In A Journal of the Plague Year, the Great Fire of London—a real, historical event in early September 1666 in which much of central and western London burned—represents different ways that societies can react to major catastrophes despite the catastrophes’ similar effects on individual psychology. When the novel first mentions the Great Fire of 1666, it parallels the Fire with the Great Plague of London by noting that a comet crossed the sky shortly before each disaster and that superstitious Londoners in hindsight interpreted the comets as omens of the catastrophes. Moreover, the novel later notes that both catastrophes caused individual Londoners to “Despair”: at the height of the plague, some Londoners became so convinced they would all die that they stopped taking measures to protect themselves, while during the worst of the fire, many citizens felt their attempts to fight the conflagration were so hopeless that they “gave over their Endeavours to extinguish it” (i.e., stopped trying to put out the flames).
Yet while the two catastrophes may have had similar effects on individual Londoners’ psychologies, leading to superstition and fatalism, the novel notes that the Great Plague and the Great Fire provoked very different large-scale social reactions. During the Plague, relief for poor Londoners (who were at risk of starving due to halted economic activity and widespread unemployment) was haphazard and relied substantially on private charity. By contrast, after the Fire, the government spent large amounts of public money to “re-edify the Buildings” and “beautify the city,” even reallocating money to rebuilding that had originally been intended for London’s orphans. In the same vein, whereas the Plague led people to stop non-essential trade and commerce, London reacted to the Fire with a burst of economic activity, buying an “infinite Quantity” of goods to replace items lost in the fire and spurring a manufacturing boom throughout England. Thus, in the context of the novel’s representation of the Great Plague, the Great Fire by contrast reflects how two catastrophes, occurring in the same place and within months of one another, can provoke starkly different political and social reactions despite their similar effects on the individuals who suffer from them.
The Great Fire Quotes in A Journal of the Plague Year
I shall not be supposed to lessen the Authority or Capacity of the Physicians, when, I say, that the Violence of the Distemper, when it came to its Extremity, was like the Fire the next Year; The Fire which consumed what the Plague could not touch, defy’d all the Application of Remedies; […] They endeavoured to do good, and to save the Lives of others; But we were not to expect, that the Physicians could stop God’s Judgments, or prevent a Distemper eminently armed from heaven, from executing the Errand it was sent about.
It was a great Mistake, that such a great City as this had but one Pest-House […] I say, had there instead of that one been several Pest-Houses, every one able to contain a thousand People without lying two in a Bed, or two Beds in a Room, and had every Master of a Family, as soon as any Servant especially, had been taken sick in his House, been obliged to send them to the next Pest-House, if they were willing, as many were, and had the Examiners done the like among the poor People, when any had been stricken with the Infection; I say, had this been done where the People were willing, (not otherwise) and the Houses not been shut, I am perswaded, and was all the While of that Opinion, that not so many, by several Thousands, had died[.]



