The Idiot

The Idiot

by

Fyodor Dostoevsky

Teachers and parents! Our Teacher Edition on The Idiot makes teaching easy.

The Idiot: Part Three, Chapter Four Summary & Analysis

Summary
Analysis
Myshkin and Rogozhin approach Lebedev’s dacha and see a lively crowd gathered on the terrace, drinking champagne. Myshkin is confused why they are all there. When he enters the crowd, everyone lines up to wish him happy birthday. A very drunk Lebedev explains that a number of different people had, by chance, been waiting for Myshkin on the terrace when Keller showed up and said the next day was the prince’s birthday. Kolya then insisted that there should be a party with champagne. Lebedev emphasizes that it is his own champagne being served, not the bottles the prince bought. Even Ferdyshchenko is there, as is Evgeny, who tells Myshkin that he’s managed to dissuade the officer from challenging him to a duel.
Myshkin’s haphazard, spontaneous surprise birthday party illustrates how popular he has become within the social world of the novel. People were queuing up to see him on the terrace of Lebedev’s dacha without even realizing that it was his birthday. Of course, this lack of awareness also points to the way in which many of the characters use Myshkin to their own ends, seeking his advice, alliance, or support rather than having a proper reciprocal friendship with him.
Themes
Innocence v. Foolishness Theme Icon
Money, Greed, and Corruption Theme Icon
Passion, Violence, and Christianity Theme Icon
Evgeny says that he’s going to St. Petersburg the next day to sort out his uncle’s business. He says he wants to be Myshkin’s friend, and that he also wants to have a private conversation with him, but this isn’t the right place for it. Myshkin then speaks to Ippolit, who says that he’s glad that today is Myshkin’s birthday. Seeing Ippolit’s liveliness, Myshkin suggests that he should rest, but Ippolit dismisses him, calling Myshkin his “nanny.” At some point, the group have decided to have a debate, with General Ivolgin acting as “chairman”—a role he enthusiastically embraces. Keller comments that he likes the way members of parliament in England speak, addressing each other as “the noble earl” and “my noble opponent.”
It is significant that the most common party activity among the characters in the novel is having debates, usually over political or philosophical issues. This reflects the central role that contemporary issues and ideologies play in the lives of the characters. It is also a way for Dostoevsky to constantly explore philosophical matters and experiment with presenting different viewpoints through the framework of the novel’s plot.
Themes
Innocence v. Foolishness Theme Icon
Social Hierarchy, Authority, and Rebellion Theme Icon
Absurdity and Nihilism Theme Icon
The group debate philosophical matters, although the conversation at times veers into nonsense. Among the questions debated is whether industrialization is ruining the spiritual aspect of human existence. They then move onto a discussion of cannibalism instigated by Lebedev, who claims that in the twelfth century, famines forced poor people to eat “sixty monks and several lay babies.” The others dismiss this as ridiculous, but at this point Myshkin speaks for the first time, suggesting that Lebedev might be right. He talks about the steep taxes that people have to pay to the clergy, and asks how poor people are supposed to be able to feed themselves. Ganya suggests that the starving masses chose to eat monks because in the 12th century, monks were the only people who were fat. 
This passage shows how a silly and comic turn in conversation can also contain very serious, important consideration of the novel’s themes. While the cannibalistic consumption of monks might seem amusingly outlandish, in reality the disproportionate wealth of the church and its role in keeping peasants in a state of poverty had been a major issue in Russia for many centuries. Indeed, it is only in the era in which The Idiot is set that substantial actions are finally being taken to curb the greed of the clergy.
Themes
Innocence v. Foolishness Theme Icon
Money, Greed, and Corruption Theme Icon
Social Hierarchy, Authority, and Rebellion Theme Icon
Absurdity and Nihilism Theme Icon
Passion, Violence, and Christianity Theme Icon
Lebedev agrees, saying that at this time the clergy were 60 times fatter than everyone else. He continues as if he was in court defending a client who ate several babies. He talks about the present, describing it as “the age of crime and railways” instead of “the age of steam and railways” and blaming it on his drunken state. He considers the question of progress, and argues that although there is more wealth in the contemporary moment than there was in the past, there is also “less force,” less of an idea holding everything together. He claims: “We’re all, all, all overstewed!”
Lebedev’s slip between “the age of steam and railways” and “the age of crime and railways” is very revealing. It indicates that, contrary to the idea that modernization brings greater peace and prosperity, it in fact might cause an increase in corruption, chaos, and crime. 
Themes
Money, Greed, and Corruption Theme Icon
Social Hierarchy, Authority, and Rebellion Theme Icon
Absurdity and Nihilism Theme Icon
Passion, Violence, and Christianity Theme Icon
Get the entire The Idiot LitChart as a printable PDF.
The Idiot PDF
Everyone laughs, but Keller remains serious and accuses Lebedev of “attack[ing] enlightenment” in favor of medieval backwardness. Toward the end of this conversation, Ganya suddenly seems troubled by something, and gets up to sit by Rogozhin. Myshkin, meanwhile, is in a jolly mood. Evgeny expresses annoyance about Ippolit’s presence.
Lebedev’s speech could be interpreted as implying that it would be better to go back to the preindustrial age. As a young nihilist who is very much the product of his modern era, Keller is appalled by this idea.
Themes
Innocence v. Foolishness Theme Icon
Social Hierarchy, Authority, and Rebellion Theme Icon
Absurdity and Nihilism Theme Icon