Previous
Maxims and Arrows
Themes
and Colors
Key
LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Twilight of the Idols, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
History and the Decline of Civilization
The Will to Power
The Ideal vs. The Real
Christianity and the “Revaluation of All Values”
Summary
Analysis
1. Throughout history, Nietzsche argues, the wisest people—even Socrates—have claimed that life is “worthless.” But what’s the point of this? Pessimistic followers of Schopenhauer claim that if people throughout the ages have decided that life is worthless, then it must be so. But Nietzsche disagrees.
From antiquity to modern era, philosophers have deemed life “worthless.” But Nietzsche rejects this view of the world. Also note that “pessimism” here doesn’t refer to a negative disposition, but to philosophical pessimism. The core idea of philosophical pessimism is that life itself holds a negative value.
Active
Themes
2. Nietzsche considers Socrates and Plato to be symbols of a fallen ancient Greece. In particular, Nietzsche takes issue with these thinkers’ value judgements. Nietzsche thinks that nothing, where life is concerned, can ever be proven “to be true,” since such judgments are meaningful “only as symptoms.” Nietzsche questions the wisdom of philosophers who think they can know “the value of life” absolutely.
Value judgements (assessing an idea or behavior’s worth according to a given moral framework) are bad because they assume that there is an objective, infallible way to judge anything. In reality, all moral frameworks are subjective and flawed, so all value judgements derived from them are equally flawed and flimsy. When Nietzsche calls value judgements “symptoms,” he's saying that value judgments are only symptoms of a person’s or moral authority’s personal values—not an indication of absolute, actual truth.
Active
Themes
3. Socrates came from a lower social class, and he was ugly, too. Anthropologists and criminologists state that criminals are often ugly, their ugly exteriors symptomatic of an ugly soul. Nietzsche describes criminals as “decadent.” Once, a foreigner who knew how to read faces passed by Socrates on the streets of Athens and told him his soul was full of “vice and lust,” and Socrates agreed with the assessment.
Active
Themes
4. It’s not just Socrates’s lustfulness that makes him decadent—it’s also his poor logic. Nietzsche strives to understand the origins of the Socratic equation “reason = virtue = happiness,” a formulation that Socrates’s predecessors would have abhorred.
Active
Themes
Get the entire Twilight of the Idols LitChart as a printable PDF.
"My students can't get enough of your charts and their results have gone through the roof." -Graham S.
5. Socrates brought dialectics—a method of intellectual investigation that draws on dialogue and discussion—to Greek philosophy. Nietzsche argues that this marks the end of “a nobler taste.” Before Socrates, society denounced dialectics as “bad manners,” distrusted those who believed in it, and thought dialecticians to be “buffoon[s].” So why did the Greeks take Socrates seriously?
Active
Themes
6. Nietzsche claims that dialectics are dubious and unconvincing, and that people only resort to them when they have no other options. They’re used by people who have to fight for their rights.
Active
Themes
7. Nietzsche wonders whether Socrates used dialectics as an act of “revenge” against the aristocrats. Dialectics allow the dialectician to be a tyrant, placing the onus on their opponent to prove their (the opponent’s) intelligence.
Active
Themes
8. Socrates fascinated his contemporaries. He created “a new kind of agon” and transformed the practice of wrestling in ancient Greece. He was also very “erotic.”
Active
Themes
9. Socrates saw through the veneer of aristocratic Athens. He recognized that anarchy and rebellion were in the air, and he knew that he could usher in a new age. Nietzsche recalls the story about Socrates and the face-reader from section three. In a time of social and political upheaval that saw human instinct as “antagonistic,” or a threat to law and order, how had Socrates managed to know himself?
Active
Themes
10. In order “to make a tyrant of reason,” as Socrates did, an opposing threat must also exist. Thus, Nietzsche suggests, Socrates convinced the Greeks that they and their culture would “perish” if they didn’t become “absurdly rational.” Nietzsche regards the “moralism” and subservience to dialectics of Greek philosophers from Plato onward as “pathologically conditioned.” All that “reason = virtue = happiness” means is that people should imitate Socrates instead of their own destructive instincts.
Active
Themes
11. Nietzsche explains the error of Socrates’s commitment to extreme rationality. He thinks that philosophers and moralists are fooling themselves if they think that condemning decadence allows them to avoid decadence. In reality, their disapproval of decadence is itself an act of decadence. Nietzsche thinks that Socrates—and “the entire morality of improvement,” which includes Christianity—is a “misunderstanding.”
Active
Themes
12. Had Socrates realized his self-deception? After all, he “handed himself the poison cup,” which Nietzsche takes as evidence that Socrates recognized his mistakes and wanted to die.
Active
Themes
