The Sculptor’s Funeral

by

Willa Cather

Teachers and parents! Our Teacher Edition on The Sculptor’s Funeral makes teaching easy.

Success, Money, and Materialism Theme Analysis

Themes and Colors
Artist vs. Society Theme Icon
Judgment Theme Icon
Success, Money, and Materialism Theme Icon
Homecoming Theme Icon
LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in The Sculptor’s Funeral, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
Success, Money, and Materialism Theme Icon

When Steavens, Harvey’s apprentice, first enters the childhood home of his late master, looking “for some mark of identification,” he can’t fathom that any of this home could belong to Harvey. Cather describes the sculptor’s childhood home as markedly materialistic and chintzy, displaying none of Harvey’s artwork. Like Harvey’s family, the inhabitants of Sand City, view money as the only real measure of success. Through the townspeople’s anecdotes about Harvey during his funeral, Cather posits the figure of the artist as fundamentally at odds with the rampant materialism present in parts of the Western United States in the early 20th century.

Cather uses vivid imagery throughout the story to illuminate the greed-fueled materialism driving Sand City, making it difficult for the townspeople to view success as anything but a synonym for wealth. While using an ostentatious “pearl-handled pocket-knife,” one of the two bankers, Phelps, laughs at the question of Harvey’s will. Even though the sculptor was a widely praised artist, the townspeople would always view his lack of material wealth as reason to slander him. Phelps’s outright dismissal that there could even be a will indicates the town’s inability to redefine their narrow notion of success to include great artistic fame. The irony here is that the townspeople clearly are in no position to judge the quality of Harvey’s character, let alone his success as an artist and how that success should present.

Harvey’s success as a sculptor is not diminished by his hometown’s inability to acknowledge his life’s work as an artist a success. The palm leaf on Harvey Merrick’s coffin symbolizes his achievement as an artist, regardless of what Sand City thinks of him. After listening to the town’s endless criticism of his master, Steavens is in disbelief that “the palm on the coffin meant nothing to them.” By forcing interpretation of the palm leaf, Cather assumes the reader will relate more with the educated elite of the East than the uncultured townsfolk of Sand City who are ignorant of the palm leaf’s significance. The palm leaf historically has been a symbol of achievement. Early Christians adopted it as a symbol of triumph over sin—use of the palm leaf on a tomb let other Christians know that a martyr was interred there. Cather invokes the traditional meaning of this symbol to confirm Harvey’s great accomplishment as an artist—an accomplishment untouchable even by the harshest repudiation by his hometown.

Even though Harvey’s success as a sculptor doesn’t align with the townspeople’s definition, he is still incredibly successful in his own right. Jim Laird’s tirade about the town confirms what the reader might have been suspecting—Harvey was much better off for having left Sand City. Staying behind, Jim became the “shyster,” or fraudulent lawyer, the townspeople wanted him to be to suit their needs, and while he was successful (perhaps even respected), he was miserable. Jim reminds the town that he wasn’t the only man they ruined, reproaching them about their behavior at past funerals, “[sitting] by the coffins of boys born and raised in this town; and, if I remember rightly, you were never too well satisfied when you checked them up.” After a series of rhetorical questions illuminating the fates of a few unfortunate boys who didn’t leave Sand City, Jim claims the reason for their downfall is that the town “drummed nothing but money and knavery into their ears from the time they wore knickerbockers.” Cather uses Laird’s diatribe against the townspeople to exemplify how a backwards town like Sand City can ruin a man’s potential entirely. Even though both Laird and Harvey had the intention of becoming “great men,” only Harvey was able to climb the “big, clean up-grade” and escape the town’s expectations. The other young men’s deaths at the hand of their vices—one who “[took] to drinking and forge[d] a check and shot himself” and another who was shot in a gambling house—indicate that the town’s greed rubbed off on them, which ultimately ruined their lives. Harvey’s commitment to his art, and thereby his own version of success, spared him a similar fate.

At a base level, the town and Harvey have drastically different values, especially regarding art, education, and what it means to be successful. The other banker in the parlor discusses how Harvey’s father mortgaged some of his farms to be able to afford Harvey’s continued education. Instead of viewing him as a father supporting his son’s passion, the townspeople view Harvey’s reliance on his father’s finances as a kind of filial betrayal. To the fictional people of Sand City, Kansas, there is no value to an arts- or humanities-focused education. Phelps claims, “Where the old man made his mistake was sending the boy East to school… What Harvey needed, of all people, was a course in some first-class Kansas City business college.” Not only does Phelps’ retelling give Mr. Merrick all the power over the trajectory of Harvey’s life, he argues that Harvey would have turned out better had he pursued a more practical education. They can’t comprehend the value of Harvey’s arts education, because they don’t see the utility of it in their own lives.

This narrow-minded, small-town stereotype creates a dichotomy of perceived intelligence between the Western U.S. and New England. Cather seems to be asserting a problematic view of the Western U.S. as plagued by money-grubbing philistines, while elevating the educated, cultured elite in the East. The Western frontier, which should be a place of prosperity, is portrayed as a corrupt wasteland when compared to the Eastern U.S., rich with its traditions and history. In “The Sculptor’s Funeral,” Cather posits art as the only true refuge from a materialistic, greedy world.

Related Themes from Other Texts
Compare and contrast themes from other texts to this theme…

Success, Money, and Materialism ThemeTracker

The ThemeTracker below shows where, and to what degree, the theme of Success, Money, and Materialism appears in each chapter of The Sculptor’s Funeral. Click or tap on any chapter to read its Summary & Analysis.
How often theme appears:
chapter length:
Get the entire The Sculptor’s Funeral LitChart as a printable PDF.
The Sculptor’s Funeral PDF

Success, Money, and Materialism Quotes in The Sculptor’s Funeral

Below you will find the important quotes in The Sculptor’s Funeral related to the theme of Success, Money, and Materialism.
The Sculptor’s Funeral Quotes

A number of lanky boys, of all ages, appeared as suddenly and slimily as eels wakened by the crack of thunder […] They straightened their stooping shoulders and lifted their heads, and a flash of momentary animation kindled in their dull eyes at that cold, vibrant scream, the world-wide call for men. It stirred them like the note of a trumpet; just as it had often stirred the man who was coming home tonight, in his boyhood.

Related Characters: Harvey Merrick
Page Number: 198
Explanation and Analysis:

The bearers carried the coffin along the narrow boards, while the undertaker ran ahead with the coffin-rests. They bore it into a large, unheated room that smelled of dampness and disuse and furniture polish, and set it down under a hanging lamp ornamented with jingling glass prisms and before a "Rogers group" of John Alden and Priscilla, wreathed with smilax. Henry Steavens stared about him with the sickening conviction that there had been some horrible mistake, and that he had somehow arrived at the wrong destination. He looked painfully about over the clover-green Brussels, the fat plush upholstery; among the hand-painted china plaques and panels and vases, for some mark of identification, for something that might once conceivably have belonged to Harvey Merrick. It was not until he recognized his friend in the crayon portrait of a little boy in kilts and curls, hanging above the piano, that he felt willing to let any of these people approach the coffin.

Related Characters: Harvey Merrick, Henry Steavens
Page Number: 200
Explanation and Analysis:

“Was he always a good deal of an oyster?” he asked abruptly. “He was terribly shy as a boy.”

“Yes, he was an oyster, since you put it so,” rejoined Steavens. “Although he could be very fond of people, he always gave one the impression of being detached. He disliked violent emotion; he was reflective and rather distrustful of himself—except, of course, as regarded his work. He was sure enough there. He distrusted men pretty thoroughly and women even more, yet somehow without believing ill of them. He was determined, indeed, to believe the best; but he seemed afraid to investigate.”

“A burnt dog dreads the fire,” said the lawyer grimly, and closed his eyes.

Related Characters: Henry Steavens (speaker), Jim Laird (speaker), Harvey Merrick
Related Literary Devices:
Page Number: 204
Explanation and Analysis:

Steavens understood now the real tragedy of his master’s life; neither love nor wine, as many had conjectured; but a blow which had fallen earlier and cut deeper than anything else could have done—a shame not his, and yet so unescapably his, to hide in his heart from his very boyhood. And without—the frontier warfare; the yearning of a boy, cast ashore upon a desert of newness and ugliness and sordidness, for all that is chastened and old, and noble with traditions.

Related Characters: Harvey Merrick, Henry Steavens
Related Literary Devices:
Page Number: 205
Explanation and Analysis:

Was it possible that these men did not understand, that the palm leaf on the coffin meant nothing to them? The very name of their town would have remained for ever buried in the postal guide had it not been now and again, mentioned in the world in connection with Harvey Merrick’s.

Related Characters: Harvey Merrick, Henry Steavens
Related Symbols: Palm Leaf
Page Number: 204
Explanation and Analysis:

He remembered what his master had said to him on the day of his death, after the congestion of both lungs had shut off any probability of recovery, and the sculptor had asked his pupil to send his body home. “It’s not a pleasant place to be lying while the world is moving and doing and bettering,” he had said with a feeble smile, “but it rather seems as though we ought to go back to the place we came from in the end. The townspeople will come in for a look at me; and after they have had their say, I shan’t have much to fear from the judgment of God!”

Related Characters: Harvey Merrick (speaker), Henry Steavens
Related Literary Devices:
Page Number: 207
Explanation and Analysis:

“[…] you all hated Harvey Merrick more for winning out than you hated all the other boys who got under the wheels. […] Phelps, here, is fond of saying that he could buy and sell us all out any time he’s a mind to; but he knew Harve wouldn’t have given a tinker’s damn for his bank and all his cattlefarms put together […]

Brother Elder says Harve was too free with the hold man’s money—fell short in filial consideration, maybe. Well, we can all remember the very tone in which brother Elder swore his own father was a liar, in the county court […]

Harvey Merrick and I […] were dead in earnest, and we wanted you all to be proud of us some day. We meant to be great men. […] I came back here to practice, and I found you didn’t in the least want me to be a great man. You wanted me to be a shrewd lawyer—oh yes! Our veteran here wanted me to get him an increase of pension, because he had dyspepsia; Phelps wanted a new county survey that would put the widow Wilson’s little bottom farm inside his south line […]”

Related Characters: Jim Laird (speaker), Harvey Merrick
Page Number: 208-209
Explanation and Analysis: