The Browning Version
by Terence Rattigan
Need another quote?
Need analysis on another quote?
Need analysis for a quote we don't cover?
Need analysis for a quote we don't cover?
Need analysis for a quote we don't cover?
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
Request it
Request it
Request analysis
Request analysis
Request analysis

The Browning Version Quotes

TAPLOW: (Protestingly.) I’m extremely interested in science, sir.

FRANK: Are you? I’m not. Not at least in the science I have to teach.

TAPLOW: Well, anyway, sir, it’s a good deal more exciting than this muck. (Indicating his book.)

FRANK: What is this muck?

TAPLOW: Aeschylus, sir. The Agamemnon.

FRANK: And your considered view is that the Agamemnon of Aeschylus is muck, is it?

TAPLOW: Well, no, sir. I don’t think the play is muck – exactly. I suppose, in a way, it’s rather a good plot, really, a wife murdering her husband and having a lover and all that. I only meant the way it’s taught to us – just a lot of Greek words strung together and fifty lines if you get them wrong.

Related Characters: John Taplow (speaker), Frank Hunter (speaker), Andrew Crocker-Harris
Related Symbols: The Agamemnon
Page Number and Citation: 5
Explanation and Analysis:
This exchange happens early in the play, when both Frank and Taplow are waiting to speak with Andrew. Taplow has been summoned to the Crocker-Harrises’ flat for extra work, having missed a class in the previous week. The quote serves two important functions. Firstly, it demonstrates Frank’s casual relationship with the pupils at the school; he is part of a new breed of teachers whose general manner is much more informal and laidback than Andrew’s. Secondly, it places The Agamemnon at the center of the play, where it will come to serve an important role. Taplow’s description of the plot Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas au

TAPLOW: (Mimicking a very gentle, rather throaty voice) “My dear Taplow, I have given you exactly what you deserve. No less; and certainly no more.” Do you know, sir, I think he may have marked me down, rather than up, for taking extra work. I mean, the man’s barely human. (He breaks off quickly.) Sorry, sir. Have I gone too far?

Related Characters: John Taplow (speaker), Frank Hunter, Andrew Crocker-Harris
Page Number and Citation: 6
Explanation and Analysis:
This quote is also part of Frank and Taplow’s interactions as they wait for Andrew. It further demonstrates the informality between Frank and Taplow and gives the audience a greater insight into the way Andrew is viewed by his pupils—as a kind of caricature with a host of stock phrases. This particular phrase that Taplow quotes has important reverberations for the play more generally, and though on one level it seems like a fairly hollow remark, it does seem to ironically sum up Andrew’s own situation—he definitely does not receive any more than he deserves. Taplow’s impression is not especially Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt.

FRANK: Possibly not. He ought never to have become a school master, really. Why did he?

MILLIE: It was his vocation, he said. He was sure he'd make a big success of it, especially when he got his job here first go off. (Bitterly) Fine success he’s made, hasn’t he?

FRANK: You should have stopped him.

MILLIE: How was I to know? He talked about getting a house, then a headmastership.

FRANK: The Crock a headmaster! That’s a pretty thought.

MILLIE: Yes, it’s funny to think of it now, all right. Still he wasn’t always the Crock, you know. He had a bit more gumption once. At least I thought he had. Don’t let's talk any more about him – it’s too depressing.

FRANK: I’m sorry for him.

MILLIE: (Indifferently.) He's not sorry for himself, so why should you be? It’s me you should be sorry for.

Related Characters: Frank Hunter (speaker), Millie Crocker-Harris (speaker), Andrew Crocker-Harris
Page Number and Citation: 11
Explanation and Analysis:
This quote comes from the first conversation between Frank and Millie, which takes place when she sends Taplow on an extraneous errand. She does this so she can have time alone with Frank, with whom she is having an affair. The familiar tone between the two characters gives the audience a sense of their fleeting intimacy. The quote also demonstrates Millie’s entrenched bitterness towards Andrew and the extent to which this is based on perception of him as a failure. Her blasé retelling of what were once her husbands grand ambitions serves to set up an atmosphere of sadness and Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Inc

ANDREW: However diligently I search I can discover no ‘bloody’ – no ‘corpse’– no ‘you have slain’. Simply ‘husband’–

TAPLOW: Yes, sir. That’s right.

ANDREW: Then why do you invent words that simply are not there?

TAPLOW: I thought they sounded better, sir. More exciting. After all she did kill her husband, sir. (With relish.) She’s just been revealed with his dead body and Cassandra’s weltering in gore –

ANDREW: I am delighted at this evidence, Taplow, of your interest in the rather more lurid aspects of dramaturgy, but I feel I must remind you that you are supposed to be construing Greek, not collaborating with Aeschylus.

TAPLOW: (Greatly daring.) Yes, but still, sir, translator’s licence, sir – I didn’t get anything wrong – and after all it is a play and not just a bit of Greek construe.

ANDREW: (Momentarily at a loss.) I seem to detect a note of end of term in your remarks. I am not denying that The Agamemnon is a play. It is perhaps the greatest play ever written –

TAPLOW: (Quickly.) I wonder how many people in the form think that?

Related Characters: John Taplow (speaker), Andrew Crocker-Harris
Related Symbols: The Agamemnon
Page Number and Citation: 17
Explanation and Analysis:
When Andrew arrives back at the flat, he and Taplow sit down to go through the latter’s extra Classics work, in this case consisting of the laborious line-by-line translation of The Agamemnon. Andrew’s only criterion for the quality of Taplow’s work seems to be whether or not his translation is technically correct (as opposed to dramatically effective). Taplow takes the bold move of embellishing the text, inspired by what he is reading (which is surely a significant reason for teaching in the first place). Though Andrew’s first reflex is to chastise his student for diverging from the script, Taplow’s flash Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam volu

ANDREW: (Murmuring gently, not looking at TAPLOW.) When I was a very young man, only two years older than you are now, Taplow, I wrote, for my own pleasure, a translation of The Agamemnon – a very free translation – I remember – in rhyming couplets.

TAPLOW: The whole Agamemnon – in verse? That must have been hard work, sir.

ANDREW: It was hard work; but I derived great joy from it. The play had so excited and moved me that I wished to communicate, however imperfectly, some of that emotion to others. When I had finished it. I remember, I thought it very beautiful – almost more beautiful than the original.

TAPLOW: Was it ever published, sir?

ANDREW: No. Yesterday I looked for the manuscript while I was packing my papers. I was unable to find it. I fear it is lost – like so many other things. Lost for good.

Related Characters: Andrew Crocker-Harris (speaker), John Taplow (speaker)
Related Symbols: The Agamemnon
Page Number and Citation: 18
Explanation and Analysis:
Taplow’s evident interest in Aeschylus’ tragedy stirs Andrew’s memories of his youth, reconnecting his older self with his earlier sense of ambition and passion. Andrew was once committed to his subject because of his belief in its beauty, not just as part of his job. It was a source of “joy” and he wanted to use his scholarly talent to share this with others. On the one hand, he has failed to fulfill this early ambition—but Taplow’s interest in the subject counts as a quiet triumph. Andrew clearly feels the sense of an end looming over his life, symbolized by Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati

FROBISHER: I’ve told you about him, I think. He is a very brilliant young man and won exceptionally high honours at Oxford.

ANDREW: So I understand, sir.

FROBISHER: Not, of course, as high as the honours you yourself won there. He didn't, for instance, win the Chancellor’s prize for Latin verse or the Gaisford.

ANDREW: He won the Hertford Latin, then?
FROBISHER: No. (Mildly surprised.) Did you win that, too?

ANDREW nods

FROBISHER: It’s sometimes rather hard to remember that you are perhaps the most brilliant classical scholar we have ever had at the school –

ANDREW: You are very kind.

FROBISHER: (Urbanely corrects his gaffe.) Hard to remember, I mean – because of your other activities – your brilliant work on the school timetable, for instance, and also for your heroic battle for so long and against such odds with the soul–destroying lower fifth.

Related Characters: Dr. Frobisher (speaker), Andrew Crocker-Harris (speaker), Peter Gilbert
Page Number and Citation: 20
Explanation and Analysis:
Here, the arrival of Dr. Frobisher, the school headmaster, interrupts Taplow’s lesson with Andrew. He has come to have a conversation with Andrew, first checking that the latter is aware of the imminent arrival of Peter Gilbert—Andrew’s fresh-faced replacement who will take over the Crocker-Harris apartment. Dr. Frobisher’s conversational misstep suggests how far removed Andrew’s day-to-day lived experience has become from the prestigious achievements of his early scholarly life. The headmaster tries to correct his mistake, but he can’t cover up on the truth he has accidentally revealed: that Andrew’s relevance has diminished greatly over the years.

MILLIE: The mean old brutes! My God, what I wouldn’t like to say to them! (Rounding on ANDREW.) And what did you say? Just sat there and made a joke in Latin, I suppose?

ANDREW: There wasn’t very much I could say, in Latin or any other language.

MILLIE: Oh, wasn’t there? I’d have said it all right. I wouldn’t just have sat there twiddling my thumbs and taking it from that old phoney of a headmaster. But then, of course, I’m not a man.

ANDREW is turning the pages of the Agamemnon, not looking at her.

What do they expect you to do? Live on my money, I suppose.

ANDREW: There has never been any question of that. I shall be perfectly able to support myself.

MILLIE: Yourself? Doesn’t the marriage service say something about the husband supporting his wife? Doesn’t it? You ought to know?

Related Characters: Millie Crocker-Harris (speaker), Andrew Crocker-Harris (speaker), Dr. Frobisher
Related Symbols: The Agamemnon
Page Number and Citation: 25
Explanation and Analysis:
Dr. Frobisher’s visit comes with bad news—that Andrew will not receive a pension from the school. According to the headteacher, the decision was made by the board of governors and hinged on the fact that Andrew is not quite at the usual retirement age yet (though he is close and unwell enough to have resign). Millie shows her deep frustration with Andrew’s meekness, though this concern is more motivated by worry about her own financial security than Andrew’s wellbeing. Andrew, for his part, is doing what he has become accustomed to: avoiding emotional confrontation. He stares at his book—which it’s Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Com

ANDREW: They are mostly boys of about fifteen or sixteen. They are not very difficult to handle.

GILBERT: The headmaster said you ruled them with a rod of iron. He called you the Himmler of the lower fifth.

ANDREW: Did he? The Himmler of the lower fifth? I think he exaggerated. I hope he exaggerated. The Himmler of the lower fifth?

GILBERT: (Puzzled) He only meant that you kept the most wonderful discipline. I must say I do admire you for that. I couldn’t even manage that with eleven–year–olds, so what I’ll be like with fifteens and sixteens I shudder to think.

ANDREW. It is not so difficult. They aren’t bad boys. Sometimes – a little wild and unfeeling, perhaps – but not bad. The Himmler of the lower fifth? Dear me!

Related Characters: Andrew Crocker-Harris (speaker), Peter Gilbert (speaker), Dr. Frobisher
Page Number and Citation: 28
Explanation and Analysis:
This exchange comes when Peter Gilbert, a new teacher at the school, comes to look at the flat that he and his new wife will take over from Andrew and Millie in the new term. Andrew tries to be helpful to Peter, offering his advice, but is greatly taken aback when Peter clumsily informs him that Dr. Frobisher compares him to a notorious Nazi general. The nickname also demonstrates the superficiality of the headmaster’s charm, showing that he says one thing to people’s faces and another behind their backs. Andrew’s shock is rooted in the fact that, though he knew Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaec

GILBERT: (After a pause.) I’m afraid I said something that hurt you very much. It’s myself you must forgive, sir. Believe me, I’m desperately sorry.

ANDREW: There's no need. You were merely telling me what I should have known for myself. Perhaps I did in my heart, and hadn’t the courage to acknowledge it. I knew, of course, that I was not only not liked, but now positively disliked. I had realized, too, that the boys – for many long years now – had ceased to laugh at me. I don’t know why they no longer found me a joke. Perhaps it was my illness. No, I don’t think it was that. Something deeper than that. Not a sickness of the body, but a sickness of the soul. At all events it didn’t take much discernment on my part to realize I had become an utter failure as a schoolmaster. Still, stupidly enough, I hadn’t realized that I was also feared. The Himmler of the lower fifth! I suppose that will become my epitaph.

Related Characters: Peter Gilbert (speaker), Andrew Crocker-Harris (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 29
Explanation and Analysis:
Here, Gilbert awkwardly tries to atone for informing Andrew about his “Himmler” nickname. Of course, the damage is already done and Andrew, despite his attempt to deflect any attention to his emotional life, shows that he is hurt deeply by the comment. His description of his “sickness of the soul” is part of trope running throughout the play in which Andrew is implied to be already “dead.” That is, his failure is so entrenched that life is as good as over. However, Andrew’s earlier interaction with Taplow—and the interaction to come—create a space for a gentle revival of his spirits. Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita del

GILBERT: (Brusquely.) Darling. The Crocker–Harrises, I'm sure, have far more important things to do than to listen to your detailed but inaccurate account of our very sordid little encounter. Why not just say I married you for your money and leave it at that? Come on, we must go.

MRS. GILBERT: (To MILLIE.) Isn’t he awful to me?

MILLIE: Men have no souls, my dear. My husband is just as bad.

Related Characters: Peter Gilbert (speaker), Mrs. Gilbert (speaker), Millie Crocker-Harris (speaker), Andrew Crocker-Harris
Page Number and Citation: 30
Explanation and Analysis:
This exchange comes just as Peter Gilbert and his wife go to leave the Crocker-Harris flat. Mrs. Gilbert has been looking around the property with Millie, already imagining what she will do with the space when it becomes hers. Her exchange with her husband is relatively light-hearted, and though Millie’s comment seems to match their tone, it’s uttered with a genuine bitterness directed at Andrew. It chimes with Andrew’s earlier description of himself to Gilbert as having a “sickness of the soul.” The visit of the Gilberts more generally represents a kind of “changing of the guard”—out with the old Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur m

TAPLOW: I didn’t have a chance with the head here. I rather dashed out, I’m afraid. I thought I’d just come back and – and wish you luck, sir.

ANDREW: Thank you, Taplow. That’s good of you.
TAPLOW: I – er – thought this might interest you, sir. (He quickly thrusts a small book into ANDREW’S hand.)

ANDREW: What is it?

TAPLOW: Verse translation of the Agamemnon, sir. The Browning version. It’s not much good. I've been reading it in the Chapel gardens.

ANDREW very deliberately turns over the pages of the book.

ANDREW: Very interesting, Taplow. (He seems to have a little difficulty in speaking. He clears his throat and then goes on in his level, gentle voice.) I know the translation, of course. It has its faults, I agree, but I think you will enjoy it more when you get used to the metre he employs.

He hands it to TAPLOW who brusquely thrusts it back to him.

TAPLOW: It’s for you, sir.

ANDREW: For me?

TAPLOW: Yes, sir. I’ve written in it.

Related Characters: John Taplow (speaker), Andrew Crocker-Harris (speaker)
Related Symbols: The Agamemnon
Page Number and Citation: 32
Explanation and Analysis:
This exchange comes when Taplow unexpectedly returns to Andrew’s flat, having been dismissed when the headmaster arrived earlier. Given that it’s the last day of term, Andrew is highly surprised to see one of his pupils going out of their way to show him a gesture of respect. In fact, a leaving gift from Taplow is so outside of Andrew’s realm of possibility that he thinks the book belongs to Taplow. The gift is Robert Browning’s translation of The Agamemnon, giving Rattigan’s play its title. Andrew shows the physical signs of an attempt to suppress the emotions. By this point, Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Ap

ANDREW: […] “God from afar looks graciously upon a gentle master.”

Related Characters: Andrew Crocker-Harris (speaker), John Taplow, Frank Hunter
Related Symbols: The Agamemnon
Page Number and Citation: 34
Explanation and Analysis:
With Frank back in the room, Andrew translates Taplow’s inscription written in the fly-leaf of Taplow’s gift. The quote is from The Agamemnon itself, showing Taplow’s engagement with the text. Moreover, it is written in perfect Greek, showing that Taplow represents a small success in Andrew’s teaching. The quote moves Andrew deeply in part because he is an especially fragile emotional state, brought on by his attempt to hold all feelings at bay. But most importantly Taplow’s chosen quote shows a remarkable sensitivity towards Andrew’s life, suggesting that Taplow empathizes with Andrew and wishes to show that he believes his Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut ven

Pause. MILLIE laughs suddenly.

MILLIE: The artful little beast –

FRANK: (Urgently.) Millie –

ANDREW: Artful? Why artful?

MILLIE looks at FRANK who is staring meaningly at her.

Why artful, Millie?

MILLIE laughs again, quite lightly, and turns from FRANK to ANDREW.

MILLIE: My dear, because I came into this room this afternoon to find him giving an imitation of you to Frank here. Obviously he was scared stiff I was going to tell you, and you’d ditch his remove or something. I don't blame him for trying a few bobs’ worth of appeasement.

Related Characters: Millie Crocker-Harris (speaker), Frank Hunter (speaker), Andrew Crocker-Harris (speaker), John Taplow
Related Symbols: The Agamemnon
Page Number and Citation: 35
Explanation and Analysis:
After Taplow has said his goodbyes to Andrew, Millie comes back into the room. Frank tells her about Taplow’s gift. Not wishing her husband even a fleeting moment’s happiness, Millie gleefully undermines Taplow’s intentions in an attempt to restore Andrew’s bleak outlook on life. Taplow’s gift represents the one great act of kindness Andrew receives in his final days at the school—not even the headmaster treats Andrew well—and accordingly to undermine Taplow’s act is to deny Andrew any momentary redemption from the feeling that his life is one great failure. The added information about Taplow’s impersonation, though true, is a Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. O

FRANK: (With a note of real repulsion in his voice.) Millie! My God! How could you?

MILLIE: Well, why not? Why should he be allowed his comforting little illusions? I’m not.

Related Characters: Frank Hunter (speaker), Millie Crocker-Harris (speaker), Andrew Crocker-Harris
Page Number and Citation: 36
Explanation and Analysis:
With the play nearing its conclusion, Frank is genuinely shocked at Millie’s cruel treatment of Andrew. Given that he is having an affair and thereby committing his own wrong against Andrew, his sense of disgust towards Millie shows how clearly deliberate she is in her efforts to hurt Andrew’s feelings. Millie’s attitude is deeply cynical and the product of years of growing resentment between her and her husband. Their marriage has come to exist as one “little illusion”—albeit not a comforting one—and she feels that she has to prevent Andrew from gaining any potentially uplifting perspective on life. Such a Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam

ANDREW: You see, my dear Hunter, she is really quite as much to be pitied as I. We are both of us interesting subjects for your microscope. Both of us needing from the other something that would make life supportable for us, and neither of us able to give it. Two kinds of love. Hers and mine. Worlds apart, as I know now, though when I married her I didn’t think they were incompatible. In those days I hadn’t thought that her kind of love – the love she requires and which I was unable to give her – was so important that its absence would drive out the other kind of love – the kind of love that I require and which I thought, in my folly, was by far the greater part of love. I may have been, you see, Hunter, a brilliant classical scholar, but I was woefully ignorant of the facts of life. I know better now, of course. I know that in both of us, the love that we should have borne each other has turned to bitter hatred. That's all the problem is. Not a very unusual one, I venture to think – nor nearly as tragic as you seem to imagine. Merely the problem of an unsatisfied wife and a henpecked husband. You’ll find it all over the world. It is usually, I believe, a subject for farce. And now, if you have to leave us, my dear fellow, please don’t let me detain you any longer.

Related Characters: Andrew Crocker-Harris (speaker), Frank Hunter, Millie Crocker-Harris
Page Number and Citation: 42
Explanation and Analysis:
As the play nears its end, Andrew demonstrates the effect that Taplow’s gift has had on him. It has awakened his inner emotional sense and empowered him to talk more openly about how his life has turned out. Of course, he can’t be expected to have undergone an instant personality transformation, but this exchange is markedly different from the earlier niceties between him and Frank at the start of the play. Andrew uses a metaphor related to Frank’s teaching subject, science, to show that he is willing to look at his life in more detail, instead of trying to ignore Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dol

ANDREW: If you think, by this expression of kindness, Hunter, that you can get me to repeat the shameful exhibition of emotion I made to Taplow a moment ago, I must tell you that you have no chance. My hysteria over that book just now was no more than a sort of reflex action of the spirit. The muscular twitchings of a corpse. It can never happen again.

FRANK: A corpse can be revived.

ANDREW: I don’t believe in miracles.

FRANK: Don’t you? Funnily enough, as a scientist, I do.

ANDREW: Your faith would be touching, if I were capable of being touched by it.

Related Characters: Frank Hunter (speaker), Andrew Crocker-Harris (speaker), John Taplow
Page Number and Citation: 43
Explanation and Analysis:
By the end of the play, Frank’s sympathies are firmly with Andrew, having fully rejected Millie and her cruelty. Sensing the possibility of redemption for Andrew shown by the latter’s open and unflinching discussion of his own life, Frank wants to convince Andrew that all is not lost—that there is still meaning and value in a life lived with emotion and honesty. Of course, there is an irony at play here in Frank’s statement that a corpse can be brought back to life. Though Andrew typically tries to disguise his emotion once more, his admission that Frank’s comment would be Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non.

MILLIE: He’s coming to Bradford. He’s not going to you.

ANDREW: The likeliest contingency is, that he’s not going to either of us. Shall we have dinner?

MILLIE: He’s coming to Bradford.

ANDREW: I expect so. Oh, by the way, I’m not. I shall be staying here until I go to Dorset.

MILLIE: (Indifferently.) Suit yourself – what makes you think I’ll join you there?

ANDREW: I don’t.

MILLIE: You needn’t expect me.

ANDREW: I don’t think either of us has the right to expect anything further from the other.

Related Characters: Andrew Crocker-Harris (speaker), Millie Crocker-Harris (speaker), Frank Hunter
Page Number and Citation: 44-45
Explanation and Analysis:
These lines contain Andrew and Millie’s final exchange in the play and, in all likelihood, reveal the end of their marriage. The bitter married couple find themselves in the odd situation of discussing which one of them Frank will decide to visit in the coming months (Frank himself insists it will be Andrew and that his relationship with Millie is over). Andrew’s final comment to Millie is stark and unflinching, but ultimately indicative of his newfound—or perhaps reawakened—ability to deal with life honestly. The sentiment rings true: the audience can see that this marriage is past the point of saving Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores

ANDREW: Oh, by the way, headmaster. I have changed my mind about the prize–giving ceremony. I intend to speak after, instead of before, Fletcher, as is my privilege . . . Yes, I quite understand, but I am now seeing the matter in a different light . . . I know, but I am of opinion that occasionally an anti–climax can be surprisingly effective. Goodbye.

(He rings off and goes and sits at table.)

Come along, my dear. We mustn’t let our dinner get cold.

Related Characters: Andrew Crocker-Harris (speaker), Dr. Frobisher
Page Number and Citation: 45
Explanation and Analysis:
These are the final words of the play and represent a quiet triumph for Andrew. Whereas earlier he had meekly accepted Dr. Frobisher’s desire to switch the order of speakers at the school assembly, swapping Andrew out of the headline slot in favor of a more popular teacher, Andrew now decides to insist on what he knows is rightfully his. Though subtly drawn, this attitude is markedly different from his earlier reluctance to speak up for himself. Though readers can’t hear Dr. Frobisher’s end of the conversation, Andrew’s repeated insistences on speaking last show that the headteacher evidently tries to Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperi
No matches.