
|
|
Have questions?
Contact us
Already a member? Sign in
|
Throughout the novel, Dickens uses the ironic tone of the narrator to satirize English laws for dealing with poverty, especially the Poor Law of 1834. An early instance of this satire occurs in chapter 2, which describes Oliver's infancy under this law:
[Oliver is] despatched to a branch-workhouse some three miles off, where twenty or thirty other juvenile offenders against the poor-laws rolled about the floor all day, without the inconvenience of too much food, or too much clothing, under the parental superintendence of an elderly female who received the culprits at and for the consideration of sevenpence-halfpenny per small head per week.
In reality, the woman siphons off most of the money for herself, starving the children under the pretense that it is bad for them to be overfed or coddled. The Poor Law of 1834 consolidated poor people in workhouses. It aimed both to reduce the state cost of supporting poor people and to encourage poor people to work for a living rather than relying on the state. The passage describing Oliver's entry into this system uses humor to demonstrate that it not only failed poor children and adults, but in fact made them targets of people like this woman, who "serves" Oliver and the other children by saving them from the "inconvenience" of life-sustaining nutrition. In Chapter 12, when Mrs. Bedwin is feeding Oliver, it becomes apparent just how much these children are being starved:
And with this, the old lady applied herself to warming up in a little saucepan a basin full of broth strong enough to furnish an ample dinner, when reduced to the regulation strength, for three hundred and fifty paupers, at the very lowest computation.
The narrator is no doubt exaggerating for comedic effect, but Dickens also sets up the reader to be alarmed. How on earth could a single saucepan of broth, intended for one little boy by a woman who actually wants to nurture him, stretch to feed 350 people? It must be barely more than water at that point. No wonder Oliver asks for more food when he is living in the workhouse.
Dickens uses not only the narrator, but also certain characters' comments to satirize the Poor Laws. In Chapter 19, Sikes laments his loss of a chimney sweep whom he used to employ to slip through small spaces for robberies:
But the father gets lagged, and then the Juvenile Delinquent Society comes, and takes the boy away from a trade where he was arning money, teaches him to read and write, and in time makes a ‘prentice of him.
Although the idea of training a child in an honest trade so that he will stop breaking into houses sounds good, Sikes actually has a point. Readers have seen what happened to Oliver when he was apprenticed with Mr. Sowerberry. Breaking up a family by arresting the parent and placing the child with a master of trade might not produce a better outcome for that child at all. The fact that Sikes—one of the novel's villains—makes a reasonable point emphasizes just how bad the Poor Laws are: even a villain can see that they don't work, and even an apprenticeship to a villain might be better than some standard apprenticeships.

Teacher
Common Core-aligned