The Idiot

The Idiot

by

Fyodor Dostoevsky

Teachers and parents! Our Teacher Edition on The Idiot makes teaching easy.

The Idiot: Part Four, Chapter Five Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
When Varya told Ganya about Myshkin’s engagement to Aglaya, she exaggerated the extent to which it was actually confirmed. In reality, the information she received from the Epanchin sisters has come in the form of vague hints and allusions. When the Epanchins gradually came to realize that Aglaya perhaps loved the prince, General Epanchin was surprised, but kept an open mind. He pointed out that Myshkin “is a wonderful fellow,” with a noble name and some money. Mrs. Epanchin, however, was furious. She called Myshkin a “sick idiot,” a “fool,” and an “unpardonable democrat,” panicking at the idea of what their friends would think of the patch.
The fact that Mrs. Epanchin, who otherwise loves Myshkin so much that she treats him like her own son, switches in her attitude toward him so quickly demonstrates the disproportionate extent to which she cares about other people’s opinions. As long as Myshkin is her personal friend she is happy to be extremely close with him. However, the idea of her family having a formal, public connection to him through marriage is abhorrent to her.
Themes
Innocence v. Foolishness Theme Icon
Social Hierarchy, Authority, and Rebellion Theme Icon
Alexandra and Adelaida, meanwhile, support the idea of Aglaya marrying Myshkin. Mrs. Epanchin blames their open-mindedness on the “cursed woman question.” She goes to see Kammeny Island in St. Petersburg to see Princess Belokonsky, who is Aglaya’s godmother. Belokonsky, who considers Mrs. Epanchin her inferior and “protégé,” is not moved by Lizaveta’s fears. She tells Mrs. Epanchin that she is having an overly dramatic reaction and that nothing is decided yet. Returning to Pavlovsk, Mrs. Epanchin attempts to calm down, with little success. She asks what happened when she was gone, and Alexandra and Adelaida say that Myshkin came over and played the card game “fools” with Aglaya.
Mrs. Epanchin clearly uses the “woman question” as a scapegoat through which to explain all the clashes of opinion she has with her daughters. At the same time, there may be some truth in her instinct to blame her daughters’ differing opinions on a form of early feminism. Adelaida and Alexandra can see that Aglaya loves Myshkin, and they decide that this is more important than Aglaya pleasing her mother or having a match that makes the family look good to the rest of the world.
Themes
Innocence v. Foolishness Theme Icon
Social Hierarchy, Authority, and Rebellion Theme Icon
The sisters explain that Myshkin turned out to be an excellent player of the game. Although Aglaya cheated, she still could not beat him. She became rude, then furious, and stormed out of the room. With tears still in her eyes, she came back down again when Kolya arrived holding a hedgehog he had just bought from a peasant. Aglaya begged Kolya to sell her the hedgehog and he eventually conceded, although it turned out that the hedgehog in fact never belonged to him in the first place but to another schoolboy. Aglaya asked Kolya to bring Myshkin the hedgehog as “a token of her profoundest respect.” Mrs. Epanchin is alarmed by this story and struggles to understand what it all means.
During this part of the novel, Aglaya is behaving more and more like a child, as encapsulated by the hedgehog saga. Of course, Myshkin himself has repeatedly been characterized as a child and a friend to children. At the same time, it is unclear whether this makes them a good match. Moreover, Myshkin’s childlike nature is based in the fact that he is a totally pure and innocent person, whereas Aglaya has more of the bad qualities of children, such as irrational stubbornness.  
Themes
Innocence v. Foolishness Theme Icon
Social Hierarchy, Authority, and Rebellion Theme Icon
In reality, when Kolya presented the hedgehog to Myshkin, the prince immediately switched from a state of utmost misery to carefree joy. Kolya assured Myshkin that Aglaya was in love with him, and Myshkin blushed. Mrs. Epanchin, meanwhile, “succumb[s] to a hysterical moment” and goes to lie in bed. When Myshkin arrives at the Epanchins’ dacha that evening, he is disturbed to see that Aglaya isn’t there. Myshkin chats nervously, knowing he is making a fool of herself. When Aglaya finally enters the room, she is sullen. She demands to know if Myshkin received the hedgehog and what he believes to be the meaning of it. Myshkin stammers, and Aglaya then asks if he is proposing to her. 
This passage reveals that Varya was wrong: Myshkin and Aglaya were not actually engaged. Instead, the idea seemed to have entered people’s heads without having taken place in reality. This further emphasizes the sense that Myshkin and Aglaya are like children who are pretending at having a courtship and engagement. It’s possible that, due to their innocence and naïveté, they might be incapable of pulling off the real thing.
Themes
Innocence v. Foolishness Theme Icon
Get the entire The Idiot LitChart as a printable PDF.
The Idiot PDF
Nervously, Myshkin says that he hasn’t formally proposed to her, but that he loves her. Following further prompting from Aglaya, he clarifies that he is asking to marry her, and “commotion” ensues. Mrs. Epanchin cries out in protest, but Aglaya shushes her. She asks Myshkin how he plans to make her happy. Myshkin doesn’t reply, other than to say that he loves her. Aglaya then asks how much money he has (to cries of despair from members of her family). Myshkin replies that he has 125,000 roubles. Aglaya continues to interrogate him until her sisters suddenly burst out laughing, at which she laughs too, in an “almost hysterical” manner. Suddenly, she flees the room, and her mother and sisters run after her.
Aglaya appears to be trying to assert herself and take control of the situation like an adult, but she cannot sustain it. Her love for Myshkin, while seemingly very intense, does not encourage her to treat him kindly or reasonably. Instead, it provokes her to act in very strange, almost nonsensical ways. As the two get closer and the possibility of their marriage becomes imminent, Aglaya’s behavior gets stranger and stranger.
Themes
Innocence v. Foolishness Theme Icon
Money, Greed, and Corruption Theme Icon
Social Hierarchy, Authority, and Rebellion Theme Icon
Absurdity and Nihilism Theme Icon
Alone with Myshkin, General Epanchin asks him to explain. Myshkin replies that he loves Aglaya deeply and has done for a long time. The Epanchin women call out for the general, and he goes to find them embracing and crying happy tears. Aglaya says she doesn’t love Myshkin, and that she now intends to apologize to him, but must do so alone. Going back, she asks for his forgiveness for her commitment to “an absurdity” which will ultimately amount to nothing. The other Epanchins come in at this point and look on nervously. Yet, for some reason, Myshkin seems incredibly happy, and spends the rest of the evening in a joyous mood.
Here, it appears as though Aglaya’s strange behavior is not caused by her love for Myshkin alone, but rather her intensely conflicted feelings about him. Her behavior generally suggests that her claim not to love Myshkin cannot be true, but at the same time, she is also clearly very hesitant and concerned about the possibility of marrying him.
Themes
Innocence v. Foolishness Theme Icon
Social Hierarchy, Authority, and Rebellion Theme Icon
Myshkin is unusually lively that evening, talking at length about serious issues as well as telling amusing stories. Aglaya listens to him and barely speaks at all. Later, Mrs. Epanchin laments that it is clear Aglaya is completely in love with him. The next day Aglaya fights with Myshkin again and mocks him. She tells him he is “terribly uneducated.” When Prince Shch. returns to Pavlovsk shortly later, he drops hints about (what he believes is) Aglaya’s engagement to Myshkin, which enrages her. She declares that she doesn’t plan on “replacing anyone’s mistresses.” Speaking alone with her husband, Mrs. Epanchin insists that they discuss Nastasya with Myshkin, although General Epanchin points out that everyone knows Nastasya is going to marry Rogozhin.
Finally, after such a long period of mysterious back-and-forth behavior from Aglaya, it becomes clear in this passage that her resistance to marrying Myshkin has nothing to do with her mother’s disapproval, but rather her jealousy about Nastasya. Meanwhile, Myshkin’s happiness and apparent relief after hearing that Aglaya doesn’t want to marry him suggests that perhaps Aglaya has the right to worry.
Themes
Innocence v. Foolishness Theme Icon
Social Hierarchy, Authority, and Rebellion Theme Icon
Later, Myshkin runs into Ippolit by chance in the park. Ippolit points out that he was correct back when he said that Myshkin was in love. He then complains about the Epanchins, calling them “vain,” “egoistic,” and “ordinary.” Ippolit asks if Myshkin hates him for not being worthy enough to suffer as he does. He then rants about Ganya, objecting to Ganya’s claim that Ippolit’s dramatic confession was all an act of ego. They briefly discuss historical figures who were tortured and executed by the state. Ippolit observes that Myshkin is “a perfect child,” and goes to leave. He asks Myshkin how he should die, and Myshkin says that Ippolit should “forgive us our happiness.”
There is an important parallel in what Myshkin and Ippolit express to each other in this passage. In asking if Myshkin thinks he is worthy of suffering, Ippolit references the Christian idea that suffering can make a person noble. (Clearly, this hasn’t happened in Ippolit’s case—at least certainly not in the traditional Christian sense.) Meanwhile, Myshkin poses a kind of converse question to Ippolit, asking if Ippolit is able to forgive those who will survive him and not suffer.
Themes
Innocence v. Foolishness Theme Icon
Money, Greed, and Corruption Theme Icon
Social Hierarchy, Authority, and Rebellion Theme Icon
Absurdity and Nihilism Theme Icon
Passion, Violence, and Christianity Theme Icon