This passage confirms that when May questioned whether or not Marcher could imagine a better fate than one without suffering, she
wasn’t hinting that his fate would be to have no fate, meaning she might have been saying that a good fate demands suffering. Additionally, readers might interpret May’s comment that her opinion about Marcher’s fate has changed to mean that she once thought Marcher
wouldn’t have a fate and now thinks that he
will (as Marcher assumes). But the novella doesn’t state this, and it’s possible that May has had two ideas about Marcher’s fate, both distinct from Marcher’s idea. After all, she’s always viewed his fate differently than him—remember that she once thought his fate would be love.