A Short History of Nearly Everything

by

Bill Bryson

Teachers and parents! Our Teacher Edition on A Short History of Nearly Everything makes teaching easy.

A Short History of Nearly Everything: Chapter 4 Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
In 1735, a group of French scientists led by Pierre Bouguer and Charles Marie de la Condamine attempt to trek through the Andes Mountains to work out Earth’s circumference by measuring a 200-mile stretch of land near the Equator. The trip is a disaster: the locals pelt the scientists with stones, their doctor is stabbed and killed in a lover’s quarrel, several scientists die of illness, and one runs off with a teenager, never to return. They also have to wait eight months in Lima, Peru for permits, because authorities don’t believe their reasoning for why they need to go all the way to the Andes to do their calculations.
Bryson’s story about Bouguer and Condamine emphasizes how science can be rendered engaging as a human endeavor of discovery, intrigue, and adventure (rather than a dull and lifeless set of theories in a textbook). He also shows that scientific discovery in the 18th century is fraught with obstacles, highlighting another barrier to scientific knowledge that limits the speed of scientific discovery. 
Themes
Science, Discovery, and Mystery Theme Icon
Writing, Wonder, and Inspiration  Theme Icon
The answer to the question of why these scientists need to go to the Equator goes back to Edmond Halley, a sea captain, scientist, and mathematician who makes many inventions and scientific contributions in his lifetime (the famed Halley’s Comet is named after him). After making a dinner bet in 1638, Halley becomes obsessed with finding out why Earth’s orbit is elliptical, and he seeks out Isaac Newton’s advice. Newton tells Halley that he’s actually already figured out why the orbit is elliptical—but he forgot where he wrote down the explanation. Bryson says that this is like finding a cure for cancer and forgetting where you noted it down. On Halley’s pressing, Newton sits down to recalculate the formula and ends up writing and publishing a book called Principia, which changes the face of science forever.
Once again, Bryson works up to Newton’s discovery of gravity and the laws of motion with engaging personal details about Halley and Newton, emphasizing the human context around Newton’s work. Bryson also uses humor to render stories about scientific discovery more engaging, for example, when describing Newton’s eccentric behavior. For Bryson, these sorts of descriptions help readers to absorb and retain scientific information and to become genuinely curious about the nature of Newton’s claims.
Themes
Writing, Wonder, and Inspiration  Theme Icon
Newton’s book identifies the laws of motion and it contains the discovery of gravity. The laws of motion are: (1) an object moves in same the direction toward which it’s pushed, (2) an object will move in a straight line if undisturbed by other forces, (3) every action has an equal and opposite reaction, and (4) every object in the universe pulls others toward it. This fourth law means that every object has a gravitational pull that’s proportional to its mass and the inverse of the squared distance from the object it pulls. This means that if the distance between two objects is doubled, the gravitational pull between them becomes four times weaker. Controversially, Principia also claims that Earth is a slightly squashed sphere—slightly flatter at the poles but wider at the Equator. 
Having peaked the reader’s curiosity, Bryson now explains the central tenets of Newton’s laws of motion. Bryson thinks that nesting scientific theories and laws (like these one) in human contexts helps the reader to retain the information being absorbed. Bryson is also careful to use simple language and clear example, so that the writing is clear and easy to absorb, which is another quality he believes is important to scientific writing.
Themes
Writing, Wonder, and Inspiration  Theme Icon
If Newton is right, it means that prior calculations about Earth’s circumference and mass are wrong, because, up until this point, scientists assumed that Earth was a perfect sphere. Robert Norwood makes one such calculation a few years earlier by walking 208 miles from the Tower of London to York measuring the distance on the ground with a chain. Norwood wants to know the width (or circumference) on Earth’s surface that one degree of a circle captures, if that degree were to originate from Earth’s center and extend out toward the surface (like a slice of pie). Norwood calculates this distance as 110.72 kilometers, while French astronomer also Jean Picard uses a different geometric method to estimate slightly more accurately that it’s 110.46 kilometers.
Bryson’s next move is to apply Newton’s laws to a tangible problem (such as Earth’s shape) to show how abstract theories engage with real-world inquiry. Thus, Bryson emphasizes the connection—rather than the distance—between science and human curiosity. Norwood’s quest to estimate the circumference of a degree arc is similarly imbedded in memorable details like his use of a chain. Norwood’s effort also emphasizes the challenges to scientific knowledge faced by early scientists given a lack of technology, which implies that there’s always more scientific work to be done as measuring tools improve.
Themes
Science, Discovery, and Mystery Theme Icon
Writing, Wonder, and Inspiration  Theme Icon
Get the entire A Short History of Nearly Everything LitChart as a printable PDF.
A Short History of Nearly Everything PDF
In 1669, however, father and son team Giovanni and Jacques Cassini dispute Newton’s claim that Earth is slightly flattened (like a tangerine) and argue that it’s actually slightly elongated (like an egg). To settle the dispute, two expeditions are sent off from France: one (led by Bouguer and Condamine) to measure the circumference of a degree at the Equator and another to Scandinavia to measure the circumference of a degree near the North Pole. If the circumference of a degree at the Equator is longer than elsewhere, Newton’s hypothesis is correct. Nine-and-a-half grueling years later, Bouguer and Condamine discover that Newton was indeed right. Even worse for them, the French team trekking in Scandinavia worked it out and beat them to the punch.
Bryson completes the tale of the expedition, thus bookending Newton’s theory in a tangible human story, once again using humor and irony to render ideas (here, about Earth’s shape and circumference) more memorable. The grueling nature of such expeditions emphasizes that early scientific discovery is fraught with obstacles. Bryson thus implies that one of the reasons why scientific knowledge is still in its infancy is because it simply takes a lot of effort to learn things about the world in this stage of history.
Themes
Science, Discovery, and Mystery Theme Icon
Writing, Wonder, and Inspiration  Theme Icon
Newton also argues in Principia that a plumb bomb hung near a mountain will tilt toward the mountain, which Nevile Maskelyne and Charles Mason attempt to prove in the 1770s. Ten years earlier, however, they have a different challenge: to measure the passage of Venus across the sun (known as a “transit”) so that they can calculate Venus’s distance from the sun.  Halley had wanted to do that himself, but Venus didn’t transit in his lifetime. Venus’s peculiar orbit means that the planet passes across the sun (or “transits”), then passes again eight years later, but then it disappears for 125 years.
Bryson stresses that our knowledge of many things—particularly cosmic events—is limited because of the narrow chances of witnessing cosmic events in the flesh. These kinds of natural limitations show that scientific discovery is at the mercy of cosmic timing, and that there are likely many cosmic events humans have yet to witness, and that we’ve therefore yet to acquire scientific knowledge about.
Themes
Science, Discovery, and Mystery Theme Icon
One of the first international collaborative scientific efforts was a series of expeditions across the world to measure the transit of Venus from multiple places. The expeditions, however, are ill-fated. Jeanne Chappe’s journey to Siberia is halted by a flooded river just before he reaches his destination, and Guillame Le Gentil travels a year to India only to have a cloud block the transit from view at just the wrong moment. Another ship, carrying Charles Mason and Jeremiah Dixon (who famously plot the Mason-Dixon line in the American wilderness a few years later) is attacked by the French before they reach their destination in Sumatra.
Bryson’s story about the ill-fated effort to measure the transit of Venus shows once again how scientific discovery is often stymied by everyday obstacles like bad weather. His inclusion of this story again shows how much effort and how many people are involved in making scientific claims, emphasizing how chance circumstances can impede the speed of scientific discovery. It also once again situates a scientific claim in an intriguing story of human adventure, thus fostering curiosity and engagement in the reader.
Themes
Science, Discovery, and Mystery Theme Icon
Writing, Wonder, and Inspiration  Theme Icon
Eventually, Maskeleyne’s team—who compare the various measurements of Venus’s transit—conclude the 1761 effort failed due to too many conflicting measurements. Eight years later, in 1769, British explorer James Cook completes the task from Tahiti, before claiming Australia as a British colony. Using Cook’s measurements of Venus’s transit, a French astronomer named Joseph Lalande calculates that Earth is 150 million kilometers from the sun.
Maskeleyne’s analysis shows that scientific claims often involve the interpretation of conflicting, partial, or inadequate data, leaving a lot of room for error. Bryson thus stresses how scientists can think they’ve figured something out before learning that their knowledge is incorrect and requires further inquiry.
Themes
Science, Discovery, and Mystery Theme Icon
Once that issue is resolved, Maskeleyne turns back to the issue of plumb bombs tilting toward mountains. In 1774, he makes a lengthy survey—full of complicated measurements—of Scotland’s Schiehallion mountain to test Newton’s hypothesis. Maskeleyne’s measurements prove essential to the ongoing quest to figure out Earth’s mass: Charles Hutton ends up using them to estimate Earth’s mass (at 5,000 million million tons) and to deduce the mass of the sun and other planets. Incidentally, he also invents contour lines (which connect points of equal height on a mountain) when he makes a diagram of Maskeleyne’s measurements. 
Bryson implies that scientific experiments often have a broader potential for knowledge than is initially apparent. Here, Maskeleyne’s effort to test Newton’s hypothesis about gravity ends up helping Hutton to make progress in another scientific quest (about Earth’s mass). This is one of the reasons why Bryson thinks scientific claims should be articulated in accessible ways: they might have hidden potential that would remain inaccessible if the findings are not expressed well enough for others to use.
Themes
Writing, Wonder, and Inspiration  Theme Icon
Twenty-three years later, a pathologically shy Henry Cavendish (who is terrified of people looking at him or speaking to him in public and only communicates with his household servants through notes) figures out a more accurate measurement of Earth’s mass. He estimates it to be six billion trillion metric tons (each metric ton weighs 1000 kilograms), which he deduces using a curious machine invented by a country parson named John Michell, who leaves it to Cavendish in his will.
John Michell is an amateur who isn’t professionally trained in science, but he invents a machine with profound scientific potential out of sheer personal curiosity. Through this example, Bryson further underscores the need for science to engage everyone (not just esoteric scientists), because breakthroughs can come from anyone if they are curious and engaged enough to think about scientific problems.
Themes
Writing, Wonder, and Inspiration  Theme Icon
Incidentally, Cavendish also discovers at least five scientific laws later coined by other scientists, as well as electrical conductivity and a way to discover the noble gases. However, Cavendish is too shy to publish his findings in his lifetime. Despite vast advances in technology, no scientist has since improved upon Cavendish’s 1797 measurements. Bryson says that by the late 1700s, we thus knew Earth’s precise dimensions and accurate distances between the planets and the sun.
Bryson reemphasizes the import of Michell’s contribution to science as an engaged amateur, since his machine enables the most accurate measurement of Earth’s mass to date. Bryson also shows that it takes the better part of a century to figure out the solar system and Earth’s dimensions, indicating that scientific mysteries take a long time to solve. The multigenerational nature of scientific discovery shows that there is always more scientific work to be done and more progress to be made.  
Themes
Science, Discovery, and Mystery Theme Icon
Writing, Wonder, and Inspiration  Theme Icon