On the Genealogy of Morals
by Friedrich Nietzsche

The Repression of Human Nature Theme Analysis

Themes and Colors
Good and Evil Theme Icon
The Repression of Human Nature Theme Icon
Art, Beauty, and Emotions  Theme Icon
LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in On the Genealogy of Morals, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
The Repression of Human Nature Theme Icon
The Repression of Human Nature Theme Icon

In On the Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche argues that Christian values have corrupted European society and triggered a regressive cultural crisis in late 19th-century Europe. Nietzsche believes that humans are innate predators, but modern European society doesn’t offer a healthy outlet for people’s violent predatory instincts—essentially, human beings’ primal need to feel the satisfaction of exerting power over their prey. To Nietzsche, the “ascetic” ideology of Judeo-Christian doctrine—centering on “poverty, chastity, and humility,” or practicing restraint from life’s pleasures—masks a perversion of human culture that makes it profoundly sick. To Nietzsche, most aspects of modern European human culture—including religion, philosophy, science, and law—aren’t progressive but merely express the sadistic human urge for power and ultimately make people suffer. Nietzsche thus argues that European culture is in crisis because the Christian values on which its founded don’t allow people to experience joy in living as we are meant to and instead forces us to manifest our inherent sadistic impulses in harmful ways.

Nietzsche believes that humankind has an innate drive to feel powerful, which is a part of our survival instinct. Prior to large societies, human beings had to hunt, kill, roam, and conquer territory in order to survive. But Nietzsche is clear that there’s nothing wrong with this—human beings are simply hardwired to thrive off of conflict and cruelty, because it keeps us alive in the harsh, predatory natural world. Nietzsche argues that the primal human is a “beast of prey”: we are hardwired to be predatory as a means of survive. Hunting and killing are essentially cruel behaviors, but without such instincts, humans wouldn’t have survived the early days of our existence. Early humans were also “nomadic,” instinctively seizing and protecting territory to survive. When people form small, isolated societies, they still practice “murder, arson, rape, and torture” outside the domain of their own territory, which are manifestations of an innate drive for violence and power. Historically, humankind thought there was nothing immoral about possessing these power-driven instincts. In fact, expressing such instincts give people a profound feeling of “joy” and “freedom” in acting true to ourselves. But Nietzsche notes that many powerful people in modern Europe assume that recent human civilization has triumphed by “taming” our “animal” selves (and our violent lust for power). To Nietzsche, this is a lie, because our instincts can’t be changed. Instinctive, predatory human tendencies to express power, violence, and cruelty only become more dangerous to humanity when we try to suppress them.

Nietzsche argues that modern European culture, which centers on Christian values of “poverty, chastity, and humility,” doesn’t have healthy outlets for humankind’s predatory, sadistic impulses, so these impulses inevitably emerge in more damaging ways. In Nietzsche’s view, the law was originally designed to allow people to live full and active lives and carve out areas where conflict and aggression were permissible—but the modern European conceptions of justice exert “vengeance” on criminals in far more damaging ways. The European legal system is based on ideas of credit and debt, meaning that a person who breaks a law owes a debt to society—and justice is characterized as a legal right to inflict pain on the criminal in equal proportion to the debt owed. To Nietzsche, such a practice is evidence of the sadistic impulse in humankind emerging as resentful vengeance rather than healthy conflict. Christian religious leaders—or “ascetic priests”—promise to help those who suffer, but Nietzsche argues that they only cause more suffering as their followers deny their natural instincts. Essentially, ascetic priests exert power by falsely depicting themselves as healers who will lead others to “bliss” in the afterlife. Nietzsche believes that practicing the “ascetic ideology” of Christian values makes people suffer, because it forces them to feel guilty every time they feel their natural aggressive urges. Such people believe that they are evil, or sinful, for being human and having a natural instinct to exert power and thrive in the world. In exerting power, the ascetic priest feels a sense of mastery, which brings them joy—but their followers perpetually suffer because they believe that their inevitable instincts to exert power are evil, meaning they feel perpetually “unworthy.”

Even many nonreligious thinkers (such as secular philosophers) embody the “ascetic ideal,” arguing that humans are at their best when they use their rationality and suppress their “animalistic” emotional and bodily feelings. Such practices appeal to philosophers because they enjoy thinking and therefore want to rid themselves of distractions like commerce and romance. The desire to feel mastery over their emotions allows philosophers to exert their power (over emotional and bodily “distractions” in life), and they feel happy in being able to do so. As such, they tend to argue that cultivating “reason” is fundamentally better than getting bogged down in the messy emotional encounters of life. For many people, however, the same practices of restraint from life’s daily pleasures only make them deny the aspects of life that will actually make them happy and fulfilled.

Nietzsche believes that we would experience life with profound “joy” if we accepted that we simply are power-driven beings, and we cultivated healthy public outlets to manage our innate desire for conflict and violence. Nietzsche argues that some historical cultures, like the Ancient Greeks, recognized and even embraced the “beast of prey” in humankind and were thus more progressive than modern Europeans. The Ancient Greeks provided healthy public outlets—like “war,” “violent festivities,” and public executions—for humans to express the cruel aspects of our nature. Harsh as they seem, Nietzsche believes that such “bizarre cruelties” are actually beneficial because they allow us to feel a healthy “joy” in expressing our natural instincts. Modern European culture—which has no such outlets—forces people to turn their instinctual cruelty inward on themselves. Instead of being expressed and released, this self-directed cruelty festers and continues unchecked, which causes great “pain” and “misery.” Thus, contrary to the modern belief that Christian morality is progressive, Nietzsche argues that modern European culture founded on this value system is actually regressive and damaging to humanity.

Related Themes from Other Texts
Compare and contrast themes from other texts to this theme…

The Repression of Human Nature ThemeTracker

The ThemeTracker below shows where, and to what degree, the theme of The Repression of Human Nature appears in each chapter of On the Genealogy of Morals. Click or tap on any chapter to read its Summary & Analysis.
How often theme appears:
chapter length:
Get the entire On the Genealogy of Morals LitChart as a printable PDF.
"My students can't get enough of your charts and their results have gone through the roof." -Graham S.
On the Genealogy of Morals PDF

The Repression of Human Nature Quotes in On the Genealogy of Morals

Below you will find the important quotes in On the Genealogy of Morals related to the theme of The Repression of Human Nature.

Preface Quotes

[U]nder what conditions did man invent for himself those judgements of value, Good and Evil? And what intrinsic value do they possess in themselves? Have they up to the present advanced human welfare, or rather have they harmed our race? Are they a symptom of distress, impoverishment and degeneration of life? Or, conversely do we find in them an expression of the abundant vitality and vigour of life, its courage, its self-confidence, its future?

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 5
Explanation and Analysis:
As Nietzsche begins On the Genealogy of Morals, he raises several questions. These form the crux of his inquiry and hint at his overall argument: Nietzsche wants to know how popular conceptions of “Good” and “Evil” formed in human history. From this, it’s evident that Nietzsche thinks moral codes are a human invention, and he wants to study their use over time in order to see how they’ve evolved. This task—of looking at the meaning and use of a concept through human history—is called “genealogy,” which is why Nietzsche entitles his book On the Genealogy of Morals.  In his subsequent Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenet

Good and Evil, Good and Bad Quotes

The knightly-aristocratic values rest upon a powerful physical development, a richness and even superabundance of health, together with what is necessary for maintaining life, on war, adventure, the chase, the dance, the journey—on everything, in fact, which involves strong, free and joyous action.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 21
Explanation and Analysis:
Nietzsche has just argued that ancient European cultures had a different moral code than modern European culture. Here, he characterizes the defining elements of what it means to be “good” in a pre-Christian European culture, say, Ancient Greece or Rome. Nietzsche thinks that in a society in which warriors or knights are powerful, the populace will strive to achieve physical strength, material wealth, combat, and adventure. Nietzsche finds this approach to morality constructive for the wellbeing of a culture because he thinks it encourages people to express—rather than repress—their natural human instincts. For Nietzsche, ancient humans were nomadic predators, meaning Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. No

The slaves' revolt in morality begins when resentment itself becomes creative and gives birth to values—a resentment experienced by those who, deprived as they are of the proper outlet of action, are forced to obtain their satisfaction in imaginary acts of vengeance. While all aristocratic morality springs from a triumphant affirmation of its own demands, the slave morality says ‘no’ ab initio to what is ‘outside itself,’ ‘different from itself’ and ‘not itself;’ and this ‘no’ is its creative act […] its action is fundamentally a reaction.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker), Jesus of Nazareth
Page Number and Citation: 25
Explanation and Analysis:
Nietzsche has just described the moral code that prevails in societies like Ancient Greece and Rome, in which warriors are the privileged classes. Now, he describes how a rival morality—specifically, Christian values, or priestly morality, as Nietzsche calls it—emerges from a warrior-based culture. Nietzsche argues that oppressed people in such cultures (like Jesus of Nazareth) feel resentful because they are not free to fight, explore, exert power, and feel joy. As a result, they start to characterize their oppressors as “evil” and reframe “good” to align with their own behavior, which is meek, patient, humble, and obedient. Nietzsche finds this Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earu

What is it precisely which I find intolerable? That which I cannot deal with alone, which makes me choke and faint? Bad air! Bad air! That something foul comes near me; that I must inhale the putrid odour of the entrails of a rotten soul!

Nietzsche uses this metaphor because he believes that the prevailing moral code in modern Europe characterizes aggression and power-seeking behavior as evil. To Nietzsche, however, these are fundamental aspects of human nature inherited by modern people from our ancient ancestors (predators who instinctively derived satisfaction from hunting and killing). He thinks that modern European culture forces people to repress their aggressive instincts, which makes them suffer, and that this suffering prevents them from thriving and experiencing life with joy and stunts humanity. He symbolizes this stultification by imagining that Europe isn’t full of healthy, happy people who are actively living as fully realized human beings. Instead, it’s full of people who are forced to hold back a part of themselves, so they aren’t really living but suffering and dying, and their corpses are giving off “bad air.” The metaphor of bad air thus represents humanity’s regression or decline in modern Europe.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker), Jesus of Nazareth
Related Symbols: Bad Air
Page Number and Citation: 31
Explanation and Analysis:
Nietzsche has just described the historical prevalence of a warrior-based moral code in ancient societies and the development of a rival moral code among oppressed people in such societies (through the experiences of oppressed people like Jesus of Nazareth). Now, he fast-forwards about 2,000 years to the late 19th-century European culture of his own time, which has been heavily influenced by Christian morality. Nietzsche uses a controversial metaphor to describe the vibe in European culture in this time: he says it smells like “bad air,” meaning the stench that rotting corpses give off. 

Beyond Good and Evil—at any rate that is not the same as ‘Beyond Good and Bad.’

In Ancient Greece and Rome, there’s no real concept of evil. A person is “good” if they are free to embrace their human instincts and pursue strength, power, and joy. A person who’s not able to do so is simply unlucky: they’re not endowed with social privilege, or they’ve been bewitched by the gods, or they’re a bit foolish. In that sense, there’s no such thing as a fundamentally evil person, or fundamentally evil behavior. The opposite of being good is more like being less good—or “Bad”—as in worse off. However, when oppressed people develop their rival moral code, they characterize their oppressors as fundamentally evil for being strong, powerful, aggressive, and experiencing joy from such behavior. Thus, the concept of “evil” enters the picture. So, going “Beyond Good and Evil” means going beyond a way of seeing natural, human power-seeking behavior as “evil” in and of itself. This is what Nietzsche longs for in his own culture.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 41
Explanation and Analysis:
Nietzsche concludes his first essay by quoting the title of one of his other books that also addresses morality, Beyond Good and Evil. Here, he uses the title to explain a fundamental difference between ancient European morality (warrior-based moral codes that prevailed in Ancient Greece and Rome) and modern European morality (priestly moral codes that became dominant after the birth of Christianity).

Guilt, Bad Conscience, and Related Matters Quotes

The breeding of an animal that is free to make promises—is not this precisely the paradoxical task which nature has set for itself in regard to man? Is not this the essential problem of man?

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 43
Explanation and Analysis:
Nietzsche begins his second essay by looking at the importance of making and keeping promises in modern (meaning late 19th-century) European culture. In other words, in order for a person to know that they can keep a promise, they have to have a reliable conception of how they will act in the future, so that they can vouch for their future self when making a promise. To Nietzsche, this a skill that needs to be cultivated in humans. Nietzsche will shortly argue that social customs train people to act consistently in a society, which enables them to keep promises. To Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. V

How much blood and cruelty lies at the foundation of all ‘good things!’

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 48
Explanation and Analysis:
Nietzsche concludes his section about social conditioning, guilty conscience, and punishment with this quote. Many of Nietzsche’s contemporaries consider it a mark of pride and freedom to successfully master social customs like keeping promises. Nietzsche, however, thinks that social conditioning is much more sinister. He argues that punishment tends to function like compensation in European culture. A person who breaks a promise (the debtor) fails to deliver some satisfaction or benefit to the person who was expecting something from them (the creditor). Punishment entitles the creditor to seek an equal amount of an alternative form of satisfaction—namely, the satisfaction of Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam. Aliquid iste enim. Sequi aut maxime. Adipisci voluptate et. Voluptas suscipit alias. In et eveniet. Eaque et repellendus. Dolores aut voluptatibus. Voluptatem qui voluptatum. Voluptatibus sed placeat. Aut tenetur autem. Fugit voluptates in. Quidem impedit sunt. Excepturi ullam nobis. Ducimus odio quo. Ut autem harum. Omnis

Enmity, cruelty, the delight in persecution, in attack, destruction, pillage—the turning of all these instincts against their very owners is the origin of the ‘bad conscience.’

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 70
Explanation and Analysis:
Nietzsche has just discussed the regressive aspects of public social conditioning mechanisms in modern Europe, particularly the justice system. Now, he shifts his attention to the damaging psychological effects of living in European culture in his time. Once again, Nietzsche emphasizes that human beings are hardwired to derive satisfaction from aggressive or cruel (predatory) behavior, because we are—like many other animals in nature—predators. Modern European culture, however, depicts aggression as “evil” and aims to minimize conflict, which makes people want to rid themselves of aggressive thoughts and behaviors. Nietzsche thinks that people who try to erase their aggressive tendencies actually Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligend

Indebtedness to God: this thought becomes his instrument of torture.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 78
Explanation and Analysis:
Nietzsche spends the final sections of his “Second Essay” talking about the psychological effects of religion—specifically, the Christian notion of God—on a person’s wellbeing. Nietzsche has already argued that people suffer tremendously in European culture, because the Christian moral code advocates patience, humility, kindness, and love but demonizes aggression as sinful. To Nietzsche, aggression is a natural human instinct that was inherited from our ancestors, who were once predators in the wild. Nietzsche thinks that modern people tend to internalize or repress their predatory instincts, torturing themselves (rather than their prey) for having cruel, violent, or aggressive aspects to their Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur

What Do Ascetic Ideals Mean? Quotes

What is the meaning of ascetic ideals?

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker), Arthur Schopenhauer , Ascetic priest, Richard Wagner , Immanuel Kant
Page Number and Citation: 83
Explanation and Analysis:
Nietzsche opens his third and final essay with the question he’s going to answer throughout the remainder of the book. As he indicates in framing his question, he’s focusing on “ascetic ideals”: values that advocate maintaining distance from emotional, bodily, and materialistic urges. Nietzsche’s concern isn’t so much with what ascetic ideals are, but what they mean for a culture. Nietzsche aims to show that the ascetic ideal—the idea that distancing oneself from everyday life is meaningful—is pervasive in European culture and that its impact is disastrous for humanity. He’s going to show—by looking at intellectual figures like Wagner, Kant, Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusan

Every animal […] strives instinctively after the most favourable conditions: those under which it can exert its full strength, and experience its greatest feeling of power; every animal also instinctively abhors (and with an acute sense ‘surpassing all reason’) any kind of disruption or hindrance which obstructs or could obstruct his path to this optimum (it is not his way to ‘happiness’ of which I speak, but his path to power, to action, the most powerful action, and in point of fact in many cases his way to misery).

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker), Immanuel Kant , Arthur Schopenhauer
Page Number and Citation: 93
Explanation and Analysis:
Nietzsche is concluding his discussion about art. He has just dismissed both Kant and Schopenhauer’s views, which respectively emphasize emotionally distant or emotionally calming aspects of the experience. Nietzsche has already disagreed with both of them because he thinks many people are drawn to art’s emotionally engaging and stimulating aspects. Extending from Kant and Schopenhauer to philosophers in general, here Nietzsche argues that philosophers mistakenly think a distanced approach to life is objectively better than a subjective, emotionally engaged approach. Such philosophers assume that they gain an intellectual advantage from being distanced, but to Nietzsche, it’s more like philosophers personally Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam. Aliq

We know the three great catch-words of the ascetic ideal: poverty, humility chastity; and if we look closely at the lives of all the great productive, creative intellects, we will find these present again and again, in some measure.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker), Immanuel Kant , Arthur Schopenhauer
Page Number and Citation: 94
Explanation and Analysis:
Nietzsche has just looked at European art and philosophy (especially the intellectual views of Kant and Schopenhauer). He’s about to shift to other aspects of European culture and pauses here to explicitly connect the ascetic ideal with Christian religious views. In general, ascetic ideals are values that endorse stepping back from emotional, bodily, and materialistic urges in life. To Nietzsche, the ascetic approach to life is most evident in Christian doctrine. He thinks the mantra of “poverty, humility, chastity,” encapsulates the ascetic ideal. A person who champions poverty shuns materialistic desires like wealth. A person who believes in humility shuns Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. M

There is only a seeing from a perspective, only a ‘knowing’ from a perspective, and the more emotions we express concerning a thing, the more eyes, different eyes, we train on the same thing, the more complete will be our ‘idea’ of that thing, our ‘objectivity.’

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker), Immanuel Kant
Page Number and Citation: 106
Explanation and Analysis:
Nietzsche is discussing intellectual scholarship in Europe. According to Nietzsche, most philosophers assume that stepping back from life and looking at it from a distance will give them a more objective vantage point, which will enable them to say general or universal things. Nietzsche thinks that this is a mistake—he argues that it’s impossible to step out of one’s own perspective. Even in stepping back, philosophers are still seeing things from their point of view. So to Nietzsche, it’s nonsensical to think that stepping back or distancing oneself from life’s messy bits (or trying to eliminate those aspects) somehow makes Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque place

Look into the background of every family, of every institution, of every community; you will see everywhere the struggle of the sick against the healthy[.]

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Related Symbols: Sickness and Health
Page Number and Citation: 110
Explanation and Analysis:
Nietzsche is discussing the state of European culture as a whole, and he invokes the metaphors of sickness and health to describe the population of Europe. For Nietzsche, a “sick” person (or culture) experiences life in a way that makes them feel worse. A “healthy” person (or culture), in contrast, experiences life in a way that enhances their wellbeing. Nietzsche thinks that most people in Europe are “sick,” and that the culture is therefore “sick” overall. Nietzsche argues that the prevailing moral code in 19th-century Europe tries to distance people from their animal urges. He thinks the culture generally rejects Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum.

‘I suffer: someone is to blame’—all sick sheep think this. But his shepherd, the ascetic priest, says to him, ‘Quite so, my sheep, it must be the fault of someone but you yourself are that someone, you alone are to blame—you yourself are to blame for yourself;’ that is bold enough, false enough, but one thing is at least attained thereby, as I have said: resentment is—diverted.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker), Ascetic priest
Related Symbols: Sickness and Health
Page Number and Citation: 114
Explanation and Analysis:
Nietzsche is discussing the role of religion in European culture. His main target is the “ascetic priest,” whom he characterizes as anybody who advocates ascetic ideals: holding back from emotional, bodily, and materialistic desires. In a religious context, the Christian priest embodies this role. To Nietzsche, priests tell their followers (“sheep”) to strive for humility, chastity, and poverty—priests effectively think that humility is good while being too emotional or egotistical is sinful. Priests also think that chastity is good, while sensual desires are sinful. Finally, they think that poverty (or charity) is good, so materialistic urges are also sinful. Nietzsche Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendi

The hypnotic sensation of nothingness, the peace of deepest sleep, anaesthesia in short—this is regarded by the sufferers and the absolutely depressed as their supreme good[.]

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker), Ascetic priest
Page Number and Citation: 119-120
Explanation and Analysis:
Nietzsche has spent most of his “Third Essay” discussing why ascetic ideals—which advocate withdrawing from everyday life’s ups-and-downs—are problematic because they make people suffer. Here, he acknowledges that there are spiritual leaders in other cultures who actually do use ascetic ideals to reduce their suffering. This means that to Nietzsche, ascetic ideals aren’t bad in themselves, they’re just misapplied in a Christian context. Some spiritual people devote years to training themselves to achieve emotional distance from life. If they succeed, they may well experience a “hypnotic sensation of nothingness”—a mental space that is beyond emotions, and therefore beyond experiences of Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accu

Man will desire oblivion rather than not desire at all.

Related Characters: Friedrich Nietzsche (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 145
Explanation and Analysis:
Nietzsche concludes On the Genealogy of Morals with this line, wryly summing up the argument he’s been making along. Nietzsche has argued that the ascetic ideal—which advocates withdrawing from emotional, bodily, and materialistic aspects of life, or freeing oneself from all personal desires—is pervasive in European culture and that its influence makes people suffer. To Nietzsche, denying feelings, bodily urges, and personal goals is like denying human nature. In Nietzsche’s view, the human experience is driven by desire: the desire to feel things, satisfy urges, seek power, thrive, and experience joy. People uphold the ascetic ideal (or try to suppress Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa