- All's Well That Ends Well
- Antony and Cleopatra
- As You Like It
- The Comedy of Errors
- Coriolanus
- Cymbeline
- Hamlet
- Henry IV, Part 1
- Henry IV, Part 2
- Henry V
- Henry VI, Part 1
- Henry VI, Part 2
- Henry VI, Part 3
- Henry VIII
- Julius Caesar
- King John
- King Lear
- Love's Labor's Lost
- A Lover's Complaint
- Macbeth
- Measure for Measure
- The Merchant of Venice
- The Merry Wives of Windsor
- A Midsummer Night's Dream
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Othello
- Pericles
- The Rape of Lucrece
- Richard II
- Richard III
- Romeo and Juliet
- Shakespeare's Sonnets
- The Taming of the Shrew
- The Tempest
- Timon of Athens
- Titus Andronicus
- Troilus and Cressida
- Twelfth Night
- The Two Gentlemen of Verona
- Venus and Adonis
- The Winter's Tale
Fadiman’s rumination on Neil’s unwillingness to compromise Lia’s treatment presents a difficult moral choice and suggests the importance of flexibility in the context medical care. It’s noteworthy that he so decisively held to his belief that it was his “job” to “practice good medicine” and that, conversely, it was the Lees’ “job to comply.” As Fadiman later makes clear, the idea of compliance in the medical world implies hierarchies of power in which the doctor is in full control while the patient plays a passive part in his or her own treatment. Although Neil was only doing what he thought…