- All's Well That Ends Well
- Antony and Cleopatra
- As You Like It
- The Comedy of Errors
- Coriolanus
- Cymbeline
- Hamlet
- Henry IV, Part 1
- Henry IV, Part 2
- Henry V
- Henry VI, Part 1
- Henry VI, Part 2
- Henry VI, Part 3
- Henry VIII
- Julius Caesar
- King John
- King Lear
- Love's Labor's Lost
- A Lover's Complaint
- Macbeth
- Measure for Measure
- The Merchant of Venice
- The Merry Wives of Windsor
- A Midsummer Night's Dream
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Othello
- Pericles
- The Rape of Lucrece
- Richard II
- Richard III
- Romeo and Juliet
- Shakespeare's Sonnets
- The Taming of the Shrew
- The Tempest
- Timon of Athens
- Titus Andronicus
- Troilus and Cressida
- Twelfth Night
- The Two Gentlemen of Verona
- Venus and Adonis
- The Winter's Tale
As they survey their research’s implications, Acemoglu and Robinson address one of the most controversial topics in contemporary politics and social science: China. They ask the crucial question of whether China’s rapid economic growth and broader economic model are sustainable. According to them, it isn’t, so they don’t think wealthy capitalist countries like the US have to worry that China will outcompete them in the long run.
Based on their analysis of growth under extractive institutions, the authors suggest that China’s growth will fizzle out. This is because China’s extractive institutions both stifle innovation and give elites the power to…