The Color of Law

The Color of Law

by

Richard Rothstein

Teachers and parents! Our Teacher Edition on The Color of Law makes teaching easy.
A law passed by President Johnson’s administration as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, which prohibits both explicit housing discrimination and any government housing programs with “disparate impacts” on different racial groups. Because it was the first time that “government endorsed the rights of African Americans to reside wherever they chose and could afford,” Rothstein explains, the Fair Housing Act has played a crucial part in legal battles aimed at stopping and reversing segregation, and the Act essentially marks the end of the era during which government openly and explicitly pushed for segregation. But this does not mean that racial residential discrimination and de jure segregation have stopped: although the Fair Housing Act clearly banned practices like redlining, restrictive covenants, and racist mob violence intended to prevent integration, it has seldom been enforced. Moreover, since the Fair Housing Act’s passage, housing has grown more and more expensive relative to wages in the United States, to the point that since the Fair Housing Act, “unaffordability” is a greater barrier to African American homeownership than outright discrimination.

Fair Housing Act Quotes in The Color of Law

The The Color of Law quotes below are all either spoken by Fair Housing Act or refer to Fair Housing Act. For each quote, you can also see the other terms and themes related to it (each theme is indicated by its own dot and icon, like this one:
De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation Theme Icon
).
Chapter 7 Quotes

The consequences of racially targeted subprime lending continue to accumulate. As the housing bubble collapsed, African American homeownership rates fell much more than white rates. Families no longer qualify for conventional mortgages if they previously defaulted when they were unable to make exorbitant loan payments; for these families, the contract buying system of the 1960s is now making its return. Some of the same firms that exploited African Americans in the subprime crisis are now reselling foreclosed properties to low- and moderate-income households at high interest rates, with high down payments, with no equity accumulated until the contract period has ended, and with eviction possible after a single missed payment.

Related Characters: Richard Rothstein (speaker)
Related Symbols: Homeownership
Page Number: 113
Explanation and Analysis:
Chapter 11 Quotes

As it has turned out, schools are more segregated today than they were forty years ago, but this is mostly because the neighborhoods in which schools are located are so segregated. In 1970, the typical African American student attended a school in which 32 percent of the students were white. By 2010, this exposure had fallen to 29 percent. It is because of neighborhood segregation that African American students are more segregated in schools in states like New York and Illinois than they are anywhere else. Throughout the country, not just in the South, busing of school-children was almost the only tool available to create integrated schools—because few children lived near enough to opposite-race peers for any other approach to be feasible. Were housing segregation not pervasive, school desegregation would have been more successful.

Yet unlike the progress we anticipated from other civil rights laws, we shouldn’t have expected much to happen from a Fair Housing Act that allowed African Americans now to resettle in a white suburb. Moving from an urban apartment to a suburban home is incomparably more difficult than registering to vote, applying for a job, changing seats on a bus, sitting down in a restaurant, or even attending a neighborhood school.

Related Characters: Richard Rothstein (speaker)
Related Symbols: Homeownership
Page Number: 179
Explanation and Analysis:

The Fair Housing Act of 1968 prohibited future discrimination, but it was not primarily discrimination (although this still contributed) that kept African Americans out of most white suburbs after the law was passed. It was primarily unaffordability. The right that was unconstitutionally denied to African Americans in the late 1940s cannot be restored by passing a Fair Housing law that tells their descendants they can now buy homes in the suburbs, if only they can afford it. The advantage that FHA and VA loans gave the white lower-middle class in the 1940s and ‘50s has become permanent.

Related Characters: Richard Rothstein (speaker)
Related Symbols: Homeownership
Page Number: 183
Explanation and Analysis:
Get the entire The Color of Law LitChart as a printable PDF.
The Color of Law PDF

Fair Housing Act Term Timeline in The Color of Law

The timeline below shows where the term Fair Housing Act appears in The Color of Law. The colored dots and icons indicate which themes are associated with that appearance.
Preface
De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation Theme Icon
Segregation and the Preservation of Racial Caste Theme Icon
Separation of Powers, Legal Activism, and Minority Rights Theme Icon
...the Supreme Court changed its mind and endorsed this new interpretation in 1968, although the Fair Housing Act had just been passed by President Lyndon Johnson’s government and became the main basis for... (full context)
Chapter 9: State-Sanctioned Violence
De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation Theme Icon
Although federally outlawed by the Fair Housing Act in 1968, arson and mob attacks remained common through the 1980s, and were only frequently... (full context)
Chapter 11: Looking Forward, Looking Back
De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation Theme Icon
Separation of Powers, Legal Activism, and Minority Rights Theme Icon
...Through an executive order, President Kennedy ended federal support for discriminatory home financing, and the Fair Housing Act passed in 1968 “by the narrowest of margins,” meaning that for the first time, “government... (full context)
De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation Theme Icon
Segregation and the Preservation of Racial Caste Theme Icon
Racism, Profit, and Political Gain Theme Icon
...white people earn much more from the appreciation in their homes’ value, and after the Fair Housing Act of 1968, “unaffordability” was more important than discrimination in preventing African American people from moving... (full context)
De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation Theme Icon
Segregation and the Preservation of Racial Caste Theme Icon
Racism, Profit, and Political Gain Theme Icon
Separation of Powers, Legal Activism, and Minority Rights Theme Icon
...that such “disparate impacts” have continued adversely affecting African American people even long after the Fair Housing Act outlawed housing-related programs with disparate impacts. One example is the overinvestment in highways at the... (full context)
Chapter 12: Considering Fixes
De Jure vs. De Facto Segregation Theme Icon
Separation of Powers, Legal Activism, and Minority Rights Theme Icon
...this final chapter, Rothstein notes that President Barack Obama’s administration planned to truly enforce the Fair Housing Act ’s mandate that local governments “‘affirmatively further’ the purposes of the law.” But the government... (full context)