- All's Well That Ends Well
- Antony and Cleopatra
- As You Like It
- The Comedy of Errors
- Coriolanus
- Cymbeline
- Hamlet
- Henry IV, Part 1
- Henry IV, Part 2
- Henry V
- Henry VI, Part 1
- Henry VI, Part 2
- Henry VI, Part 3
- Henry VIII
- Julius Caesar
- King John
- King Lear
- Love's Labor's Lost
- A Lover's Complaint
- Macbeth
- Measure for Measure
- The Merchant of Venice
- The Merry Wives of Windsor
- A Midsummer Night's Dream
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Othello
- Pericles
- The Rape of Lucrece
- Richard II
- Richard III
- Romeo and Juliet
- Shakespeare's Sonnets
- The Taming of the Shrew
- The Tempest
- Timon of Athens
- Titus Andronicus
- Troilus and Cressida
- Twelfth Night
- The Two Gentlemen of Verona
- Venus and Adonis
- The Winter's Tale
In discussing the tendency for white political philosophers to discount non-white thinkers, Mills argues that existing calls for diversifying curricula are not enough. According to Mills, simply introducing non-white voices into a white-dominated field of study will do little to change academia’s fundamental power structure. In particular, these non-white thinkers end up seeming like curious exceptions to the rule of “universal” (meaning white) theory. For instance, a philosophy class that focuses on European philosophers but includes a few non-white philosophers might suggest that most important thought happened in Europe, but that a few non-Europeans also had worthwhile ideas on topics…