Refusal Summary & Analysis

Question about this poem?
Have a question about this poem?
Have a specific question about this poem?
Have a specific question about this poem?
Have a specific question about this poem?
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
A LitCharts expert can help.
Ask us
Ask us
Ask a question
Ask a question
Ask a question

The Full Text of “Refusal”

The Full Text of “Refusal”

  • “Refusal” Introduction

    • In Maya Angelou's "Refusal," a speaker decides that if they and their lover can't be together forever—even beyond the end of their life on Earth—they will simply refuse to die at all. The speaker's intense passion for a lover they "adore," body and soul, gives them an irreverent courage. To a person who's deeply in love, this poem suggests, the usual rules of life and death seem trivial. Angelou published this poem in her 1978 collection And Still I Rise.

  • “Refusal” Summary

    • The speaker addresses their lover, asking them: in what other life and what other place did I first get to know your lips, your hands, and your courageous, cheeky laugh? I love all of these larger-than-life qualities in you. How can I be certain that we'll meet again, in another world, at some unknown time in the future? I rebel against my body's mortality. Unless the universe makes me a promise that we'll meet again, I simply won't agree to die.

  • “Refusal” Themes

    • Theme Death-Defying Love

      Death-Defying Love

      “Refusal” tells a story of love’s power over death. The poem’s speaker is so deeply in love that they feel sure they must have known their beloved before, in “other lives or lands.” The pair of them, the speaker is sure, must go way, way back; perhaps they knew each other in past lives. Their delight in their beloved’s “lips,” “hands,” and “laughter” feels so profound that it’s too much for one lifetime.

      However, though the speaker is confident that they’ve known their beloved for more than a lifetime, they can’t be totally sure that they will “meet again” in some “future time undated” and some “other world[].” There’s no guarantee, in other words, that they’ll go on being lovers eternally.

      The speaker thus decides to take matters into their own hands. Until they’re offered the “Promise / Of one more sweet encounter” with their beloved, they say, they “will not deign to die.” They will simply refuse to leave this world and this body until they’re sure they will meet their beloved again in whatever life comes next. (It’s not clear precisely whom they want to get this grand, capitalized “Promise” from—the universe, God?—but they’re certainly standing up to a massive force here!)

      This bold declaration is a statement of serious faith in the power of love. It’s because the speaker feels so very deeply about their beloved that they feel able to confront to the most powerful forces in the universe: they simply won’t put up with any nonsense from death. Their belief that they knew their beloved in past lives likewise suggests that, to them, love is a force that transcends the boundaries of any one lifetime.

      While the speaker sounds pretty bold and confident here, the poem might also be read a little more wistfully or ruefully. No human being has so far successfully evaded death forever, or gotten a matter-of-fact “Promise” from the universe about anything that will happen beyond death. The speaker’s cheeky defiance could thus also be interpreted as passionate but wishful thinking, a picture of how love makes a person feel they can defy death—or wish desperately that they could.

      Where this theme appears in the poem:
      • Lines 1-16
  • Line-by-Line Explanation & Analysis of “Refusal”

    • Lines 1-6

      Beloved, ...
      ... Irreverent.

      The first line of “Refusal” is just one emphatic word: “Beloved.” This poem, then, is the speaker’s address to someone they adore. They love this person so much, in fact, that they feel certain they’ve known them in another life. “In what other lives or lands,” they ask their beloved, might they have met before? Because there’s something deeply familiar about:

      [….] your lips
      Your hands
      Your laughter brave
      Irreverent.

      This lover doesn’t seem sparkly and new to the speaker, these lines suggest, but deeply “known.” The speaker feels as if they’ve known this lover across time and space. In this short poem, the speaker will proclaim that love has the power to cross even what seem like the most impenetrable boundaries.

      Readers can hear the speaker's passion in the shape of their language. Their anaphora on the word “your” stresses the idea that it’s this one person’s delicious “lips,” “hands,” and “laughter” that speak to them, not anyone else’s. And the drawn-out /l/ alliteration of “life,” “lands,” “lips,” and “laughter” makes it sound as if the speaker is positively luxuriating in every word they say about this beloved soul.

      While this poem is written in free verse, without a regular rhyme scheme or meter, these first lines do use one little flicker of rhyme. The harmonious rhyme between “lands” and “hands” in lines 2 and 4 makes the poem's introduction feel musical, emphasizing the speaker’s pleasure in describing their beloved.

      The speaker relishes the thought of their beloved’s physical beauty (and their sexuality: “lips” and “hands” feel like particularly intimate body parts to single out, suggesting that the speaker has their beloved’s kisses and embraces in mind). They’re also moved by their beloved’s humor and courage.

      The beloved’s laughter gets described in more detail than anything else about them. Their laugh, the speaker says, is both “brave” and “irreverent.” The word “irreverent” even gets a line to itself, suggesting that irreverence—a willingness to laugh at even the most solemn things—is one of the things about the beloved that delights the speaker the most. That irreverence, as readers will see, is a quality the beloved and the speaker share.

    • Lines 7-8

      Those sweet excesses ...
      ... I do adore.

    • Lines 9-12

      What surety is ...
      ... Future time undated.

    • Lines 13-16

      I defy my ...
      ... deign to die.

  • “Refusal” Poetic Devices & Figurative Language

    • End-Stopped Line

      The poem’s steady end-stopped lines help to create the speaker’s calm, confident tone. Lines 3-6, for instance, roll along slowly, one clause at a time, as if the speaker is relishing every word they say about their lover:

      […] your lips
      Your hands
      Your laughter brave
      Irreverent.

      While each of these lines is a small part of a longer sentence, the lines break where a sentence naturally might, at places where one might normally introduce a comma. This means that each of the lover’s features gets its own line and its own space, as if the speaker is lingering over the thought of “lips,” “hands,” and “laughter” for a few delicious seconds apiece. The lone word “irreverent” also gets a little space of its own this way, a choice that highlights a quality the lover and the speaker share. The speaker, like their lover, will be irreverent in this poem, laughing in the face of death.

      End-stopped lines also help to mark out the poem’s shape. The poem is divided into five sentences, each concluded with an end-stopped line; there aren’t any mid-line caesurae here. Instead, ideas come to a close where lines do. Take lines 7-8, for example:

      Those sweet excesses that
      I do adore.

      That firm period after “adore” helps to make the speaker’s voice sound steady and sure. There’s no doubt about their adoration.

      Perhaps the most dramatic end-stopped line in the poem appears in line 13:

      I defy my body’s haste.

      This is the only complete one-line sentence in the poem, and it marks a powerful moment of decision. The speaker here declares that they simply won’t play by the body’s rules and hurry on toward death. Their firm sentence structure here makes it clear that they’re not fooling around: the sheer force of their love will allow them to rebel even against their own mortality.

      Where end-stopped line appears in the poem:
      • Line 1: “Beloved,”
      • Line 3: “your lips”
      • Line 4: “Your hands”
      • Line 5: “laughter brave”
      • Line 6: “Irreverent.”
      • Line 8: “adore.”
      • Line 10: “again,”
      • Line 12: “undated.”
      • Line 13: “haste.”
      • Line 16: “die.”
    • Enjambment

    • Repetition

    • Alliteration

  • "Refusal" Vocabulary

    Select any word below to get its definition in the context of the poem. The words are listed in the order in which they appear in the poem.

    • Irreverent
    • Excesses
    • Surety
    • Defy
    • Haste
    • Deign
    • (Location in poem: Lines 5-6: “Your laughter brave / Irreverent.”)

      Disrespectful of serious things—often in a pleasantly cheeky or witty way.

  • Form, Meter, & Rhyme Scheme of “Refusal”

    • Form

      “Refusal” is written in free verse. That means it doesn’t use a regular meter or rhyme scheme. Instead, Angelou leaves herself free to shape the lines organically.

      In this particular poem, Angelou keeps her lines short and sweet. Some lines are only one word long, and none is longer than six words. These short, firm lines give the speaker’s voice a confident tone, whether they’re savoring a memory of their lover or refusing to be parted from them.

      The poem is built from five leisurely sentences of varying lengths. The first, in which the speaker celebrates their lover, runs over six celebratory lines, while later passages are shorter and more emphatic. Only at one place in the poem is a sentence delivered in just one firm end-stopped line: line 13, where the speaker audaciously declares, “I defy my body’s haste.” This rhythmic difference marks a tonal turning point. The speaker here moves from dreaming about their lover and fretting that death might separate them to point-blank refusing to die until they know they’ll see their beloved on the other side.

    • Meter

      Since this poem uses free verse, it doesn’t have a regular meter. But it does have a distinct pace. Its short lines often make the speaker sound calm, unhurried, and dreamy as they think about their lover—or bold and firm, like when they declare their intention to stay alive until someone offers them a “Promise” that they can be with their beloved after death. Because the lines stay pretty even throughout, mostly ranging between three and six words long, the speaker’s delight in their lover and determination to be with their lover forever feel equally confident and sure.

      In a couple of places, the speaker introduces a one-word line: “Beloved” in line 1 and “Irreverent” in line 6. Both of those words, standing alone, get a little extra weight:

      • The reasons the speaker might want to single out their “beloved” on a line of their own feel clear enough: the beloved is at the heart of this poem.
      • By framing the word “irreverent” in a line of its own, meanwhile, Angelou hints that irreverence might be a particularly important idea here. The speaker uses the word as they delight in their beloved’s cheeky laugh. Perhaps they especially enjoy their lover’s irreverence because they themselves are not exactly reverent. After all, they feel quite confident demanding a “Promise” from whoever runs the universe that they’ll meet their lover again after death—and refusing to die until their conditions are met!
    • Rhyme Scheme

      This poem doesn’t have a regular rhyme scheme. However, Angelou does use a single touch of rhyme in lines 1-4:

      Beloved,
      In what other lives or lands
      Have I known your lips
      Your hands

      This lone rhyme gives the poem a hint of music at a moment when the speaker is clearly relishing their thoughts of their lover. The rhyme highlights the simple word “hands,” inviting readers to consider all the things the beloved’s hands might mean to the speaker: how beautiful the beloved’s hands are in themselves, perhaps, but also what the beloved might do with those hands.

  • “Refusal” Speaker

    • The poem’s speaker is someone who’s at once romantic and “irreverent,” to use their own word. They’re passionately in love with someone whose every gesture and laugh they adore. They're so deeply in love, in fact, that they believe they must have known this person in past lives. They’re also insistent that they’re going to keep on knowing this beloved in whatever comes after this life.

      It's here that their irreverence enters the picture. Rather than simply hoping that they’ll be bound to their lover forever, they decide to take matters into their own hands. If they can’t get a “Promise” that they can meet their lover again, whether in the afterlife or their next life, they’ll simply refuse to die. One way or the other, then, their love will be eternal.

      This demand for a big, capital-P Promise—and the cocky refusal to die if that demand isn’t met—challenges some pretty awe-inspiring forces. The speaker here stands up not just to death, but to the universe, or God, or whatever else might be in charge of death, reincarnation, and/or the afterlife. Like their lover, then, they’re “irreverent,” unafraid to confront even the most mysterious and sacred powers. Clearly, the only things they feel true reverence for are love and their lover.

  • “Refusal” Setting

    • There’s no clear setting in this poem; this love story could take place in any era and any place. That makes a lot of sense, considering the speaker's sense that love might be able to transcend time and space. The speaker tells their beloved that they’re sure they first met them in “other lives or lands”—in other times, places, existences than the one they’re in now. They’re certain that the love they feel for this person is soul-deep, something that can travel with them across the borders of time and death.

      Or, at least, they really want to believe that, so much so that they demand a grand “Promise” from the universe, an assurance that they’ll never be separated from their lover. Even if they end up in "other worlds” entirely, they’ll want to explore those worlds with this same beloved soul.

      The lack of a specific setting here not only suggests that the speaker and their beloved share an immortal love, but that this particular speaker’s experience might be a timeless one. Lots of lovestruck people across the centuries might similarly have felt that their love isn’t limited by time, space, or death.

  • Literary and Historical Context of “Refusal”

    • Literary Context

      Maya Angelou (1928–2014) was one of the most beloved American writers of the 20th century. She first became famous for her memoir I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, in which she describes her troubled childhood with an honesty and openness that many of her early critics found shocking—and many of her early readers found moving and inspiring. Over the course of her long career, she would write a whole series of memoirs, as well as many books of poetry. "Refusal" first appeared in her acclaimed 1978 collection And Still I Rise.

      Angelou was a member of the Black Arts Movement, a cultural movement that sprang up in Harlem in the 1960s and '70s. In response to oppression, violence, and racism, Black writers and artists including Angelou, Amiri Baraka, Gwendolyn Brooks, Sonia Sanchez, Nikki Giovanni, Audre Lorde, June Jordan, and Etheridge Knight sought to foster a Black artistic community free from the dominance of white society. Their work centered Black experiences and articulated visions of justice and social change. This poem's description of passionate love shows the joyous, celebratory face of the movement.

      As a Black American poet and memoirist, Angelou also saw herself as a member of a literary tradition that included writers like Langston Hughes and Paul Laurence Dunbar. She was also good friends with the essayist and novelist James Baldwin; the two were both major voices in the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s and '70s. In turn, Angelou has influenced countless people, from the cartoonist Keith Knight to the former U.S. President Barack Obama.

      Historical Context

      “Refusal” is one of a series of love poems that Angelou wrote around the time she got together with Paul du Feu, a man she would be married to for about a decade. Their marriage drew a lot of public attention, in part because du Feu had already been in the spotlight for a connection to a powerful woman: he was previously (briefly) married to the major feminist writer Germaine Greer. What’s more, du Feu was White and Angelou was Black. The couple got married in 1974, only seven short years after the Supreme Court ruled (in the landmark case Loving v. Virginia) that state laws against interracial marriage were unconstitutional.

      The defiant celebration of love in this poem thus carries political as well as personal weight. Angelou often made a bold, joyful stand for the value and beauty of Black female pleasure and sexual freedom. (In one of her most famous poems, the rallying cry “Still I Rise,” she likewise lays defiant claim to her sexuality as a right, a delight, and a source of pride.) This poem doesn’t need to be explicitly political to make a defiant statement.

  • More “Refusal” Resources