Minor Characters
Saint Beuve
Saint Beuve (1804–1869) was a French literary critic. Matthew Arnold uses the example of Saint Beuve’s conversation with Napoleon Bonaparte to introduce the idea that poetry is no place for charlatanism.
Napoleon Bonaparte
Napoleon Bonaparte (1769–1821) was Emperor of the French. Matthew Arnold writes of Napoleon in connection with Saint Beuve to demonstrate that, in contrast to politics, the realm of poetry does not welcome charlatans.
Charles d’Héricault
Charles d’Héricault (1823–1899) was a French literary critic. Matthew Arnold rejects d’Héricault’s idea that readers should strive to strip great poets of their deity-like status. On the contrary, Arnold argues, readers should appreciate the difference between the truly great poets and the others.
M. Vitet
Ludovic Vitet (1802–1873) was a French politician and literary critic. Matthew Arnold dismisses Vitet’s praise of the Song of Roland as excessive, an example of the fallacy of the historic estimate supplanting the real estimate of a poem.
John Dryden
John Dryden (1631–1700) was an English poet and literary critic. Matthew Arnold professes admiration for Dryden’s verse, which he praises as exemplary verse for the epoch of prose, before concluding that it falls short of the standard of classic poetry.
Alexander Pope
Alexander Pope (1688–1744) was an English poet. Like John Dryden, Pope is considered by Matthew Arnold to be an exemplary poet of the prose era, but not a truly great poet.
Thomas Gray
Thomas Gray (1716–1771) was an English poet. Matthew Arnold admits that Gray approaches the standard of the great poets, specifically because he models his verse so closely on theirs.
Percy Bysshe Shelley
Percy Bysshe Shelley (1792–1822) was an English poet of the Romantic era. Matthew Arnold mentions Shelley as an example of a poet who, being so close in time to Arnold’s present, was likely to be read under the influence of the personal estimate instead of the real estimate.
Lord Byron
Lord Byron (1788–1824) was an English poet of the Romantic era. Like Percy Bysshe Shelley and William Wordsworth, Lord Byron is considered too close to the present time (in Matthew Arnold’s day) to safely arrive at a real estimate of his poetry.