The Uninhabitable Earth

The Uninhabitable Earth

by

David Wallace-Wells

Teachers and parents! Our Teacher Edition on The Uninhabitable Earth makes teaching easy.

The Uninhabitable Earth: Part IV, The Anthropic Principle Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
In spite of the draw of apocalyptic narratives, no one wants to see disaster coming—but climate science has nonetheless predicted that disaster is well on its way. Predictions about sea-level rise and rising global temperatures will soon be put to the test—and the only thing that can falsify those predications is for humanity to change how we behave. In other words, human actions—not climate systems—are what will determine the future.
This section is titled “The Anthropic Principle,” after the idea positing that sentient life isn’t a happy accident of the universe but rather the way the universe is engineered. This passage also frames humanity as a central, vastly important player in a large game. Humans have engineered climate change, and our actions are the only thing that can slow its course at this point.
Themes
Human Responsibility and the Natural World Theme Icon
The Effects of Climate Change on Humanity Theme Icon
Quotes
The earth’s fragile climate system gave rise to humanity, creating an impossibly specific set of circumstances in which life could not just exist but flourish. Ironically, humanity may be what brings itself to an end, squandering the rare opportunity presented by Earth’s improbably hospitable environment.
While human life isn’t necessarily an accident or a fluke, that doesn’t mean it’s not precious and rare—we are, as far as we know, singular. So our undoing through conscious destruction of the one place that seems to be able to support us is all the more tragic and foolish.
Themes
Human Responsibility and the Natural World Theme Icon
The Effects of Climate Change on Humanity Theme Icon
The physicist Enrico Fermi is famous for the concept known as Fermi’s paradox: if the universe is so big, why hasn’t humanity located any other intelligent life forms? Climate may just be the answer. Earth’s climate was inhospitable to human life for most of its history—and in a rare moment of comfort, humanity has taken over. Now, the planet’s climate is quickly reverting to an inhospitable range. The universe is billions of years old, and it’s possible that the lifespan of a civilization is truly only a few thousand years long. Civilizations could’ve risen before on this planet or any other in the universe—but they also could’ve sunk back into nonexistence when their climate filtered them out through mass extinction events.
Fermi’s paradox is an eerie concept. It calls into question whether humans are truly alone in the universe and unique in the history of planet Earth, or whether we are unknowingly repeating a set of circumstances (or a version of a set of circumstances) that has unraveled time and time again, long ago. But this is yet another mechanism through which humans could turn to despair, inaction, or indifference. Thinking that we’re just one of many civilizations that have fallen over the course of Earth’s lifetime threatens our sense of urgency in protecting the planet and ourselves—but thinking that we alone have doomed ourselves to snuffing out the last vestige of sentient life in the universe stands to inspire a different kind of doom and nihilism.
Themes
Human Responsibility and the Natural World Theme Icon
Optimism and Action vs. Despair and Nihilism Theme Icon
The search for other intelligent life in the universe promises to change how humanity conceives of itself. Humankind may be very special—or it might turn out that the human race is much less important than people would like to think. There are many planets throughout the universe that are similar to Earth and could theoretically support life—but no life has been found. Many theories try to explain why this is: it may be that aliens are watching over Earth like spectators at a zoo, or it may be that alien civilizations are in states of suspended sleep, waiting for the universe to evolve, or it may be that aliens have found a way to wall themselves off from discoverability.
There are endless possibilities for why no other intelligent life has made itself known to humanity. But  the book suggests that just because we haven’t yet had contact with other life forms doesn’t mean they aren’t out there—or that they haven’t possibly endured the same struggles and trials we have here on planet Earth.
Themes
Human Responsibility and the Natural World Theme Icon
Get the entire The Uninhabitable Earth LitChart as a printable PDF.
The Uninhabitable Earth PDF
This kind of thinking reframes the Anthropocene entirely. Humans may not be alone—and they likely aren’t the first intelligent life in the universe. It’s possible that entire civilizations have sprung up, thrived, and collapsed—maybe even on planet Earth—thousands or millions of times before. Rather than seeing our insignificance as pathetic, however, many astrophysicists and sociologists suggest it should be an “uplifting” prospect—human civilization and its progress is fragile, and it must be protected. Humanity shouldn’t be “suspicious of our exceptionality”—we should feel empowered by it.
The book once again calls for optimism, hope, and wonder in the face of huge, unanswerable questions about our planet and the universe. Rather than sinking into despair, we should see this moment as an opportunity to harness all of our strength in order to preserve what is very possibly a singular way of life on a totally unique planet. 
Themes
Human Responsibility and the Natural World Theme Icon
Optimism and Action vs. Despair and Nihilism Theme Icon
Seeing ourselves as singular and special might be helpful in focusing collective, global attention on what humanity is doing to the Earth by consciously choosing to destroy it. To “think like a planet”—in other words, to reclaim stewardship of our one precious Earth—is to escape the bounds of neoliberal thought and reframe the human experience entirely. Accepting responsibility for what humanity has done to the Earth is the first step in rising to the threat of climate change.
Rather than thinking small, like we’ve been trained to do by our socioeconomic circumstances, the book posits that we should all be thinking in more expansive terms. Seeing our planet for what it is—a unique and fragile place—will help us to treat one another and nature with more generosity and mindfulness. If we don’t radically reframe our thinking and consider ourselves stewards of a precious planet rather than colonizers or profiteers, it’s certain that all our progress as a species will be lost forever.
Themes
Human Responsibility and the Natural World Theme Icon
Optimism and Action vs. Despair and Nihilism Theme Icon
Quotes
The ravages of climate change are tragic—but humanity has everything we need to reverse course. A carbon tax, a shift away from beef and dairy, and investment in carbon capture could all contribute to salvation for humanity—but whether the world will be able to unite and take these crucial steps remains to be seen. Most likely, some will leap into action while others despair. But no matter how one perceives the climate kaleidoscope—choosing to see the Earth as a life raft, a vengeful monster, or a fragile “Pale Blue Dot”—there is only one planet, and only one chance to save it.
The answers to how to begin combating climate change are all readily apparent. And policymaking at the global or even national level could put many of these defense mechanisms into place easily. But the real test will be whether humanity will be able to reframe our thinking about our own progress as a species—and maintain that foundational change on a long enough timeline to repair some of what has been broken.
Themes
Cascades, Systems Crises, and Interconnectedness Theme Icon
Human Responsibility and the Natural World Theme Icon
Optimism and Action vs. Despair and Nihilism Theme Icon