This is why people at New College react so warmly to him. Even Rose, whom he hurt deeply, is able to appreciate his willingness to admit his mistakes. But again, this passage illustrates that Derek is still stuck between two communities: he fears rejection from his white nationalist community for his “changing ideology” while he also begins to enjoy more acceptance on campus. The SPLC’s desire to publish a story about Derek’s experiences foreshadows more conflict in Derek’s life, as publicly admitting to his “changing ideology” will likely create even more tension with his family and his white nationalist community.
Themes
Family, Community, and Values Theme Icon
Redemption Theme Icon