Six Characters in Search of an Author
by Luigi Pirandello

or to save your progress

Six Characters in Search of an Author Quotes

Need another quote?
Need analysis on another quote?
Need analysis for a quote we don't cover?
Need analysis for a quote we don't cover?
Need analysis for a quote we don't cover?
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
Request it
Request it
Request analysis
Request analysis
Request analysis

Act 1 Quotes

Ridiculous? Ridiculous? Is it my fault if France won’t send us any more good comedies, and we are reduced to putting on Pirandello’s works, where nobody understands anything, and where the author plays the fool with us all?

Related Characters: The Manager (speaker), The Leading Man
Page Number and Citation: 2
Explanation and Analysis:
At the beginning of Six Characters in Search of an Author, the Manager leads his group of actors through a rehearsal of a fictional Pirandello play called “Mixing it Up.” The Leading Man has to put on a chef’s hat and complains that this is a “ridiculous” prop, but the Manager counters that the entire situation of the acting company is what is truly “ridiculous.” They are being forced to put on a play they do not particularly like by a dramatist they do not particularly believe in; despite all their later claims about acting’s importance as a serious art Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam. Aliquid iste enim. Sequi aut maxime. Adipisci voluptate et. Voluptas suscipit alias. In et eveniet. Eaque et repellendus. Dolores aut voluptatibu

“The empty form of reason without the fullness of instinct, which is blind.”—You stand for reason, your wife is instinct. It’s a mixing up of the parts, according to which you who act your own part become the puppet of yourself. Do you understand?

Related Characters: The Manager (speaker), The Leading Lady , The Leading Man
Related Literary Devices:
Page Number and Citation: 2
Explanation and Analysis:
As they continue to rehearse “Mixing it Up,” the Manager tells the Actors about the fundamental meaning of their parts. Specifically, he tells the Leading Man that he represents “reason” and the Leading Lady “instinct.” This is a suspiciously accurate description of the Father and the Mother who soon walk onstage. The Father is adamantly and annoyingly intellectual, often so caught up in obsessive philosophizing that he ignores the reactions and emotions of everyone around him and ends up creating an egotistical spectacle rather than truly making amends for his actions, as he professes to want to do. On the Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam. Aliquid iste enim. Sequi aut maxime. Adipisci voluptate et. Voluptas suscipit alias. In et eveniet. Eaque et repellendus. Dolores aut voluptatibus. Voluptatem qui voluptatum. Voluptatibus sed placeat. A

A tenuous light surrounds them, almost as if irradiated by them—the faint breath of their fantastic reality.
This light will disappear when they come forward towards the actors. They preserve, however, something of the dream lightness in which they seem almost suspended; but this does not detract from the essential reality of their forms and expressions.

Related Characters: The Son, The Manager, The Door-Keeper, The Child, The Boy, The Father, The Mother, The Step-Daughter
Page Number and Citation: 3
Explanation and Analysis:
The Manager and Actors’ rehearsal of “Mixing it Up” is abruptly interrupted when the door opens and the Door-Keeper announces the entrance of the Six Characters. These are the stage directions that govern how the Characters walk onstage and approach the Manager: they appear radiating a halo of light, which points to the fact that they are have stepped from fiction onto the stage. They are neither completely of this world nor completely alien to it—and yet, while their origin is uncertain, their existence in the world is anything but, which is what makes their inexplicable appearance onstage so eerie. Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis c

The FATHER (coming forward a little, followed by the others who seem embarrassed). As a manner of fact… we have come here in search of an author…
The MANAGER (half angry, half amazed). An author? What author?
The FATHER. Any author, sir.
The MANAGER. But there’s no author here.

Related Characters: The Father (speaker), The Manager (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 4
Explanation and Analysis:
When the Father first makes his appeal for an author (and explicitly gestures to the play’s title), the Manager is understandably confused—the Father’s request is silly and inexplicable. The theater needs a director to function, not an author. And besides, who needs to search for an author when they can simply be their own? As in so many other moments throughout the play, however, the Manager’s response here plays double duty: beyond his literal meaning (that no experienced playwright is in the theater, including specifically the author of the play they are rehearsing, Pirandello), he also sets out one of Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusa

No, excuse me, I meant it for you, sir, who were crying out that you had no time to lose with madmen, while no one better than yourself knows that nature uses the instrument of human fantasy in order to pursue her high creative purpose.

Related Characters: The Father (speaker), The Manager
Page Number and Citation: 5
Explanation and Analysis:
After the Manager dismisses the Father and his family as “mad people” who have wandered into the theater to disrupt his rehearsal, the Father turns the tables on him and argues that the Manager and his Actors are, in fact, the “madmen.” The whole point of theater, he argues, is to perform an unreality, to reenact something that never happened, and to turn fantasy (or imagination, or madness) into reality. For the Characters to appear in the play is therefore just like for the Actors to appear as characters before their audiences—and both are equally noble pursuits of “high creative Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscip

The author who created us alive no longer wished, or was no longer able, materially to put us into a work of art. And this was a real crime, sir; because he who has had the luck to be born a character can laugh even at death. He cannot die. The man, the writer, the instrument of the creation will die, but his creation does not die. And to live for ever, it does not need to have extraordinary gifts or to be able to work wonders. Who was Sancho Panza? Who was Don Abbondio? Yet they live eternally because—live germs as they were—they had the fortune to find a fecundating matrix, a fantasy which could raise and nourish them: make them live for ever!

Related Characters: The Father (speaker), The Manager
Page Number and Citation: 5-6
Explanation and Analysis:
The Father explains how he and his fellow Characters have come into being: an author birthed them through an act of creative imagination, but then decided never to write them into any story. At this point, however, the Characters’ existence no longer depended on the will of their author: once created, they were real entities that could not be erased or forgotten. They then take revenge, taunting and seducing their author into giving them a story (both in Pirandello’s mind and as they convince the Manager to stage their drama in this First Act of the play). Entering a story Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate l

The whole trouble lies here. In words, words. Each one of us has within him a whole world of things, each man of us his own special world. And how can we ever come to an understanding if I put in the words I utter the sense and value of things as I see them; while you who listen to me must inevitably translate them according to the conception of things each one of you has within himself. We think we understand each other, but we never really do. Look here! This woman (indicating the Mother) takes all my pity for her as a specially ferocious form of cruelty.

Related Characters: The Father (speaker), The Mother, The Step-Daughter, The Manager
Page Number and Citation: 10
Explanation and Analysis:
When the Father and Step-Daughter begin recounting their versions of the family’s story, it becomes clear to the audience that they simply cannot agree on what happened. Most importantly, the other characters singlehandedly blame the Father for what he sees as a combination of bad luck and lapses in judgment—sending his wife away out of “pity” and sleeping with the Step-Daughter whose identity he claims not to have known. He argues that the others’ accusations against him are simply products of their misunderstanding, and that misunderstandings of this sort are simply an unavoidable part of human life. Accordingly, the Father Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque plac

Oh, all these intellectual complications make me sick, disgust me—all this philosophy that uncovers the beast in man, and then seeks to save him, excuse him… I can’t stand it, sir. When a man seeks to “simplify” life bestially, throwing aside every relic of humanity, every chaste aspiration, every pure feeling, all sense of ideality, duty, modesty, shame… then nothing is more revolting and nauseous than a certain kind of remorse—crocodiles’ tears, that’s what it is.

Related Characters: The Step-Daughter (speaker), The Manager, The Father
Related Literary Devices:
Page Number and Citation: 15
Explanation and Analysis:
After she, the other Characters, and the Manager are forced to endure yet another philosophical monologue from the Father, the Step-Daughter calls him out for analyzing his actions and singing his woes on a public stage only in order to hide his actual lack of remorse. His “philosophy […] uncovers the beast in man” not only because he makes arguments about the brutality of human nature, but also because his tendency to philosophize reveals his own egotism and lack of moral values. With her list of his faults, she specifically focuses on the latter—although the Father thinks he is searching Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore

For the drama lies all in this—in the conscience that I have, that each one of us has. We believe this conscience to be a single thing, but it is many-sided. There is one for this person, and another for that. Diverse consciences. So we have this illusion of being one person for all, of having a personality that is unique in all our acts. But it isn’t true. We perceive this when, tragically perhaps, in something we do, we are as it were, suspended, caught up in the air on a kind of hook. Then we perceive that all of us was not in that act, and that it would be an atrocious injustice to judge us by that action alone, as if all our existence were summed up in that one deed.

Related Characters: The Father (speaker), The Step-Daughter
Page Number and Citation: 16
Explanation and Analysis:
After arguing that people have different and incompatible perspectives on the world, the Father takes his philosophy to an even greater extreme: he now also believes that individuals themselves are multiple, with various competing “conscience[s]” and “personalit[ies]” that determine their actions and relations with others. On one level, this is a serious argument about the nature of human beings, who are more complex than they’re usually taken to be and whose identities are always difficult to precisely pin down. Indeed, for the Father, any claim about anyone’s identity is dishonest; even the Characters, who he claims “really” exist because they Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tene

The drama consists finally in this: when that mother re-enters my house, her family born outside of it, and shall we say superimposed on the original, ends with the death of the little girl, the tragedy of the boy and the flight of the elder daughter. It cannot go on, because it is foreign to its surroundings. So after much torment, we three remain: I, the mother, that son. Then, owing to the disappearance of that extraneous family, we too find ourselves strange to one another. We find we are living in an atmosphere of mortal desolation which is the revenge, as he (indicating Son) scornfully said of the Demon of Experiment, that unfortunately hides in me.

Related Characters: The Father (speaker), The Child, The Boy, The Manager, The Mother, The Son, The Step-Daughter
Related Literary Devices:
Page Number and Citation: 18
Explanation and Analysis:
Just before the end of the First Act, the Father offers this shocking prediction, which outlines exactly what will happen in the play’s last scene: the Child (“the little girl”) and the Boy die, and in most versions of the play the Step-Daughter (“the elder daughter”) runs maniacally out of the theater, leaving the original but eternally-scarred nuclear family standing alone onstage. This ending makes an important commentary about the rigid social expectation that families must be legitimate and nuclear, and the Characters’ ill-fated attempts to pursue and preserve this kind of family—which they ultimately achieve at the play’s climax, Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam. Aliquid iste enim. Sequi aut maxime. Adipisci voluptate et. Voluptas suscipit alias. In et eveniet. Eaque et repellendus. Dolores aut voluptatibus. Voluptatem qui voluptatum. Voluptatibus sed placeat. Aut tenetur autem. Fugit voluptates in. Quidem im

Act 2 Quotes

And they want to put it on the stage! If there was at least a reason for it! He thinks he has got at the meaning of it all. Just as if each one of us in every circumstance of life couldn’t find his own explanation of it! (Pauses.) He complains he was discovered in a place where he ought not to have been seen, in a moment of his life which ought to have remained hidden and kept out of the reach of that convention which he has to maintain for other people. And what about my case? Haven’t I had to reveal what no son ought ever to reveal: how father and mother live and are man and wife for themselves quite apart from that idea of father and mother which we give them?

Related Characters: The Son (speaker), The Father, The Mother
Page Number and Citation: 23
Explanation and Analysis:
Near the beginning of the Second Act, the Son and the Mother voice their frustrations onstage while the Father, Manager, and Step-Daughter collude about their play behind the scenes. The Son is disgusted that the Father, on top of all his other crimes, now wants to bring the family’s shameful history into the theater, making it a public spectacle. If the Father has destroyed the lives of his family members by continually breaking the fundamental rules of family—sending his wife to live with another man and sleeping with his Step-Daughter—then now he is doing it again by giving up the Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. M

Excuse me, all of you! Why are you so anxious to destroy in the name of a vulgar, commonplace sense of truth, this reality which comes to birth attracted and formed by the magic of the stage itself, which has indeed more right to live here than you, since it is much truer than you—if you don’t mind my saying so? Which is the actress among you who is to play Madame Pace? Well, here is Madame Pace herself. And you will allow, I fancy, that the actress who acts her will be less true than this woman here, who is herself in person. You see my daughter recognized her and went over to her at once. Now you’re going to witness the scene!

Related Characters: The Father (speaker), The Step-Daughter, Madame Pace
Page Number and Citation: 29
Explanation and Analysis:
When everyone is prepared to reenact the scene in which the Father meets the Step-Daughter in Madame Pace’s brothel, they realize there is a problem: Madame Pace is not there. Unfazed, the Father starts hanging up the women Actors’ clothes, convinced that Madame Pace will show up. And she does—as though by some magic, she walks into the theater and onstage, ready to perform her scene. The Manager and Actors are scandalized by this unlikely conjuration, but the Father insists that they are in the theater, after all—it makes no sense for actors, professional illusionists, to insist on “a vulgar, Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut

I never could stand rehearsing with the author present. He’s never satisfied!

Related Characters: The Manager (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 36
Explanation and Analysis:
The Manager’s joke again points to the contradictions of a play without an author: both the one the audience is watching, in which the people onstage argue about what has happened to their author, and the one the Manager and Characters are trying to put on, over which they constantly battle for authorial control. The author, for the Manager, is “never satisfied” because no reenactment of a piece can ever match an author’s mental image of a story—one that no author can ever directly translate onto the page, for (as the Father has already noted) language inevitably leads to miscommunication. Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis.

Acting is our business here. Truth up to a certain point, but no further.

Related Characters: The Manager (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 37
Explanation and Analysis:
When the Actors are rehearsing the scene between the Step-Daughter and the Father in Madame Pace’s brothel, the Manager tells the Leading Man to ask the Leading Lady about whose death she is mourning. The Step-Daughter interjects and explains that, in reality, the Father reacted to her being dressed for mourning by suggesting she “take off [her] little frock.” Scandalized, the Manager recoils and declares that this detail cannot possibly go to the stage—although it uniquely reveals the extent to which the Father mistreated and violated his family, it would simply “make a riot in the theater!” The Manager follows Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam. Aliquid iste enim. Sequi aut maxime. Adipisci voluptate et. Voluptas suscipit alias. In et eveniet. Eaque et repellendus. Dolores aut voluptatibus. Voluptatem qui voluptatum. Voluptatibus sed placeat. Aut tenetur autem. Fugit voluptates in. Quidem impedit sunt. Excepturi ullam nobis. Ducimus odio quo. Ut autem harum. Omnis vel voluptatum. Assumenda officia maiores. Voluptatem sint velit. Quod quia sapiente. Cum sunt qu

On the stage you can’t have a character becoming too prominent and overshadowing all the others. The thing is to pack them all into a neat little framework and then act what is actable. I am aware of the fact that everyone has his own interior life which he wants very much to put forward. But the difficulty lies in this fact: to set out just so much as is necessary for the stage, taking the other characters into consideration, and at the same time hint at the unrevealed interior life of each. I am willing to admit, my dear young lady, that from your point of view it would be a fine idea if each character couldtell the public all his troubles in a nice monologue or a regular one hour lecture (good humoredly). You must restrain yourself, my dear, and in our own interest, too; because this fury of yours, this exaggerated disgust you show, may make a bad impression, you know. After you have confessed to me that there were others before him at Madame Pace’s and more than once…

Related Characters: The Manager (speaker), The Step-Daughter, The Father, Madame Pace
Page Number and Citation: 37-8
Explanation and Analysis:
Throughout the play’s Second Act, the Father and Step-Daughter fall more and more out of line: they interrupt each other with lengthy monologues and repeatedly cut off the progress of the scene that they (and later the Actors) are supposed to be performing. The increasingly frustrated Manager finally explodes at the Step-Daughter, reminding him that he is in charge and that stories are not well served by Characters who analyze themselves, spoiling all the fun and secrets for the audience or reader. (Although this play leaves plenty such secrets open for discovery.) The Manager’s rant about creating “a neat little Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam. Aliquid iste enim. Sequi aut maxime. Adip

The darned idiot! I said “curtain” to show the act should end there, and he goes and lets it down in earnest (to the Father, while he pulls the curtain back to go on to the stage again). Yes, yes, it’s all right. Effect certain! That’s the right ending. I’ll guarantee the first act at any rate.

Related Characters: The Manager (speaker), The Machinist, The Father
Related Symbols: The Curtain
Related Literary Devices:
Page Number and Citation: 40
Explanation and Analysis:
The Second Act ends with an accident: the Manager, scheming out loud about his plans to monetize the Characters’ experiences as a stage drama, declares that the scene between the Father and the Step-Daughter has satisfactorily ended, and that the First Act of his future play should end there with the “curtain.” Hearing the Manager yell “curtain,” the Machinist wrongly assumes that the Manager wants the curtain lowered and does so—the Manager then utters this line as he steps past the curtain, which has just fallen for the first time since the audience initially walked into the theater. In fact, Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque

Act 3 Quotes

The illusion! For Heaven’s sake, don’t say illusion. Please don’t use that word, which is particularly painful for us.

Related Characters: The Father (speaker), The Leading Man, The Manager, The Leading Lady
Page Number and Citation: 42
Explanation and Analysis:
Early in the Third Act, the Step-Daughter, the Manager, and some of the Actors argue about how to stage the next portion of the Characters’ drama—will they tell it in multiple scenes with multiple sets, showing it to have occurred in different places at different times, as it actually did? Or will they combine it all into one scene, which might offer a more dramatic story that better expresses the family’s pain, despite distorting the authenticity of the narrative? The Step-Daughter argues for authenticity to the Characters’ history, but the Manager wants to stage everything in one scene. The Leading Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto vol

The FATHER. Can you tell me who you are?
The MANAGER (perplexed, half smiling). What? Who am I? I am myself.
The FATHER. And if I were to tell you that that isn’t true, because you are I…?

Related Characters: The Manager (speaker), The Father (speaker)
Page Number and Citation: 43
Explanation and Analysis:
In their umpteenth argument about reality, illusion, and the stage, the Father presents this challenge to the Manager. If the Characters are not “real” because they live only in a work of art, the Father suggests, then the Manager should at least be able to explain why he is more “real” than they are. But he does not have any way of grounding his identity, of explaining what he is or why he exists—his identity is merely his being himself, and unlike the Characters, this is not something he ever questions. Beyond questioning whether or not normal people actually have Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit n

If you think of all those illusions that mean nothing to you now, of all those things which don’t even seem to you to exist any more, while once they were for you, don’t you feel that—I won’t say these boards—but the very earth under your feet is sinking away from you when you reflect that in the same way this you as you feel it today—all this present reality of yours—is fated to seem a mere illusion to you tomorrow?

Related Characters: The Father (speaker), The Manager
Related Literary Devices:
Page Number and Citation: 43-4
Explanation and Analysis:
As they continue to debate whether the Characters or the Actors and Manager are “real” people, the Father returns to his previous claim: that people who live in art and fiction have real, essential identities, whereas normal, mortal humans are not anything at all. He makes this argument by citing the classic version of the philosophical problem of personal identity: because people constantly change, how can they remain the same people? In extreme cases, one might ask if someone who has entered a permanent coma or had various organ transplants remains, essentially, the same person—and, if so, what makes them Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima aut

I’m not philosophizing: I’m crying aloud the reason of my sufferings.

Related Characters: The Father (speaker), The Manager
Page Number and Citation: 45
Explanation and Analysis:
When the fed-up Manager tells the Father once and for all to shut up and stop “philosophizing,” this is the Father’s response. What for everyone else looks like a meaningless game of analysis is, for the Father, a meaningful attempt to stake a claim in the world and explain his existence. While the other Characters see the Father’s “philosophizing” as a series of excuses for his behavior (which he should instead acknowledge and repent for), he believes that he is gaining some understanding and creating some conciliatory meaning of the randomness and pointlessness of his experiences. For him, then, his Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus co

Authors, as a rule, hide the labour of their creations. When the characters are really alive before their author, the latter does nothing but follow them in their action, in their words, in the situations which they suggest to him; and he has to will them the way they will themselves—for there’s trouble if he doesn’t. When a character is born, he acquires at once such an independence, even of his own author, that he can be imagined by everybody even in many other situations where the author never dreamed of placing him; and so he acquires for himself a meaning which the author never thought of giving him.

Related Characters: The Father (speaker), The Manager
Page Number and Citation: 46
Explanation and Analysis:
Pirandello breaks the rules he has the Father explain here, precisely by having the Father explain them. He explicitly tells the audience that authors are supposed to keep silent, but by writing a whole play about the struggle over authorship and independence of Characters from their authors, he is drawing attention to rather than concealing “the labour of [his] creations.” Indeed, he does this throughout the play, for instance by staging the Characters’ quest for their author in a theater rehearsal, during the long process of preparation and polishing that actors and directors must work through before offering a completed Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidunt rerum est. Aperiam doloremque eum. Animi soluta perspiciatis. Ut minima autem. Modi omnis iure. Sint qui qui. Qui similique praesentium. Ex consequatur magnam

The SON (to Manager who stops him). I’ve got nothing to do with this affair. Let me go please! Let me go!
The MANAGER. What do you mean by saying you’ve got nothing to do with this?
The STEP-DAUGHTER (calmly, with irony). Don’t bother to stop him: he won’t go away.
The FATHER. He has to act the terrible scene in the garden with his mother.
The SON (suddenly resolute and with dignity). I shall act nothing at all. I’ve said so from the very beginning (to the Manager). Let me go!

Related Characters: The Manager (speaker), The Son (speaker), The Father (speaker), The Step-Daughter (speaker), The Mother
Page Number and Citation: 49
Explanation and Analysis:
Just before the play’s fateful final scene, the Manager and Father insist that the Son participate in their drama by acting a supposedly crucial scene with his increasingly-desperate Mother. The Son refuses, over and over—and while the play ultimately goes on, he does manage to keep this one scene out of the public’s view, preserving some semblance of privacy and autonomy, and ensuring that he remains “an ‘unrealized’ character, dramatically speaking.” The audience also never learns the full extent of his involvement in, or even partial responsibility for, the deaths of his two younger step-siblings. However, despite his profound objection Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur

SOME ACTORS. He’s dead! dead!
OTHER ACTORS. No, no, it’s only make believe, it’s only pretence!
The FATHER (with a terrible cry). Pretence? Reality, sir, reality!
The MANAGER. Pretence? Reality? To Hell with it all! Never in my life has such a thing happened to me. I’ve lost a whole day over these people, a whole day!
Curtain.

Related Characters: The Father (speaker), The Manager (speaker), The Child, The Boy
Related Symbols: The Curtain
Page Number and Citation: 52
Explanation and Analysis:
Six Characters in Search of an Author ends without resolution. Although predicted by both the Father and the Step-Daughter, the ending is left unexplained and the crucial questions unanswered: does the Boy kill the Child? How does the Boy get the revolver? Why does he shoot himself? Why (in most versions) does the Step-Daughter laugh demonically as she runs out of the theater? What really happened between the Son and the Mother? And, most importantly, do the Boy and the Child really die during the rehearsal, or are they merely acting out something that already happened in the past? (If Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad te
No matches.