
|
|
Have questions?
Contact us
Already a member? Sign in
|
In Act 4, Part 1, Lord Caversham heartily criticizes his son for embodying what Caversham sees as the failings of the younger generation. In a moment of special dramatic irony, he contrasts his son’s behavior with that of Sir Robert Chiltern, who has just given a rousing speech against the Argentine Canal project in Parliament:
Lord Caversham: Do you mean to say you have not read The Times leading article on Robert Chiltern’s career?
Lord Goring: Good heavens! No. What does it say?
Lord Caversham: What should it say, sir? Everything complimentary, of course. Chiltern’s speech last night on this Argentine Canal scheme was one of the finest pieces of oratory ever delivered in the House since Canning.
Lord Goring: Ah! Never heard of Canning. Never wanted to. And did ... did Chiltern uphold the scheme?
Lord Caversham: Uphold it, sir? How little you know him! Why, he denounced it roundly…
Of course, it is thanks to Lord Goring’s moral clarity and his friendship with Robert Chiltern that Chiltern has been able to navigate the potential scandal with the Argentine Canal with such aplomb—but Caversham does not know this and Goring does not let on. Caversham’s criticisms of Goring are thus laden with dramatic irony: Goring is responsible for the very behavior in Chiltern that Caversham so admires.

Teacher
Common Core-aligned