The Phantom of the Opera
by Gaston Leroux

The Natural vs. the Supernatural Theme Analysis

Themes and Colors
The Natural vs. the Supernatural Theme Icon
Love vs. Jealousy Theme Icon
Violence, Revenge, and Redemption Theme Icon
Beauty vs. Ugliness Theme Icon
LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in The Phantom of the Opera, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
The Natural vs. the Supernatural Theme Icon
The Natural vs. the Supernatural Theme Icon

Gaston Leroux’s 1910 novel, The Phantom of the Opera, follows a series of mysterious events that took place at the Paris Opera House in the 1880s and were popularly attributed to the actions of a ghost. As the narrator investigates occurrences such as the death of chief stage machinist Joseph Buquet and the musical transformation of young Swedish soprano Christine Daaé, he uncovers a surprising truth: these strange events do derive from the actions of a mysterious being known as the “Phantom,” but this person is a human being named Erik, not an immaterial ghost. While the novel concludes that the bizarre occurrences at the Opera can be explained rationally—as they are the result of Erik’s tricks—it also becomes clear that Erik is no ordinary human being. Instead, Erik is characterized by extraordinary singing abilities and a corpse-like, monstrous appearance. Therefore, although the novel embraces logical analysis, it does not completely renounce the supernatural: seemingly unexplainable events are ultimately explained rationally as the consequences of Erik’s actions, yet Erik’s very existence requires accepting his fantastical nature as a “living corpse.”

Although certain characters deny the existence of the Opera ghost, it soon becomes clear that the strange phenomena taking place at the Paris Opera House cannot be explained in ordinary ways. Following the narrator’s investigations, the reader is encouraged to believe in the existence of a mysterious Phantom. The narrator insists that the events taking place at the Opera are highly unusual and should not be treated in a routine manner. The death of Joseph Buquet, the chief stage machinist, remains particularly mysterious; although the police concludes that Buquet hanged himself, committing “suicide under natural circumstances,” when people approach to release Buquet, they are unable to find the rope that he supposedly used. The narrator ironically notes that the disappearance of a hanged man’s rope can hardly be called “natural circumstances”—and, therefore, that the true circumstances surrounding Buquet’s death seem to defy logic and remain unexplained.

A second phenomenon, Swedish soprano Christine Daaé’s transformation from an unremarkable singer to an extraordinary performer, is also tinged with mystery. After the performance, her childhood friend Raoul de Chagny overhears her talking to a man, saying that she has given him her soul, and that she sings only for him. Once the door to the dressing-room opens, however, Raoul notices that Christine is alone. Christine later tells Raoul that she has been visited by “the Angel of Music,” who gives her private music lessons. These circumstances suggest that Christine might be interacting with an invisible, supernatural being, perhaps the same one who haunts the Opera. The literary environment in which Christine and Raoul grew up in Brittany, France, provide context for Christine’s claims about the Angel of Music. As children, the two friends spent most of their time learning about Breton legends. The story of Little Lotte, who is visited every night by the Angel of Music, remains so deeply impressed in Christine’s mind that she later argues “that all great musicians, all great performers were visited by the Angel of Music at least once in their lives.” These fairytales give credibility to Christine’s seemingly implausible assertions about the “Angel of Music,” and encourage the reader to entertain the possibility of a supernatural explanation for the mysteries that punctuate the Opera.

As the narrator’s investigation continues, the reader discovers that, although a figure known as the “Phantom” or “Angel of Music” does in fact exist, he is not a ghost but a human being capable of particularly ingenious tricks. The strange events taking place at the Opera might seem mysterious, but they can ultimately be explained rationally as the human “Phantom” Erik’s tricks. Both Christine and a mysterious opera-goer, the Persian, confirm to Raoul that the Opera Ghost is nothing but a human being named Erik. Erik’s ability to move from one area of the building to another without being seen can be explained by an ingenious system of traps, which he has installed throughout the Opera. These traps and secret passageways allow Erik to move across floors and behind walls, invisible to others, as though he were an immaterial being. His talent for ventriloquism also allows him to pretend that his voice is everywhere at once, seemingly severed from a human body. Finally, it is his use of elaborate killing techniques (itself the legacy of Erik’s past life as an assassin) that allows him to kill Joseph Buquet with a special rope, making the man’s murder appear as suicide. As the novel goes on, the seemingly supernatural events begin to unravel, suggesting to readers that logic reigns supreme after all.

However, despite the novel’s focus on rationality, certain aspects of Erik’s character remain elusive, seemingly beyond ordinary human capacity. Although the narrator insists that Erik existed “in flesh and blood,” Christine argues that “what [Erik] does, no other man could do; and what he knows is unknown to the living world.” This paradoxical characterization is central to the Phantom’s existence. Indeed, although readers discover that Erik is a human being, some of his characteristics are not purely human: he has a corpse-like appearance (his skull is covered in rotting flesh) and can sing more enchantingly than any other human being. It remains ambiguous whether Erik’s voice and body are truly super-human, or whether he simply suffers from a congenital deformity and has a particularly beautiful voice. The novel never makes this distinction explicit, allowing for Erik to be seen alternately as a human and as a quasi-celestial being. This mystery of Erik’s true nature gives the tale its fantastic quality. Although many events at the Opera are ultimately explained in terms of logic and rationality, the puzzle of Erik’s existence separates this tale from ordinary mystery novels, adding an element of the fantastic to a multilayered story of murder, kidnapping, and musical talent.

Related Themes from Other Texts
Compare and contrast themes from other texts to this theme…

The Natural vs. the Supernatural ThemeTracker

The ThemeTracker below shows where, and to what degree, the theme of The Natural vs. the Supernatural appears in each chapter of The Phantom of the Opera. Click or tap on any chapter to read its Summary & Analysis.
How often theme appears:
chapter length:
Get the entire The Phantom of the Opera LitChart as a printable PDF.
"My students can't get enough of your charts and their results have gone through the roof." -Graham S.
The Phantom of the Opera PDF

The Natural vs. the Supernatural Quotes in The Phantom of the Opera

Below you will find the important quotes in The Phantom of the Opera related to the theme of The Natural vs. the Supernatural.

Prologue Quotes

The Phantom of the Opera did exist. He was not, as was long believed, born out of the fertile imagination of the artists, the credulity of the directors, or the ludicrous fancy and overexcited brains of the young ladies of the corps de ballet, their mothers, the ushers, the cloakroom attendants and the concierge. Yes, he did exist in flesh and blood, although he assumed in every respect the appearance of a ghost – that is, of a shadow.

Related Characters: Erik / The Phantom of the Opera / The Ghost / The Voice
Page Number and Citation: 5
Explanation and Analysis:
Theses opening lines of The Phantom of the Opera serve a crucial role: to present the story that the narrator is about to relate as a factual, credible tale. By mentioning people’s tendency to believe fanciful tales and give in to paranoia, the narrator distances himself from such a phenomenon, thus signaling that his conclusion—that the Phantom exists—relies not on rumor or naïveté but on concrete facts. The narrator’s comment that the Phantom existed “in flesh and blood” signals that the Phantom was not a ghost but a human being. However, the narrator never says so explicitly. In fact, despite Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis

Chapter 1 Quotes

When he did not actually show himself, he signaled his presence or his passage with disastrous or comic occurrences for which he was more often than not blamed, so rife were the feelings of superstition. Had there been some accident, had one of the girls been the butt of a practical joke by a friend, or lost a powder-puff, the culprit must be the ghost, the Phantom of the Opera!

Related Characters: Erik / The Phantom of the Opera / The Ghost / The Voice
Page Number and Citation: 12
Explanation and Analysis:
At the beginning of the novel, the narrator describes the ballerinas’ terror after seeing a dark, skeletal figure they assume to be the ghost. The narrator notes that the girls’ reaction is typical of the atmosphere at the Opera, where people have become so obsessed with the ghost that they tend to see him everywhere, assuming that any strange occurrence might be his doing. Even though members of the Opera might exaggerate the ghost’s presence, their understanding of the Phantom as a prankster is at least partially correct. Although the Phantom takes part in violent acts to defend his livelihood Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia e

“He is extraordinarily thin and his black coat hangs loosely off his skeletal frame. His eyes are so deep-set that you cannot make out his pupils: all you can see are two big black holes, as in a skull. His skin is stretched over his bone structure like a drumhead, and is not white but an ugly yellow. His nose is almost non-existent when seen sideways; and this absence is a horrible thing to behold. As for his hair, it consists of no more than three or four long dark strands on his forehead and behind his ears.”

Related Characters: Joseph Buquet (speaker), Erik / The Phantom of the Opera / The Ghost / The Voice, Papin
Related Symbols: Masks
Related Literary Devices:
Page Number and Citation: 13
Explanation and Analysis:
Joseph Buquet is one of the early witnesses to describe the Phantom of the Opera’s appearance. Although his testimony differs from that of Papin, the fireman, it is later proven to be a correct depiction of Erik’s body. Buquet’s description is particularly terrifying not only because it portrays a body at the limit between life and death, incomparable with any other human face, but also because Buquet has not fallen prey to the general paranoia at the Opera. Rather, the narrator describes Buquet as a serious, practical man, unlikely to let his imagination roam. Therefore, his testimony is particularly credible Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia

Chapter 6 Quotes

Some claimed that it was a mark of immeasurable pride; others spoke of her saint-like modesty. Yet, as a rule, artists are rarely so modest; in truth I am rather tempted to ascribe her actions to sheer dread. Yes, I believe that Christine Daaé was frightened by what had just happened to her, and was as taken aback by it as everybody else around her. […] To suggest that Christine was taken aback or even frightened by her triumph is in fact an understatement: having reread the letter, I would say that she was terrified. Yes, yes, terrified. “I am no longer myself when I sing,” she wrote.

Related Characters: Christine Daaé (speaker), Erik / The Phantom of the Opera / The Ghost / The Voice, Carlotta
Related Symbols: The Ring
Page Number and Citation: 56
Explanation and Analysis:
After Christine’s extraordinary gala performance, which impresses all critics and members of the public, Christine disappears. Without giving any explanation, she refuses to sing in public again. The narrator’s conclusion that Christine’s behavior derives from fear highlights the supernatural quality of what has happened to her: the visits from Erik (whom she believes to be the Angel of Music) and his capacity to make her sing beautifully. Christine’s lack of control over her own voice suggests that Erik might have the power to control other people’s singing—as he perhaps does later with Carlotta, when he causes her to croak in Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Elig

The Angel was never seen but could be heard by those who were meant to hear. This often happened when you least expected it, when you were sad and down-hearted. Then your ears would suddenly hear celestial harmonies, a divine voice, which you would remember for ever. Those who had been visited by the Angel were stirred. They experienced a thrill unknown to other mortals and henceforth could not touch an instrument or open their mouths to sing without producing sounds that put all other musicians to shame. The people who knew nothing about the angelic visitation called them geniuses.

Related Characters: Erik / The Phantom of the Opera / The Ghost / The Voice, Christine Daaé, Christine’s Father
Related Literary Devices:
Page Number and Citation: 60
Explanation and Analysis:
The narrator recounts the story of Little Lotte and the Angel of Music, a fairytale Christine’s father used to tell her when she was a child. This story leads her to believe, upon first hearing Erik’s voice address her in the Opera, that Erik must be the Angel of Music, visiting her upon her father’s request. The description of the Angel of Music in fact blends two separate ideas: the possibility of musical inspiration, which allows artists to compose works with beauty and exhilaration, and the more fanciful idea that this inspiration is personified by an actual person, an Angel. Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laborios

“As I would not let go of the cloak, the shadow turned round and beneath the hood I saw a terrifying skull, whose staring eyes burned with the fire of Hell. I thought I was face to face with Satan himself. It was like a vision from beyond the grave.”

Related Characters: Viscount Raoul de Chagny (speaker), Christine Daaé, Erik / The Phantom of the Opera / The Ghost / The Voice
Related Symbols: Masks
Page Number and Citation: 60
Explanation and Analysis:
One night in Perros-Guirec, the village where Christine and Raoul used to meet as children, Raoul follows Christine into the cemetery, where she stands before her father’s grave while someone, hidden in the darkness, plays a mournful song on a violin. Raoul attempts to confront the mysterious man who is responsible for this music, and realizes that it is not an ordinary human being but a terrifying, skeletal figure. Raoul’s vision confirms other people’s descriptions of the Phantom, thus confirming that the Phantom does exist, but also associates the Phantom with pure evil. Raoul’s reaction is not only horror and Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis con

Chapter 9 Quotes

To think that he had believed in her innocence, in her purity! That he had tried for a moment to explain everything by her naivety, her simplicity of mind and her extreme candour. The Spirit of Music! He knew him now! He saw him! Surely he was some minor singer at the Opera, some good-looking Lothario, some coxcomb all smiles and sweet talk. He felt ridiculous and pitiable. Ah, what a wretched, insignificant and foolish young man you are, Viscount de Chagny! he raged to himself. As for Christine, what a brazen, devilishly cunning creature!

Related Characters: Christine Daaé, Erik / The Phantom of the Opera / The Ghost / The Voice, Viscount Raoul de Chagny
Related Symbols: The Ring
Page Number and Citation: 98
Explanation and Analysis:
After Carlotta’s terrible croaking on stage, Christine disappears for a while. Trying to solve this mystery, Raoul visits Mme Valerius, who tells him that Christine is with “the Spirit of Music,” a mysterious being who has been giving Christine music lessons. When Raoul hears this, he becomes convinced that Mme Valerius is a delusional old lady. He assumes that Christine must have lied to her caregiver, inventing a fairytale to justify her clandestine relationship with a man. Raoul’s reaction, however, is contradictory. Part of his anger toward Mme Valerius derives from the influence he assumes her credulous attitude must have Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur