The Fall
by Albert Camus
✓

or to save your progress

Need another quote?
Need analysis on another quote?
Need analysis for a quote we don't cover?
Need analysis for a quote we don't cover?
Need analysis for a quote we don't cover?
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
Request it
Request it
Request analysis
Request analysis
Request analysis

Pages 3-16 Quotes

Anyone who has considerably meditated on man, by profession or vocation, is led to feel nostalgia for the primates. They at least don’t have any ulterior motives.

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Bartender, The Listener
Page Number and Citation: 4
Explanation and Analysis:
The narrator has just ordered a drink for his unnamed listener, who speaks French, from the bartender, who speaks only Dutch. The narrator then briefly describes the character of the bartender, who like all humankind has “ulterior motives” despite being in other ways almost as primitive as “the primates.” The narrator’s move from describing the character of a particular individual (in this case, the bartender) to making general claims about “man” is representative of his rhetoric throughout the novel: he regularly condemns his own or some other person’s guilt, egotism, or hypocrisy only to claim this bad behavior is endemic Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit n

Have you noticed that Amsterdam’s concentric canals resemble the circles of hell?

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Listener
Page Number and Citation: 14
Explanation and Analysis:
After meeting the unnamed listener in a bar, the narrator offers to walk him partway back to his hotel. As they walk and talk, the narrator observes that “Amsterdam’s concentric canals resemble the circles of hell.” Here the narrator is referring not just to a Judeo-Christian theology of the afterlife but specifically to the Medieval Italian poet Dante Alighieri’s Divine Comedy (c. 1321), an epic poem divided into three parts corresponding to different places in the Catholic Christian vision of the afterlife: hell, purgatory, and heaven. In Dante’s Inferno, the first part of the Divine Comedy, which describes hell, hell Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam. Aliquid iste enim. Sequi aut maxime. Adipisci voluptate et. Voluptas suscipit alias. In et eveniet. Eaque et repellendus. Dolores aut voluptatibus. Voluptatem qui voluptatum. Voluptat

Pages 17-41 Quotes

Of course, I didn’t tell you my real name.

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Listener
Page Number and Citation: 17
Explanation and Analysis:
Early in the narrator’s second meeting with his unnamed listener, he casually admits that the name by which he introduced himself at their first meeting, Jean-Baptiste Clamence, isn’t his “real name.” He claims that “of course” he didn’t give his real name because he used to be a famous lawyer in Paris, an identity he is trying to live down. Yet, understandably, readers may wonder what else the narrator has lied about or will lie about. That is, when the narrator casually admits that he lied about his name, the admission calls the reliability of all his narration into question. Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus

The feeling of the law, the satisfaction of being right, the joy of self-esteem, cher monsieur, are powerful incentives for keeping us upright or keeping us moving forward.

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Listener
Page Number and Citation: 18–19
Explanation and Analysis:
During their second meeting, the narrator describes to his unnamed listener—whom he calls “cher monsieur,” French for “dear sir”—his former career as a lawyer who took on many charitable pro bono cases. In describing his own motives for charitable professional acts, the narrator cynically suggests that judgmental tendencies (“the feeling of the law”), egotism (“the joy of self-esteem”) and certain sanctimonious, know-it-all qualities (“the satisfaction of being right”) were what kept him “upright” and doing good things. Characteristically, rather than limit his observations about judgmental tendencies, egotism, and sanctimony as motives for moral behavior to himself, the narrator generalizes to Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum volup

A very Christian friend of mine admitted that one’s initial feeling on seeing a beggar approach one’s house is unpleasant. Well, with me it was worse: I used to exult.

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Listener
Page Number and Citation: 21
Explanation and Analysis:
The narrator is still explaining to his unnamed listener what he (the narrator) was like as a successful lawyer in Paris who took on many charitable pro bono cases. Specifically, he is describing how he engaged in charity as a private citizen as well as in his profession—and how he “used to exult” at seeing poor and needy people such as “beggar[s]” because it gave him the opportunity to demonstrate his own generosity and goodness. The narrator contrasts his “very Christian friend” and himself to expose the common hypocrisy of apparently quite different people. According to Catholic Christian ethics (as Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam. Aliquid iste enim. Sequi aut maxime. Adipisci voluptate et. Voluptas suscipit ali

Even in the details of daily life, I needed to feel above. I preferred the bus to the subway, open carriages to taxis, terraces to closed-in places.

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Listener
Page Number and Citation: 23
Explanation and Analysis:
The narrator is still explaining what he was like as a famous Parisian lawyer who took on many charitable cases. In this explanation, he moves from suggesting that his good works sprang from smug, egotistical motives (i.e., that he did the right thing because it made him feel good about himself, not because it was the right thing) to suggesting that they sprang from a secret desire to dominate others and be superior to them. The narrator makes this suggestion indirectly, pointing out that “in the details of daily life” he “needed to feel above,” giving as one example his Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus har

That’s the way man is, cher monsieur. He has two faces: he can’t love without self-love.

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Listener, The Woman in Black
Page Number and Citation: 33–34
Explanation and Analysis:
The narrator has mentioned a fateful evening that permanently changed his sense of himself—but rather than tell the curious listener what happened on that evening right away, he digresses, arguing that all human beings’ love for their friends is fundamentally egotistical to the point that we enjoy our friends’ deaths because such deaths give us the opportunity to grieve self-indulgently. He summarizes the point of this digression by saying that “man,” by nature, “has two faces: he can’t love without self-love.” Through this digression, the narrator yet again seeks to persuade the listener that humankind in general is egotistical and Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. N

Pages 42-71 Quotes

Power, on the other hand, settles everything. It took time, but we finally realized that. For instance, you must have noticed that our old Europe at last philosophizes in the right way. We no longer say as in simple times: “This is the way I think. What are your objections?” For the dialogue we have substituted the communiqué: “This is the truth,” we say. “You can discuss it as much as you want; we aren’t interested. But in a few years there’ll be the police who will show you we are right.”

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Listener
Page Number and Citation: 45
Explanation and Analysis:
In his third conversation with the listener, the narrator is arguing that human relationships are characterized by domination and submission—that in any given relationship, people are effectively either the slave-masters or the enslaved. Moreover, he argues that people need relationships to operate according to a master-slave dynamic because they are unable to tolerate freedom or indeterminacy and “power […] settles everything.” When the narrator claims that “our old Europe at last philosophizes in the right way” and that Europeans are more interested in having their opinions enforced by “the police” than in debating others as equals, he may be referring Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam. Aliquid iste enim. Sequi aut max

You, for instance, mon cher compatriote, stop and think of what your sign would be. You are silent? Well, you’ll tell me later on. I know mine in any case: a double face, a charming Janus, and above it the motto of the house: “Don’t rely on it.”

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Listener
Page Number and Citation: 47
Explanation and Analysis:
The narrator and the listener have passed a shop sign representing the heads of enslaved Black people, which the narrator interprets to mean that historic owners of the shop were in the slave trade. This incident leads the narrator to argue that enslavement is a natural consequence of people’s desire to dominate others but that the modern age hypocritically denies the ongoing existence of slavery-like exploitation. Finally, he asks the listener—whom he calls “mon cher compatriote,” French for “my dear countryman”—what a shop sign that expressed his inner truth would be. When the listener chooses to be “silent” rather than Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. I

Oh, I don’t know. Really, I don’t know. The next day, and the days following, I didn’t read the papers.

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Woman in Black, The Listener
Page Number and Citation: 71
Explanation and Analysis:
The narrator has just recounted to his unnamed listener the fateful event that destroyed his unconsidered self-esteem and precipitated his existential crisis: one night, he was crossing a bridge when he passed by a woman in black—who jumped into the water. Though she cried out afterward, he didn’t try to help her but simply froze and then walked on. At the end of the conversation, as the narrator and the listener are saying their goodbyes, it is implied that the listener asks the narrator what happened to the woman—to which the narrator admits that he “didn’t read the papers” and Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt.

Pages 72-96 Quotes

I have no more friends; I have nothing but accomplices. To make up for this, their number has increased; they are the whole human race. And within the human race, you first of all. Whoever is at hand is always the first.

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Listener
Page Number and Citation: 73
Explanation and Analysis:
The narrator and the listener have gone on a boating trip on the Zuider Zee (a former bay that has since been dammed, creating a freshwater lake).  On the trip, the narrator casually refers to his friends—only to correct himself, saying that he has “no more friends” but only “accomplices.” An accomplice is someone who associates with or provides aid to a criminal; thus, by calling the people around him “accomplices,” the narrator is casting himself as a criminal. The narrator’s claims here yet again foreshadow the revelation at the novel’s end that he is using his own self-condemning stories Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenet

To be sure, I knew my failings and regretted them. Yet I continued to forget them with a rather meritorious obstinacy. The prosecution of others, on the contrary, went on constantly in my heart. Of course—does that shock you? Maybe you think it’s not logical? But the question is not to remain logical. The question is to slip through and, above all—yes, above all, the question is to elude judgment.

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Listener
Page Number and Citation: 76
Explanation and Analysis:
Here the narrator is describing to his unnamed listener his perhaps counterintuitive reaction to realizing his own “failings,” which he “regretted”: he tried to “forget them” while mentally engaging in the “prosecution of others.” While the narrator concedes that this reaction is “not logical”—and is, by implication, quite hypocritical—he makes clear that his purpose was not “to remain logical” but “to elude judgment.” The narrator’s explanation of his former mental state helps clarify the relationships among judgment, egotism, and hypocrisy in the novel. This quotation suggests that human beings’ self-judgment and their natural egotism combine to make them hypocritical. Like Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea.

As I told you, it’s a matter of dodging judgment. Since it is hard to dodge it, tricky to get one’s nature simultaneously admired and excused, they all strive to be rich. Why? Did you ever ask yourself? For power, of course. But especially because wealth shields from immediate judgment, takes you out of the subway crowd to enclose you in a chromium-plated automobile, isolates you in huge protected lawns, Pullmans, first-class cabins.

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Listener
Page Number and Citation: 82
Explanation and Analysis:
The narrator has just theorized for his unnamed listener the relationship between people’s self-judgment, egotism, and hypocrisy: if people have any self-knowledge, they know they have flaws. Due to their egotism, however, they want to think well of themselves and want others to think well of them, and so they hypocritically forget or hide their own flaws while projecting those flaws onto others, harshly judging them. Now the narrator goes on to theorize the relationship between these phenomena and the human desire “for power,” arguing that people want to be powerful because power—particularly in the form of “wealth”—insulates people from Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferen

Then I realized, as a result of delving in my memory, that modesty helped me to sin, humility to conquer, and virtue to oppress.

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Listener
Page Number and Citation: 84
Explanation and Analysis:
The narrator continues to explain to his unnamed listener how remembering his own failings caused his worldview to dramatically evolve. Here, he is explaining the conclusion he came to that his previous adherence to conventional morality was a hypocritical cover for egotism and lust for power.  The narrator expresses this conclusion using a rhetorical device called “antithesis,” the yoking together of contradictory concepts in grammatical parallel: “modesty […] to sin,” “humility to conquer,” and “virtue to oppress.” Through this antithesis, he suggests that modesty, humility and virtue are really agents of sin, conquest, and oppression: by displaying his apparent moral Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dign

Pages 97-118 Quotes

I realized likewise that it would continue to await me on seas and rivers, everywhere, in short, where lies the bitter water of my baptism.

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Listener, The Woman in Black
Page Number and Citation: 108
Explanation and Analysis:
The narrator is explaining to his unnamed listener how, after he remembered the incident in which he failed to intervene in a young woman’s suicide by drowning, he attempted to block out his own sense of inadequacy through sexual excess and alcoholic abuse—and he thought he had succeeded until, one day, he went on a cruise and panicked when he mistook a piece of trash in the water for a drowning person. This experience let him to realize that he would never block out his memory of the woman in black, which would follow him “everywhere […] where lies the Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam. Aliquid iste enim. Sequi aut maxime. Adipisci voluptate et. Voluptas suscipit alias. In et eveniet. Eaque et repellendus. Dolores aut vo

I had to submit and admit my guilt. I had to live in the little-ease. To be sure, you are not familiar with that dungeon-cell that was called the little-ease in the Middle Ages. In general, one was forgotten there for life. That cell was distinguished from others by ingenious dimensions. It was not high enough to stand up in nor yet wide enough to lie down in.

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Woman in Black, The Listener
Related Symbols: The Little-Ease
Page Number and Citation: 109
Explanation and Analysis:
The narrator is explaining to his unnamed listener his state of mind after he realized that he would never successfully repress his guilty memories of failing to save the woman in black from suicide by drowning. He compares this state of “submit[ting] to guilt” with “liv[ing] in the little-ease,” a Medieval torture device that consisted of a tiny room “not high enough to stand up in nor yet wide enough to lie down in.” Here, the narrator is self-consciously using the little-ease as a symbol of egotism’s torturous Catch-22. Due to his egotism, the narrator is intensely preoccupied with himself Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Volupta

They have hoisted him onto a judge’s bench, in the secret of their hearts, and they smite, they judge above all, they judge in his name. He spoke softly to the adulteress: “Neither do I condemn thee!” but that doesn’t matter; they condemn without absolving anyone.

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 115
Explanation and Analysis:
The narrator is contrasting the behavior of Jesus Christ with the behavior of subsequent Christians. To do so, he alludes to John 8:1-11. In this New Testament passage, Jesus’ enemies bring to him a woman caught committing adultery, point out that in Mosaic Law (i.e., the first five books of the Old Testament) women caught in adultery are condemned to death by stoning, and ask what Jesus says to that. Jesus replies that someone who has never committed a sin should be the first to throw a stone at the woman. At that, the crowd disperses, leaving Jesus with the Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et

Pages 119-147 Quotes

Justice being definitively separated from innocence—the latter on the cross and the former in the cupboard—I have the way clear to work according to my convictions.

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Listener
Related Symbols: The Painting
Page Number and Citation: 130
Explanation and Analysis:
The listener has visited the narrator while the narrator is lying in bed at home with a fever. There, the narrator reveals to the listener that he has in his possession a stolen painting, Van Eyck’s “The Just Judges,” a 15th-century altarpiece panel really stolen from the Saint Bavo Cathedral in Ghent, Belgium in 1934 and never recovered. When the listener asks why the narrator hasn’t given the stolen painting to the police, the narrator offers a series of specious self-justifications before finally claiming that with “justice” (i.e. the painting, the “Just Judges”) “in the cupboard” (where he hides the Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam. Aliquid iste enim. Sequi aut maxime. Adipisci voluptate et. Voluptas suscipit alias. In et eveniet. Eaque et repe

Alone in a forbidding room, alone in the prisoner’s box before the judges, and alone to decide in the face of oneself or in the face of others’ judgment. At the end of all freedom is a court sentence; that’s why freedom is too heavy to bear, especially when you’re down with a fever, or are distressed, or love nobody.

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Listener
Page Number and Citation: 133
Explanation and Analysis:
The narrator is explaining to his unnamed listener why he is in favor of domination, slavery, and oppression, all means of stealing individuals’ freedom. He defends this position by claiming that freedom leaves people “alone,” a word he emphatically repeats to underscore that free choice is something inherently possessed by individuals, not groups. Specifically, freedom leaves individuals “alone” to face “a court sentence.” By this, the narrator seems to mean that being free makes individuals responsible for their own choices (“alone to decide”). This freedom of choice and its accompanying moral responsibility then expose individuals to their own and others’ Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore la

Brr . . . ! The water’s so cold! But let’s not worry! It’s too late now. It will always be too late. Fortunately!

Related Characters: The Narrator (speaker), The Listener, The Woman in Black
Page Number and Citation: 147
Explanation and Analysis:
At the novel’s very end, the narrator encourages the listener to confess that he (the listener) failed to save the young woman in black from her suicide by drowning—that is, confess to the exact same guilt that the narrator claims precipitated his own existential crisis—and suggests that the listener should ask the woman in black to jump into the water again so that he might have a second chance of saving her. Then the narrator, bizarrely, adds that “fortunately” it “will always be too late” to save her because “the water’s so cold.” There are two ways to interpret this Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam. Aliquid iste enim. Sequi aut maxime. Adipisci voluptate et. Voluptas suscipit alias. In et eveniet. Eaque et repellendus. Dolores aut voluptatibus. Voluptatem qui voluptatum. Voluptatibus sed placeat. Aut tenetur autem. Fugit voluptates in. Quidem impedit sunt. Excepturi ullam nobis. Ducimus odio quo. Ut autem harum. Omnis vel voluptatum. Assumenda officia maiores. Voluptatem sint velit. Quod quia sapiente
No matches.