Twilight of the Idols
by Friedrich Nietzsche
✓

or to save your progress

Themes and Colors
History and the Decline of Civilization  Theme Icon
The Will to Power   Theme Icon
The Ideal vs. The Real  Theme Icon
Christianity and the “Revaluation of All Values”  Theme Icon
LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Twilight of the Idols, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
The Ideal vs. The Real  Theme Icon
The Ideal vs. The Real  Theme Icon

One of Nietzsche’s main gripes with past philosophers (and theologians) is that they rejected the notion of a real world and replaced it with the concept of the apparent world. Nietzsche argues that society embraces (and suffers from) this flawed logic to this day. In the section entitled “How the ‘Real World’ at last Became a Myth,” Nietzsche employs a series of maxims to summarize what he defines as the “history of an error,” the path by which ancient philosophers cast doubt on the “real” (that is, the observable) world. At first, he states, people existed in the real world. Then philosophers (and religious leaders) claimed the real world (or the enlightened world, or the afterlife) was only attainable for the wise (or, in Christian doctrine, the redeemed). And once people couldn’t attain the real world, it became unknown—and then unreal—to them. Once they saw the world as unreal, it became irrelevant to life, and they were no longer motivated to attain it. Finally—with the real world irrelevant and inconsequential to human existence—the apparent world replaced the real world. In this context, the apparent world refers to a mere representation of reality—not reality itself. In the apparent world, we can’t rely on our senses to tell us anything true about reality. The ancient Greek philosopher Plato (whom Nietzsche attacks directly in Twilight of the Idols) conceived of the idea in his Theory of Forms, a method of understanding reality that differentiates between the realm of forms (the apparent world) and the physical realm (the real world). In Twilight of the Idols, Nietzsche expands his attack on past philosophers’ denial of the real world into a broader criticism of past philosophers who taught people to cast doubt on their senses (or instincts), thus destroying their self-confidence and thrusting society into a state of nihilism and despair.

Related Themes from Other Texts
Compare and contrast themes from other texts to this theme…

The Ideal vs. The Real ThemeTracker

The ThemeTracker below shows where, and to what degree, the theme of The Ideal vs. The Real appears in each chapter of Twilight of the Idols. Click or tap on any chapter to read its Summary & Analysis.
How often theme appears:
chapter length:
Get the entire Twilight of the Idols LitChart as a printable PDF.
"My students can't get enough of your charts and their results have gone through the roof." -Graham S.
Twilight of the Idols PDF

The Ideal vs. The Real Quotes in Twilight of the Idols

Below you will find the important quotes in Twilight of the Idols related to the theme of The Ideal vs. The Real .

Foreword Quotes

Nothing succeeds in which high spirits play no part.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 31
Explanation and Analysis:
In the Foreword to Twilight of the Idols, Nietzsche lays out the book’s central purposes. “Nothing succeeds in which high spirits play no part,” he states here, giving an implicit nod to the despairing, nihilistic culture out of which Twilight of the Idols emerged—and which motivated him to write it in the first place. Nietzsche believes that conventional systems of morality—namely Christian morality—have made society nihilistic and decadent. Moreover, he thinks that these unnatural rules of conduct—right and wrong—have made people distrust themselves and the world around them. In short, morality has instilled a sense of self-hatred in them and Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium

Another form of recovery, in certain cases even more suited to me, is to sound out idols. …There are more idols in the world than there are realities: that is my ‘evil eye’ for this world, that is also my ‘evil ear’. … For once to pose questions here with a hammer and perhaps to receive for answer that famous hollow sound which speaks of inflated bowels—what a delight for one who has ears behind his ears—for an old psychologist and pied piper like me, in presence of whom precisely that which would like to stay silent has to become audible…

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Related Symbols: The Hammer
Page Number and Citation: 31
Explanation and Analysis:
In the Foreword, Nietzsche identifies his purpose in writing Twilight of the Idols. He thinks society’s degraded state is the consequence of centuries of philosophers and moralists idolizing unattainable standards of moral conduct. In the book, he examines why the worship of ideals is destructive and sets in motion a plan to help society recover from the decadent, nihilistic state it’s fallen to. This passage contains Nietzsche’s proposed plan for “recovery.” Nietzsche states that he will “sound out idols” by “pos[ing] questions here with a hammer.” Striking the idols with a hammer, he argues, will create a “hollow sound,” meaning Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porr

Maxims and Arrows Quotes

31. When it is trodden on a worm will curl up. That is prudent. It thereby reduces the chance of being trodden on again. In the language of morals: humility.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Related Symbols: The Trodden Worm
Page Number and Citation: 36
Explanation and Analysis:
This passage comes from “Maxims and Arrows,” which (as the title suggests) consists of 44 numbered maxims related to the core ideas of Twilight of the Idols. Maxim #31 is a play on the common saying, “even the trodden worm will turn.” Unaltered, the phrase expresses the sentiment that even the meekest, most unassuming creature (the worm) will fight back if it’s pushed down enough. But Nietzsche alters the saying, swapping “turn” with “curl up.” Thus, the phrase becomes not an expression of strength and resilience but an illustration of how creatures that are beaten down enough really just sink Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ips

39. The disappointed man speaks. – I sought great human beings, I never found anything but the apes of their ideal.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 37
Explanation and Analysis:
This passage comes from “Maxims and Arrows,” which (as the title suggests) consists of 44 numbered maxims related to the core ideas of Twilight of the Idols. As is characteristic of Nietzsche’s writing, the maxims have a distinct style and employ lots of figurative language. In this maxim, Nietzsche, embodying the consciousness of “The disappointed man,” describes his search—and failure—to find “great human beings.” Rather than “great human beings,” he found only “the apes of their ideal.” A few things are going on here. First, when Nietzsche states that he looked for “great” or strong or vital human beings, he’s Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Q

The Problem of Socrates Quotes

In every age the wisest have passed the identical judgement on life: it is worthless. … Everywhere and always their mouths have uttered the same sound—a sound full of doubt, full of melancholy, full of weariness with life, full of opposition to life.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker), Socrates
Page Number and Citation: 39
Explanation and Analysis:
In “The Problem of Socrates,” Nietzsche lays out the origins of society’s obsession with unattainable idols/ideals, which he traces back to Socrates. Nietzsche blames Socrates for introducing logic and rationality into mainstream philosophical thought. Reason and rationality, Nietzsche argues, have taught humanity to be skeptical of the observable world and human instinct. This skepticism, in turn, has made people “full of doubt, full of melancholy, full of weariness with life, full of opposition to life.” And all this is to blame for the nihilism and decadence that characterizes the modern world. This passage is important because it outlines the traits Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debit

Judgements, value judgements concerning life, for or against, can in the last resort never be true: they possess value only as symptoms, they come into consideration only as symptoms—in themselves such judgements are stupidities. One must reach out and try to grasp this astonishing finesse, that the value of life cannot be estimated.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker), Socrates
Page Number and Citation: 40
Explanation and Analysis:
In “The Problem of Socrates,” Nietzsche describes how the nihilism and decadence that characterize the modern world came to be. He attributes their hold on modern intellectual culture to Socratic philosophy, which values argumentative discourse and reason, and which taught humanity to use logic and rationality to view themselves and the surrounding world with skepticism and doubt. By examining the world critically and rationally, Socrates held, people could make “value judgments concerning life” and decide what is right versus wrong, good versus evil. Socrates also proposed that reason, virtue, and happiness are interconnected. But Nietzsche disagrees with this perspective. He Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia solut

“Reason” in Philosophy Quotes

All that philosophers have handled for millennia has been conceptual mummies; nothing actual has escaped from their hands alive.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker), Socrates
Page Number and Citation: 45
Explanation and Analysis:
In “‘Reason’” in Philosophy,” Nietzsche expands on his critique of reason in western philosophy. In this passage, which occurs at the beginning of “‘Reason’ in Philosophy,” Nietzsche critiques philosophers’ idolatry of the past. When Nietzsche claims that philosophers have only dealt with “conceptual mummies,” he’s alluding to the way that philosophers uphold and idealize old values—in particular, Socrates’ obsession with reason—instead of creating new ones. Nietzsche’s opposition to worshipping past values is the central theme of Twilight of the Idols. He thinks that worshipping unexamined old ideas is bad for humanity because it suppresses humanity’s natural instinct to evolve and Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt

We possess scientific knowledge today to precisely the extent that we have decided to accept the evidence of the senses—to the extent that we have learned to sharpen and arm them and to think them through to their conclusions.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker), Socrates
Page Number and Citation: 46
Explanation and Analysis:
In “‘Reason’ in Philosophy,” Nietzsche debunks the idea proposed by Socrates (and which has been a core idea of western philosophy ever since) that reason—and not the senses—gives way to absolute truth. Nietzsche doesn’t think that empirical “scientific knowledge” and “the senses” are mutually exclusive. Rather, he sees reason as a consequence of the senses: “We possess scientific knowledge today to precisely the extent that we have decided to accept the evidence of the senses,” argues Nietzsche. Put simply, our senses are what give us the ability to reason and think critically. Reason doesn’t happen outside of the body: it Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempor

To talk about ‘another’ world than this is quite pointless, provided that an instinct for slandering, disparaging and accusing life is not strong within us: in the latter case we revenge ourselves on life by means of the phantasmagoria of ‘another’, a ‘better’ life.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker), Plato, Socrates
Page Number and Citation: 48
Explanation and Analysis:
In “‘Reason’ in Philosophy,” Nietzsche challenges the idea put forth by ancient philosophers like Plato (and embraced by many western philosophers thereafter) that there exist two kinds of being: material and immaterial. The material world is that which we can discern with our senses, and the immaterial world is the world of ideals. Whereas pre-Socratic philosophers mostly trusted the senses, Socrates’s introduction of dialectical thinking into western philosophy taught people to distrust their instincts and, by extension, question the reality of the physical, material world. This kind of thinking also taught them that the immaterial world of ideas and knowledge Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nis

How the “Real World” at last Became a Myth Quotes

6. We have abolished the real world: what world is left? the apparent world perhaps? … But no! with the real world we have also abolished the apparent world!

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker), Plato
Page Number and Citation: 51
Explanation and Analysis:
In this chapter, Nietzsche provides six numbered steps to explain (as the title suggests) “How the ‘Real World’ at last Became a Myth,” or how ancient philosophers taught humanity to distrust the observable world and aspire to an unattainable, idealized version of that world instead. This passage comes from the final step of that process, in which people not only doubt their senses and scrutinize the material world—but destroy it altogether. The distinction between the “real” and “apparent” world that Nietzsche articulates here comes from Plato’s Theory of Forms. In this philosophical theory, there exists a “real” world of ideals Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placea

Morality as Anti-Nature Quotes

To exterminate the passions and desires merely in order to do away with their folly and its unpleasant consequences—this itself seems to us today merely an acute form of folly. We no longer admire dentists who pull out the teeth to stop them hurting.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 52
Explanation and Analysis:
In “Morality as Anti-Nature,” Nietzsche shifts his critical gaze to Christianity. He argues that Christian morality has taught people that human instincts—“passions and desires”—are base and immoral and that we need to “exterminate” these instincts if we want to live an improved, moral life. Nietzsche thinks that being taught to hate and devalue human instinct and other sensory experiences has made humans view life as meaningless and worthless. In this passage, Nietzsche specifically takes issue with morality’s proposed method of correcting humanity’s base impulses—resisting and repressing them at all costs. “To exterminate the passions and desires merely in order to Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae cor

But to attack the passions at their roots means to attack life at its roots: the practice of the Church is hostile to life…

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 52
Explanation and Analysis:
In “Morality as Anti-Nature,” Nietzsche examines how morality (and Christian morality in particular) devalues life. This quote explicitly spells out why Nietzsche thinks this is the case. “But to attack the passions at their roots means to attack life at its roots,” argues Nietzsche. For Nietzsche, the primary way Christianity attacks life is through “attack[ing] the passions,” construing natural human instincts like lust as sinful and incompatible with living a happy, meaningful life. The Church argues that people need to use willpower and higher reasoning skills to stop themselves from acting on their sinful urges. They say that the key Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. M

All naturalism in morality, that is all healthy morality, is dominated by an instinct of life—some commandment of life is fulfilled through a certain canon of ‘shall’ and ‘shall not’, some hindrance and hostile element on life’s road is thereby removed. Anti-natural morality, that is virtually every morality that has hitherto been taught, reverenced and preached, turns on the contrary precisely against the instincts of life—it is a now secret, now loud and impudent condemnation of these instincts. By saying ‘God sees into the heart’ it denies the deepest and the highest desires of life and takes God for the enemy of life….The saint in whom God takes pleasure is the ideal castrate….Life is at an end where the ‘kingdom of God’ begins…

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 56
Explanation and Analysis:
In “Morality as Anti-Nature,” Nietzsche examines how morality (and Christian morality in particular) devalues life. The primary way that morality does this is through condemning natural human instincts as sinful. In this passage, Nietzsche distinguishes between “healthy” morality (which he condones) and unhealthy morality (to which “virtually every morality that has hitherto been taught, reverenced and preached” belongs). Healthy morality, which emphasizes “naturalism” (the belief that everything exists out of natural causes, and spiritual elements don’t exist), has “an instinct of life” because its focus is on removing “hindrance[s] and hostile element[s] on life’s road” and preserving human life. For Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam. Aliquid iste enim. Sequi aut maxime. Adipisci voluptate et. Voluptas suscipit alias. In et eveniet. Eaque et repellendus. Dolores aut voluptatibus. Voluptatem qui voluptatum. Voluptatibus sed placeat. Aut tenetur autem. Fugit voluptate

The Four Great Errors Quotes

There is no more dangerous error than that of mistaking the consequence for the cause. I call it reason’s intrinsic form of corruption. None the less, this error is among the most ancient and most recent habits of mankind: it is even sanctified among us, it bears the names ‘religion’ and ‘morality’.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker), Luigi Cornaro
Page Number and Citation: 58
Explanation and Analysis:
In “The Four Great Errors,” Nietzsche identifies and examines what he considers to be the four main errors that philosophy has made throughout history. In this passage, Nietzsche discusses the first of these errors: the error “of mistaking the consequence for the cause,” or the error of confusing cause for effect, and vice versa. For Nietzsche, this error is the foundation of all commonly accepted moral codes. It’s also the most serious error. The way this error works is that the philosopher (or moralist or theologian) identifies a belief they want to uphold or condone. Then they manufacture a logical Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accus

Everywhere accountability is sought, it is usually the instinct for punishing and judging which seeks it.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 64
Explanation and Analysis:
In “The Four Great Errors,” Nietzsche unpacks the four main errors that philosophy has made throughout history. In this passage, Nietzsche discusses the fourth error: the error of free will. Nietzsche thinks that free will—the idea that humans can control (and are therefore accountable for) their thoughts and actions—was created to “punish and judge” people. Christian morality, in particular, uses free will to condemn human instincts. If people have free will, then they have the power to suppress and eliminate instinct that is (according to the Church) sinful. So people who act on instinct, then, are fully responsible for their Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi

The “Improvers” of Mankind Quotes

In physiological terms: in the struggle with the beast, making it sick can be the only means of making it weak. This the Church understood: it corrupted the human being, it weakened him—but it claimed to have ‘improved’ him…

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 67
Explanation and Analysis:
In “The ‘Improvers’ of Mankind,” Nietzsche criticizes the moralists—primarily religious moralists—who exploit morality to control their followers. Nietzsche argues that philosophers and moralists throughout history have argued that good morals improve the human condition, when they really do just the opposite. For example, Nietzsche likens humans who answer to moral codes to animals beaten and tamed into submission. “in the struggle with the beast, making it sick can be the only means of making it weak.” Nietzsche suggests morals are the weapon moralists use to weaken people and make them subservient, loyal followers. Nietzsche thinks that morals make people weak-willed Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea.

Expressed in a formula one might say: every means hitherto employed with the intention of making mankind moral has been thoroughly immoral.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 70
Explanation and Analysis:
In “The ‘Improvers’ of Mankind,” Nietzsche argues that there is no such thing as absolute, objective morality. To prove his point, he examines how moralists (primarily religious leaders) have imposed moral codes on humanity through immoral means. The lines in this passage are the final lines of this section. They contain the conclusion that Nietzsche ultimately reaches: “every means hitherto employed with the intention of making mankind moral has been thoroughly immoral.” Nietzsche is saying that the moral codes of these supposed authorities on objectively high morality aren’t as clear-cut and objective as they might seem. Instead, every initiative they Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Inci

What the Germans Lack Quotes

‘Are there any German philosophers? are there any German poets? are there any good German books?’—people ask me abroad. I blush; but with the courage which is mine even in desperate cases I answer: ‘Yes, Bismarck!’

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 71
Explanation and Analysis:
In “What the Germans Lack,” Nietzsche redirects his critical gaze toward the Germany of his present day. Nietzsche’s most significant gripe with contemporary German culture is that it prioritizes political influence and economic power and, as a result, its cultural output stalls and suffers. Nietzsche thinks it’s impossible to focus on politics and culture. They are mutually exclusive pursuits. And when a nation becomes too fixated on political influence, it denies itself the ability to make good art. Here, Nietzsche describes his response when people abroad ask him about the current state of German philosophy, poetry, and literature. When people Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque

Expeditions of an Untimely Man Quotes

The most spiritual human beings, assuming they are the most courageous, also experience by far the most painful tragedies: but it is precisely for this reason that they honour life, because it brings against them its most formidable weapons.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 88
Explanation and Analysis:
In “Expeditions of an Untimely Man,” Nietzsche examines (mostly critically) various intellectual figures of his day. He also offers psychological insight into the problems that plague modern society. In this passage, Nietzsche establishes a connection between “[t]he most spiritual human beings” and people who “experience the most painful tragedies.” In Twilight of the Idols,  Nietzsche criticizes philosophy for instilling an intolerance for suffering, discomfort, and uncertainty in humanity. This intolerance, in large part, is why philosophy has come to place such a high value on reason: it sees reason as a way out of suffering and uncertainty. But Nietzsche thinks Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam.

An ‘altruistic’ morality, a morality under which egoism languishes—is under all circumstances a bad sign. This applies to individuals, it applies especially to peoples. The best are lacking when egoism begins to be lacking. To choose what is harmful to oneself, to be attracted by ‘disinterested’ motives, almost constitutes the formula for décadence.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 98
Explanation and Analysis:
In “Expeditions of an Untimely Man,” Nietzsche examines the philosophical worldviews of an array of his contemporaries, mostly from a critical perspective. He also scrutinizes contemporary political and social trends. Here, he critiques society’s embrace of “‘altruistic’ morality.” Altruism is a “disinterested” or selfless concern for the welfare of others, and Nietzsche sees this selflessness as directly contradicting humankind’s instinct for self-preservation. Because true altruism involves a total indifference to one’s personal welfare in pursuit of the wellbeing of others, it can be antithetical to the preservation of one’s own life. And since humankind has an instinct for self-preservation or Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commod

The criminal type is the type of the strong human being under unfavourable conditions, a strong human being made sick. What he lacks is the wilderness, a certain freer and more perilous nature and form of existence in which all that is attack and deference in the instinct of the strong human being comes into its own. His virtues have been excommunicated by society; the liveliest drives within him forthwith blend with the depressive emotions, with suspicion, fear, dishonour.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 110
Explanation and Analysis:
In Expeditions of an Untimely Man, Nietzsche often critically examines the figures and ideas of his contemporary world. He offers keen psychological insight into social and intellectual trends and analyzes how these trends either uphold or suppress human instinct. Here, Nietzsche considers criminality. He looks on the criminal favorably, seeing the criminal as “the strong human being under unfavourable conditions, a strong human being made sick.” Nietzsche sees criminality as an external rather than an internal problem. He doesn’t think that people have an inherent drive toward criminality; instead, he argues that “unfavourable conditions,” and in particular, imposed social conditions Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit be

What I Owe to the Ancients Quotes

Ultimately my mistrust of Plato extends to the very bottom of him: I find him deviated so far from all the fundamental instincts of the Hellenes, so morally infected, so much an antecedent Christian—he already has the concept ‘good’ as the supreme concept—that I should prefer to describe the entire phenomenon ‘Plato’ by the harsh term ‘higher swindle’ or, if you prefer, ‘idealism’, than by any other.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker), Plato
Page Number and Citation: 117
Explanation and Analysis:
In “What I Owe to the Ancients,” Nietzsche considers the ancient world—mainly through a critical lens, as he does here with his analysis of Plato. Nietzsche condemns Plato for “deviat[ing] so far from the fundamental instincts of the Hellenes.” Nietzsche sees a tension between Apollonian and Dionysian impulses (order and disorder, rationality and impassion) as the foundation of Greek drama. He thinks that Plato has strayed from this ever since he became “morally infected” and obsessed with the idea that the apparent world can’t be trusted and that an ideal, unattainable world exists elsewhere that is more real than the Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi solut

Affirmation of life even in its strangest and sternest problems, the will to life rejoicing in its own inexhaustibility through the sacrifice of its highest types—that is what I called Dionysian, that is what I recognized as the bridge to the psychology of the tragic poet. Not so as to get rid of pity and terror, not so as to purify oneself of a dangerous emotion and through its vehement discharge—it was thus Aristotle understood it—: but, beyond pity and terror, to realize in oneself the eternal joy of becoming—that joy which also encompasses joy in destruction.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 121
Explanation and Analysis:
In “What I Owe to the Ancients,” Nietzsche examines the ancient world. While he has no use for much of antiquity (the whole point of this book is to rethink all values and to break free from the philosophies of the past), there are a handful of thinkers and concepts he draws on in his own philosophy. One example is the Dionysian force or impulse. Nietzsche’s earlier work, The Birth of Tragedy, discusses how Greek tragedy relies on a tension between the Apollonian and Dionysian forces or impulses. Apollo is the god of light, reason, and balance; by contrast, Dionysus Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam. Aliquid iste enim. Sequi aut maxime. Adipisci voluptate et. Voluptas suscipit alias. In et eveniet. Eaque et repellendus. Dolores aut voluptatibus. Voluptatem qui voluptatum. Voluptatibus sed placeat. Aut

The Hammer Speaks Quotes

And if your hardness will not flash and cut and cut to pieces: how can you one day—create with me?

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Related Symbols: The Hammer
Page Number and Citation: 122
Explanation and Analysis:
The final section of Twilight of the Idols depicts a conversation between a piece of charcoal and a diamond. Nietzsche derives the section’s themes from Part III, “Of Old and New Law-Tables,” of his famous work of philosophical fiction, Thus Spoke Zarathustra. In “Of Old and New Law-Tables,” the book’s protagonist, a prophet named Zarathustra, contemplates what is required to create a new value system. Zarathustra decides that creating a new value system requires destroying the old value system. In Twilight of the Idols, this conversation between the charcoal and diamond reaches the same conclusion. The charcoal asks the diamond Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam. Aliquid iste enim. Sequi