The Disappearing Spoon

The Disappearing Spoon

by

Sam Kean

Teachers and parents! Our Teacher Edition on The Disappearing Spoon makes teaching easy.

The Disappearing Spoon: Chapter 7: Extending the Table, Expanding the Cold War Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
In 1950, The New Yorker reported that two new elements had been discovered at UC Berkeley, named berkelium and californium. The article teased the scientists in question for this naming choice. However, naming new elements was no joke—it was a serious dimension of the Cold War. Glenn Seaborg was a Nobel Prize-winning Berkeley professor who had been a team leader on the Manhattan Project and advised a long list of presidents. However, his first major breakthrough was simply thanks to “dumb luck.” In 1940, a colleague of Seaborg named Edwin McMillan created “the first transuranic element,” which he called neptunium. Following this, he sought to investigate if element 93 could decay into 94.
Even something as seemingly benign and uncontroversial as giving an element a name took on dramatic political significance under the charged atmosphere for the cold war. On one hand, this stimulated investment in and public appreciation for science, which was arguably a good thing. At the same time, it severed opportunities for global collaboration and turned innocent acts of scientific discovery into acts of (cold) war.
Themes
Storytelling and Science Theme Icon
Experimentation, Accidents, and Discovery Theme Icon
Nature vs. Culture Theme Icon
Science for Good vs. for Evil Theme Icon
The Expansion and Limits of Human Knowledge Theme Icon
McMillan’s research was interrupted when he was conscripted by the U.S. military to work on radars for the war effort. Seaborg was left behind and he succeeded in getting element 93 to decay into 94, which was named plutonium. This discovery propelled Seaborg to fame and shortly after he was called to work on the Manhattan Project. He brought a technician with him named Al Ghiorso; after the project was over they returned to Berkeley and together discovered more elements than any other scientist. Although the general population did not display much interest in their discoveries, the pair kept at it. Their crowning achievement was the creation of element 101.
There are several examples in the book of scientists being passed over for opportunities and acclaim, only to use these slights to their advantage. This is what happened to Seaborg, whose relative obscurity meant that he wasn’t drafted into military service and used the time he had to instead discover a new element, plutonium.
Themes
Experimentation, Accidents, and Discovery Theme Icon
Nature vs. Culture Theme Icon
Science for Good vs. for Evil Theme Icon
The Expansion and Limits of Human Knowledge Theme Icon
The process of creating element 101 was extremely tricky. It involved conducting half of the experiment in one lab and the other in another lab that was miles away. Ghiorso had to quickly drive the sample between labs himself. The experiment finally succeeded after many tries in February 1955. The new element was named mendelevium, after Dmitri Mendeleev, which was politically bold in light of the ongoing cold war. Meanwhile, only two elements were discovered in Russia: ruthenium and samarium. In the early decades of the Soviet Union, the government poured a large amount of money into science, hoping to reverse the impression of Russia as a “backward” nation. This attracted the attention and envy of people around the world.
The question of whether capitalism or communism better supports science will, of course, be answered differently depending on who one asks. On one hand, having state support for science can be useful: if the state provides free, high-quality science education to young people as well as funding for universities and other institutions, the result will be progress. Under capitalism, private entities might fill whatever funding gaps the state does not provide. Capitalists would argue that this is a more efficient system.
Themes
Storytelling and Science Theme Icon
Experimentation, Accidents, and Discovery Theme Icon
Nature vs. Culture Theme Icon
Science for Good vs. for Evil Theme Icon
The Expansion and Limits of Human Knowledge Theme Icon
However, once Joseph Stalin came to power, the flourishing of Russian science faltered. Stalin ruthlessly ruled against what he called “bourgeois” forms of science, and scientific knowledge in the country took a retrograde, irrational turn. Many scientists were arrested and sent to forced labor camps, where they worked on nickel mines. Stalin considered physics “bourgeois” and thus considered forcefully shutting down the whole field—however, he then realized this would jeopardize the Soviet nuclear weapons program. One of the physicists in this program was named Georgy Flyorov, a man who paid close attention to German and American research on uranium fission in the 1940s and tipped Stalin off that these countries were perhaps trying to build a nuclear bomb. The government rewarded Flyorov with the gift of his own research lab.
This passage shows the downsides of having a state-supported funding system for science (and, more importantly, of having a brutally authoritarian government). Many capitalists would argue that trusting the state to fund science education and research risks creating a situation in which the state controls what knowledge is produced (as Stalin did). At the same time, the exact same accusation could be made of the capitalist system. If wealthy companies and individuals fund science, they may well influence the production of knowledge to suit themselves (as has happened in reality).
Themes
Storytelling and Science Theme Icon
Experimentation, Accidents, and Discovery Theme Icon
Nature vs. Culture Theme Icon
Science for Good vs. for Evil Theme Icon
The Expansion and Limits of Human Knowledge Theme Icon
Get the entire The Disappearing Spoon LitChart as a printable PDF.
The Disappearing Spoon PDF
During the race to create new elements and fill out the periodic table, the Berkeley scientists largely “won.” However, Russia did have a triumph in the form of element 104. Seaborg and Ghiorso rushed to make 104 themselves, but by that point, the Russians had already made 105. The opposing teams produced 106 in 1974 at almost the exact same time. The teams would not agree on the names of these new elements, each developing their own respective names for them. The competition lasted into the 1990s, when a West German team also joined in. An international ruling body stepped in to adjudicate, ultimately awarding the naming rights to the Berkeley scientists. However, by the 1990s, the Berkeley team fell far behind the Germans and Russians.  
This passage underlines how international competition can be both good and bad for science. Competition drives science forward, inspiring scientists and making it more likely that their work will be funded (by a government or other body invested in the outcome of the competition). At the same time, it imbues science with unpleasant qualities of egotism, jealousy, and pettiness—and prohibits collaboration. 
Themes
Storytelling and Science Theme Icon
Experimentation, Accidents, and Discovery Theme Icon
Nature vs. Culture Theme Icon
Science for Good vs. for Evil Theme Icon
The Expansion and Limits of Human Knowledge Theme Icon
Berkeley’s “comeback” came in the form of a daring experiment that resulted in the production of not one but two new elements: 116 and 118. Yet when the Russians and Germans tried to repeat the experiment, they did not get the same results: a member of the Berkley team, Victor Ninov, had faked the data, inputting false positives. Ninov was fired and Berkeley was forced to take back their claim to have found 118. To make matters worse for Berkeley, the Russians have now found 118, and while at the time of writing official approval is still pending, Kean has no doubt that it will pass.
The Disappearing Spoon features a surprising number of scientists who tinker with (or even entirely fake) their results. The reasons for this are many: some seek money or fame, while others appear to delude themselves that they are doing nothing wrong in the process of deceiving others. The intensely competitive and pressurized life of a high-level scientist can be intense, leading to regrettable behaviors.
Themes
Storytelling and Science Theme Icon
Experimentation, Accidents, and Discovery Theme Icon
Nature vs. Culture Theme Icon
Science for Good vs. for Evil Theme Icon
The Expansion and Limits of Human Knowledge Theme Icon