Love's Labor's Lost

by

William Shakespeare

Teachers and parents! Our Teacher Edition on Love's... makes teaching easy.

Love's Labor's Lost: Satire 2 key examples

Read our modern English translation.
Definition of Satire
Satire is the use of humor, irony, sarcasm, or ridicule to criticize something or someone. Public figures, such as politicians, are often the subject of satire, but satirists can take... read full definition
Satire is the use of humor, irony, sarcasm, or ridicule to criticize something or someone. Public figures, such as politicians, are often the subject of... read full definition
Satire is the use of humor, irony, sarcasm, or ridicule to criticize something or someone. Public figures, such as politicians... read full definition
Act 5, Scene 1
Explanation and Analysis—Holofernes's Complaint:

Holofernes, the pedantic schoolmaster, complains to Nathaniel about Armado’s way of speaking. Holofernes’s complaints satirize a certain attitude towards formal education :

He draweth out the thread of his verbosity                                                                                 
finer than the staple of his argument. I abhor                                                                               
such fanatical phantasimes, such insociable and                                                                              
point-devise companions, such rackers of orthography,                                                     
as to speak “dout,” fine, when he should                                                                                       
say “doubt”; “det” when he should pronounce                                                                     
“debt”—d, e, b, t, not d, et.

Holofernes complains that Armado draws out his arguments for too long. Armado lives in a fantasy world and is unsociable, overly precise, and exacting. For example, he cares too much about spelling (Holofernes offers several examples). Holofernes finishes by saying that Armado’s speech drives him nuts, and he says that Armado is insane (“Ne intelligis, domine? / To make frantic, lunatic”). 

Holofernes ironically complains about several perceived flaws he demonstrates himself, including fastidiousness. Holofernes, too, draws his arguments out at length. Equally, Holofernes is very exacting in his own critique of Armado. Just as he slights the lord for his obsession with spelling, he goes to great lengths to address each of Armado’s spelling mistakes letter by letter. Holofernes complains about Armado’s anti-social behavior while also incorporating Latin into his speech to alienate and intimidate his less well-read listeners.

Holofernes’s pedantic obsession with spelling, incorporation of Latin, and pretentious fault-finding all mock a small-minded attitude toward learning and knowledge. Holofernes takes Ferdinand’s perspective at the play’s beginning and takes it to its absolute end. He values book learning to the exclusion of all else, and he looks down on those who seem less educated. But Holofernes unintentionally reveals the silliness of his own position in this scene, as he criticizes much of the very behavior he exhibits. 

Act 5, Scene 2
Explanation and Analysis—The Nine Worthies:

In this scene, Nathaniel, Holofernes, Mote, Armado, and Costard put on their pageant of the Nine Worthies. The pageant depicts nine great men throughout history, and each man plays several roles. However, each man falls comically short of his assigned parts. Nathaniel’s performance as Alexander the Great satirizes certain ideals of masculinity: 

NATHANIEL
When I lived, I was the world's
    commander.
By east, west, north, and south, I spread my
    conquering might.
My scutcheon plain declares I am Alisander—

BOYET
Your nose says no, you are not, for it stands too right.

BEROWNE, to Boyet
Your nose smells "no" in <this>, most tender-smelling knight.

PRINCESS
The conqueror is dismayed.—Proceed, good Alexander.

Nathaniel introduces himself as the “world’s commander,” a military leader who dominates all corners of the earth. Boyet immediately begins heckling him, pointing out that his nose is too straight to be Alexander’s. Berowne picks up the heckling and adds that Nathaniel smells too bad to be Alexander (in reference to Plutarch’s description of Alexander as “sweet-smelling”). Nathaniel falters and becomes embarrassed, leading the princess to note his discomfort and encourage him.

Many of the men in the play attempt to exude stereotypically masculine qualities of self-control, strength, and power. The men they choose to lionize in their pageant are a reflection of these values (hence the incorporation of Alexander, Julius Caesar, King Arthur, etc.). Nathaniel, however, appears timid and easily thrown off in his role as Alexander. His friends’ (hopefully) good-natured heckling drives him to distraction and eventually leads to him wander offstage. Appearances sit in clear and intentional tension with reality, and normal men are unable to live up to the larger than life construction of masculinity captured in the image of Alexander.

The sharp contrast between the reality of who Nathaniel is, and the figure he is meant to represent, pokes fun at the ideals behind the pageant. The satire continues through the scene as the men stumble through their lines, and even sabotage one another (as when Costard announces that Jacquenetta is pregnant with Armado’s child). The silliness of these ideals is reflected in how impossible they are for the men to perform. 

Unlock with LitCharts A+