Previous
Book IV, Part I
Themes
and Colors
Key
LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in The Consolation of Philosophy, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
Classical Philosophy and Medieval Christianity
Wisdom, Fortune, and Happiness
The Problem of Evil
Human Free Will and God’s Foreknowledge
Summary
Analysis
Boethius expresses his surprise “at the magnitude of [Philosophy’s] promises,” and she begins her argument. She notes that, if good is shown to be strong, by implication evil is proven to be weak. So only one side of this equation needs to be proven. But Philosophy thinks she can prove both!
Readers are likely to share Boethius’s surprise: how can Philosophy possibly believe it—never mind prove it—to be just that tyrants have seized power in Rome and begun deposing, arresting, and executing dedicated civil servants like Boethius?
Active
Themes
Philosophy states that human action requires two things: free will, which spurs people to take actions, and power, which gives them the capacity to follow through with actions. Importantly, one’s power can be measured by what one is capable of doing. She reminds Boethius that everyone desires (or instinctively wills) happiness, which is the same as “the good itself.” Good people successfully attain this goodness, and “the wicked” clearly fail to attain it. Since good people are capable of attaining the goodness they want, but wicked people are not, and power is defined by people’s capacity to attain what they want, then clearly the good are more powerful than the wicked.
Fortunately, this argument is rather more straightforward than Philosophy’s arguments about God at the end of Book III. Her analysis of human action as the combination of will and power allows her to equate evil with weakness: both the evil and the good have the same will, so if the good achieve their goal and the evil do not, then only their power must differ. Therefore, she encourages Boethius and the reader to see evil people as impotent fools: they want to be happy but are ignorant, weak, and confused, so they cannot fulfill their dreams. But readers might ask if this argument does justice to the devastation that evil causes: is it enough to tell the victim of a crime or other act of evil that the person who injured them was simply too ignorant to understand what they were really doing? And don’t evildoers, by definition, necessarily need physical power to carry out the evil they do?
Active
Themes
Philosophy compares the difference between good and evil people to the difference between someone who walks “natural[ly]” on their feet and someone who cannot, and instead “tries to walk on [their] hands.” The person who walks on their feet is more powerful than the one who walks on their hands. Similarly, good people who pursue happiness through “a natural activity—the exercise of their virtues” are more powerful than evil people who seek happiness “by means of their various desires, which isn’t a natural method of obtaining the good.” In fact, the wicked are so weak that they fail even though “their natural inclination leads them” toward the good. But how is this possible?
Active
Themes
Philosophy considers various reasons for why people might go against nature and choose vice over virtue. Some suffer the profound weakness of ignorance and “do not know what is good.” Others know what is good but give into their instincts for “pleasure” because of a “lack of self-control.” And others, who “knowingly and willingly” choose evil over goodness, in fact “cease to exist.” Being wicked is like being dead: both lack “absolute and complete existence.” One cannot “simply call [a corpse] a [hu]man,” and neither can one call a wicked person fully human. These people have strayed so far from their natural inclinations that they can’t even be said to exist anymore.
Get the entire The Consolation of Philosophy LitChart as a printable PDF.
"My students can't get enough of your charts and their results have gone through the roof." -Graham S.
While some think that evil people can be powerful, Philosophy replies that their power “comes from weakness rather than strength,” and that if they were really strong, they would be able to do good. In fact, “evil is nothing,” so the wicked have only the power to “do nothing.”
Active
Themes
So how can evil exist if God is supremely good, and nothing is more powerful than God? Indeed, God is good because He is supremely powerful and therefore “can only do good.” Humans, in contrast, are not supremely powerful, and so “can also do evil.” In closing, Philosophy summarizes that goodness is power, and evil is weakness. As Plato argued, the good achieve goodness and while the wicked pursue pleasure, but this gets in the way of them truly reaching “the good they desire.”
Active
Themes
Philosophy sings of “savage” kings whose uncontrolled passions overtake them, distance them from happiness, and “enslave” them.
Active
Themes
