Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque erro
Here, Kim reveals his egoism, exemplified by the objectifying terms he views the lama in, seeing him as something to “take possession” of. The value Kim places on the lama, in other words, has nothing to do with the lama’s inherent value as a human, but rather what he can give to Kim. In this context, Kim’s generosity towards the lama reads as largely self-serving, raising the age-old question of whether good acts done for selfish reasons have ethical merit.