- All's Well That Ends Well
- Antony and Cleopatra
- As You Like It
- The Comedy of Errors
- Coriolanus
- Cymbeline
- Hamlet
- Henry IV, Part 1
- Henry IV, Part 2
- Henry V
- Henry VI, Part 1
- Henry VI, Part 2
- Henry VI, Part 3
- Henry VIII
- Julius Caesar
- King John
- King Lear
- Love's Labor's Lost
- A Lover's Complaint
- Macbeth
- Measure for Measure
- The Merchant of Venice
- The Merry Wives of Windsor
- A Midsummer Night's Dream
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Othello
- Pericles
- The Rape of Lucrece
- Richard II
- Richard III
- Romeo and Juliet
- Shakespeare's Sonnets
- The Taming of the Shrew
- The Tempest
- Timon of Athens
- Titus Andronicus
- Troilus and Cressida
- Twelfth Night
- The Two Gentlemen of Verona
- Venus and Adonis
- The Winter's Tale
Arendt’s crucial argument is that crime violates a community—which is why perpetrators are prosecuted by the state and cases often called People v. Defendant—and not merely particular victims (as in civil cases). This helps her condemn Eichmann in a handful of ways that the court cannot. First, it explains how the genocide of Jews can fundamentally be a crime against humanity and not merely against the Jewish people, because the destruction of an entire group of people is an affront to the humanity of all people, which is founded on recognizing the value of others despite their difference…