Noli Me Tangere
Noli Me Tangere
by José Rizal
✓

or to save your progress

Themes and Colors
Colonialism, Religion, and Power Theme Icon
Revolution and Reform Theme Icon
Education Theme Icon
Isolation Theme Icon
LitCharts assigns a color and icon to each theme in Noli Me Tangere, which you can use to track the themes throughout the work.
Revolution and Reform Theme Icon
Revolution and Reform Theme Icon

Because Spanish friars and the Spanish colonial government had such control over the Philippines, Rizal naturally focuses much of his attention on the possibility of political change. He outlines two schools of thought for making political change: the moderate liberalism embodied by Ibarra, and the radical revolutionary ideology espoused by Elías. The first approach advocates for reform that would take place within the context of the oppressive religious and governmental forces that already exist in the Philippines. According to this point of view, there is still something worth salvaging in the prevailing system. The second approach—championed by Elías—argues for a complete overthrow of the existing power structures, which are irrevocably flawed and incapable of organic change. These opposing viewpoints run throughout the novel, posing an important question about political and cultural transformation: is it better to change a corrupt system from within, or is it better to completely overthrow it using whatever means necessary?

The Civil Guard, Spain’s militarized colonial law enforcement, has a strong presence in Noli Me Tangere, as it represents the Spanish government’s civic power. Although the ensign—the leader of San Diego’s Civil Guard—is often at odds with Father Salví (the embodiment of the church), the church and the state often work together to dominate Filipino natives who resist Spain’s civic and religious authority. The fact that Ibarra’s father is labeled a “subversive and heretic” is a perfect example of how the church and state work together to oppress townspeople, since they punish the man simultaneously and equally for being “subversive” to the government and for challenging Catholic doctrine. In this way, the church and Civil Guard mutually reinforce each other’s power, which makes them a formidable political force.

Throughout the novel, Ibarra and Elías debate the morality and logic of total revolution. Elías, for his part, believes that the current government is simultaneously too removed from and too harsh on the population. When Ibarra argues that the Civil Guard acts brutally toward its citizens in order to improve their behavior, Elías points out that the government doesn’t give its citizens the necessary tools to live the way it wants them to. In other words, the government—in conjunction with the church—has so disempowered the native population that it can’t possibly expect them to rise to the high standards it sets, and so punishing them is unjust. This is an important argument because it refutes Ibarra’s belief that there is a morally justifiable reason for the government to treat its citizens badly, and it justifies Elías’ commitment to overthrowing the system entirely.

Elías continues this argument by considering the notions of agency and empowerment. He believes that the “individual, neglected and abandoned by the state” has less “responsibility” under oppressive circumstances, since he will inevitably make bad decisions and live a less “enlighten[ed]” life. In other words, disempowerment creates unmotivated citizens, and in an oppressive system, there is no incentive to live a good and moral life. Because of this, the government must be more “lenient.” Unfortunately, the Civil Guard eagerly labels anybody who strays from what they view as the path of “enlightenment” as “subversive,” teaming up with the church to level claims of heresy against these individuals who have not been given the necessary tools to succeed on the “enlightened” path in the first place.

At first, Ibarra rejects Elías’ logic, since he optimistically believes that one must retain a small amount of faith in the systems that control the Philippines. He believes that the government recognizes the church’s corruption and is “working to introduce reforms that will correct these things.” He has even told Elías that he believes the church, for all its faults, is a positive presence: “This institution might be imperfect, yet I believe that, but for the fear it inspires, the number of criminals would increase.” Simply put, Ibarra believes that even the threats posed by such institutions are potentially valuable because they discourage criminality. However, Ibarra finally changes his mind after Father Salví organizes a revolt against the Civil Guard and frames Ibarra as their leader, leaving Ibarra at the mercy of the corrupt power of the Civil Guard and the friars. Ironically, his reaction to being labeled a subversive is to actually become a subversive: “They opened my eyes,” he tells Elías, “they made me see the sores and forced me to become a criminal! And so, just what they wanted, I will be a subversive, but a true subversive.” This reaction confirms Elías’s theory that the oppressive system ultimately drives good people into lives of crime because they have been given no other prospects or choices. With Ibarra’s transformation into a radical, Rizal champions retaliation and revolution, a risky political move for an author writing in a colonial state that is incubating rebellion.

Related Themes from Other Texts
Compare and contrast themes from other texts to this theme…
Get the entire Noli Me Tangere LitChart as a printable PDF.
"My students can't get enough of your charts and their results have gone through the roof." -Graham S.
Noli Me Tangere PDF

Revolution and Reform Quotes in Noli Me Tangere

Below you will find the important quotes in Noli Me Tangere related to the theme of Revolution and Reform.

Chapter 25 Quotes

“Because sane people,” he went on with a bitter irony, “will think you are crazy, too. People believe that madness is when you don’t think as they do, which is why they take me for a madman. And I’m grateful for that, because, well, the day on which they restore my reason is the day they deprive me of the small bit of freedom I’ve purchased at the price of a reputation as a sane person. And who knows if they are right? I neither think nor live according to their laws. My principles, my ideals, are different. Among them the mayor enjoys a reputation as a sane individual, since he has not learned anything more than how to serve chocolate and suffer Father Dámaso’s ill humor.”

Related Characters: Old Tasio (Don Anastasio) (speaker), Juan Crisóstomo Ibarra y Magsalin (Ibarra), The Mayor, Father Dámaso
Page Number and Citation: 162
Explanation and Analysis:
Tasio says this to Ibarra as a way of convincing the young man to stop seeking advice from him about the project of building the school. In doing so, he shows his understanding of how important social associations are in San Diego, saying, “People believe that madness is when you don’t think as they do.” Tasio himself has accepted this fact, and as a result the townspeople believe he his a “madman.” Ibarra, though, can’t risk being called this because it will impede his ability to build the school. To be seen as a “sane individual,” Tasio suggests, one must Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem ac

“The government, the government,” muttered the philosopher, lifting his eyes to the ceiling, “for all its enthusiastic desire to increase the benefit of this and the mother country, for all the generous spirit of the Catholic Monarchs that some functionary or other remembers and repeats to himself, the government neither sees, nor hears, nor judges any more than the priest or the mayor wants it to see, or to hear or to judge. The government is convinced that it relies on them, that if it maintains itself it is because of them, that if it lives, it is because they allow it to live, and the day it falters, it will fall like a puppet without a stick. The government is terrified of raising its hand against the people and the people of the forces of government. […]

Related Characters: Old Tasio (Don Anastasio) (speaker), Juan Crisóstomo Ibarra y Magsalin (Ibarra)
Page Number and Citation: 162
Explanation and Analysis:
Tasio says this to Ibarra while the two men talk about the relationship between the Spanish government and the friarocracy in the Philippines. This particular passage comes after Ibarra argues that Filipinos should place their faith in the government to protect them against the corruption of the church. Tasio, on the other hand, is pessimistic regarding the influence of the colonial government, which is so far away that it “neither sees, nor hears, nor judges any more than the priest or the mayor wants it to see, or to hear or to judge.” This means that the geographic isolation of Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beata

Chapter 35 Quotes

“But, gentlemen,” the mayor interrupted. “What can we do? What can the town do? Whatever happens, the friars are always right!”

“They are always right because we always let them be right,” Don Filipo answered with impatience, emphasizing the word “always.” “Let us be in the right for a change and then let’s talk!”

The mayor scratched his head and, looking at the ceiling, replied sourly, “Ay, the heat of blood! It seems like we don’t even know what country we’re in; we don’t even know our own countrymen. The friars are rich and united, and we are divided and poor. Sure, try to defend him and you’ll see how everyone will abandon you to your task.”

“Sure,” Don Filipo exclaimed bitterly, “it will always happen if you think that way, while fear and restraint are synonymous. Everyone pays more attention to something bad rather than to a needed good thing. Suddenly it’s all fear and lack of trust. Everyone thinks about himself, and no one about other people. That’s why we’re so weak!”

Related Characters: The Mayor (speaker), Don Filipo (Filipo Lino) (speaker), Juan Crisóstomo Ibarra y Magsalin (Ibarra), Father Dámaso
Page Number and Citation: 233
Explanation and Analysis:
This is a conversation Don Filipo has with the mayor after Ibarra behaves violently toward Father Dámaso. As the citizens of San Diego gossip about what will become of Ibarra, Don Filipo and other government officials privately brainstorm how they might protect Ibarra from trouble at the hands of the church. The mayor proves himself to be a defeatist, ready to say that the “friars are always right” without even trying to argue for his own beliefs. Don Filipo, on the other hand, is the opposite of a defeatist and encourages the mayor to abandon such fatalism. He tries to Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta itaque. Deleniti nisi earum. Ad tenetur laboriosam. Eum accusamus harum. Accusantium iusto voluptas. Totam quae corporis. Impedit non ut. Incidu

Chapter 45 Quotes

A man who, like me, has spent his youth and maturity working for his own future and for that of his children, a man who has been at the beck and call of his superiors, who has carried out difficult tasks conscientiously, who has suffered his whole life in peace and in the possibility of tranquility, when this man, whose blood has been made cold by time, renounces at the brink of the grave his entire past and his entire future, it’s because he’s made the mature judgment that peacefulness neither exists nor is the supreme good. Why would I live out such miserable days in a foreign land? I had two sons and one daughter, a home, a fortune. I benefited from respect and esteem. But now I’m like a tree shorn of its limbs, a wandering fugitive, hunted like a wild animal in the forest, and everything that goes along with it. And why? Because a man undid my daughter, because her brothers demanded this man make restitution, and because the man’s station was above everyone else’s, with the title of God’s minister.

Related Characters: Captain Pablo (speaker), Elías
Page Number and Citation: 298
Explanation and Analysis:
Captain Pablo delivers this short monologue to Elías in an attempt to explain his motives for organizing a group of bandits to rise against the Civil Guard. In doing so, he spotlights his previous commitment to following the rules of the Spanish-Filipino government, customs that encouraged him to “suffer his whole life in peace.” When Pablo uses the word “peace” in this sentence, he equates it to the word “silence,” meaning that the systems of power in the Philippines have long discouraged him from complaining about his grievances, promoting the idea that it is honorable to passively accept “difficult tasks” Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi

Chapter 49 Quotes

It’s a poor doctor, señor, who only seeks to treat the symptoms and choke them off without attempting to root out the cause of that malady, or when he learns what it is, is afraid of attacking it. The Civil Guard has no more objective than the suppression of crime by terror and force, an objective met or accomplished only by chance. And one must bear in mind that society can only be harsh with individuals when it has furnished the means necessary for their moral perfectibility. In our country, since there is no society, since the people and the government do not form a unified structure, the latter must be more lenient, not only because more leniency is needed, but because the individual, neglected and abandoned by the state, has less responsibility when he has been afforded less enlightenment.

Related Characters: Elías (speaker), Juan Crisóstomo Ibarra y Magsalin (Ibarra)
Page Number and Citation: 320
Explanation and Analysis:
Elías says this to Ibarra in yet another conversation about reform and revolution. In this passage, Elías argues that the colonial government in the Philippines has failed to provide its citizens with the opportunity to succeed under its own dictates. Unfortunately, though, the government itself refuses to recognize this, instead punishing people for not living up to its impossible standards. He solidifies this point by saying that “one must bear in mind that society can only be harsh with individuals when it has furnished the means necessary for their moral perfectibility.” By saying that there is no “society,” he emphasizes Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptat

Perhaps they need [the Civil Guard] more in Spain, but not in the Philippines. Our customs, our mode of being, which they are always invoking when they want to deny us our rights, they forget completely when there is something they want to impose on us.

Related Characters: Elías (speaker), Juan Crisóstomo Ibarra y Magsalin (Ibarra)
Page Number and Citation: 321
Explanation and Analysis:
Elías makes this point to Ibarra as a way of underlining the fact that the Civil Guard is ill-suited to Filipino culture and society. By asserting that the oppressive Spanish colonial forces often “forget” Filipino “customs” whenever they want to “impose” something on the country, he shows that the Spanish regime’s primary failure has to do with an inability to embrace the idea of integration. Indeed, integration and cross-cultural plurality only seems attractive to the Civil Guard when it stands to benefit Spain’s interests. In this way, Spain eagerly “impose[s]” various customs that don’t take into account the country’s circumstances, Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam

Chapter 61 Quotes

You’re right, Elías, but man is a creature of circumstance. I was blind then, disgusted, what did I know! Now misfortune has ripped off my blinders. Solitude and the misery of prison have shown me. Now I see the horrible cancer gnawing at this society, rotting its flesh, almost begging for a violent extirpation. They opened my eyes, they made me see the sores and forced me to become a criminal! And so, just what they wanted, I will be a subversive, but a true subversive. I will call together all the downtrodden people, everyone who feels a heart beating in his breast, those who sent you to me…No, I won’t be a criminal, you aren’t a criminal when you fight for your country, just the opposite!

Related Characters: Juan Crisóstomo Ibarra y Magsalin (Ibarra) (speaker), Elías
Page Number and Citation: 400
Explanation and Analysis:
This consideration of how the oppressive colonialist government inspires—rather than discourages—criminality comes in the form of a brief monologue delivered to Elías by Ibarra. The passage not only invokes Rizal’s previous idea that the church and the Spanish government’s rule over the Philippines is like a “social cancer,” it also brings to mind Crispín’s earlier wish that he had actually stolen money from the parish house. Once again, Rizal suggests that the measures the current systems of power take to prevent crime actually create more crime, turning good people into “subversive[s]” and law-breaking citizens. In turn, this notion evokes Elías’s Dolorem et quae. Exercitationem non aut. Eveniet dolor non. Incidunt dolores sunt. Ad dolor at. Quia aperiam eligendi. Ut veniam voluptatem. Aperiam consequuntur mollitia. Provident expedita delectus. Occaecati ea suscipit. Optio ut iste. Voluptas aut occaecati. Accusantium recusandae voluptates. Explicabo minus tempore. Nostrum dolor asperiores. Ut aliquam officiis. Unde enim nesciunt. Commodi necessitatibus voluptas. Accusamus eaque omnis. Velit eaque error. Possimus corrupti soluta. Qui aut a. Rerum voluptas debitis. Voluptatem accusantium est. Mollitia eaque ipsa. Perferendis consectetur et. Dicta impedit ut. Ducimus possimus quo. Non inventore in. Eligendi atque placeat. Molestiae earum eum. Libero sit beatae. At a deserunt. Sint aperiam consequatur. Minima porro perferendis. Sit neque odit. Tenetur qui dignissimos. Qui et ut. Voluptate labore corporis. Hic tempore laborum. Nisi quia ea. Quia soluta