- All's Well That Ends Well
- Antony and Cleopatra
- As You Like It
- The Comedy of Errors
- Coriolanus
- Cymbeline
- Hamlet
- Henry IV, Part 1
- Henry IV, Part 2
- Henry V
- Henry VI, Part 1
- Henry VI, Part 2
- Henry VI, Part 3
- Henry VIII
- Julius Caesar
- King John
- King Lear
- Love's Labor's Lost
- A Lover's Complaint
- Macbeth
- Measure for Measure
- The Merchant of Venice
- The Merry Wives of Windsor
- A Midsummer Night's Dream
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Othello
- Pericles
- The Rape of Lucrece
- Richard II
- Richard III
- Romeo and Juliet
- Shakespeare's Sonnets
- The Taming of the Shrew
- The Tempest
- Timon of Athens
- Titus Andronicus
- Troilus and Cressida
- Twelfth Night
- The Two Gentlemen of Verona
- Venus and Adonis
- The Winter's Tale
In Book One of Mere Christianity, C. S. Lewis makes the controversial argument that moral law is a real thing—a universal, timeless set of guidelines for how human beings are meant to behave. But toward the end of Book One, Lewis goes even further and makes the argument that the existence of a universal moral law implies the existence of a powerful being who created the moral law. As Lewis argues, moral law is an abstract concept—therefore, it seems likely that its creator is a non-material being. Or, “put the other way round,” a non-material being, like God, can…